On Fri, Nov 03, 2023 at 02:29:55PM +1100, duluxoz via Postfix-users wrote:
> Quick Q: Do the individual `-o` options in the `master.cfg` file *add to* or
> *override* the equivalent option in the `main.cfg` file?
https://www.postfix.org/master.5.html
--
Viktor.
_
Hi All,
Quick Q: Do the individual `-o` options in the `master.cfg` file *add
to* or *override* the equivalent option in the `main.cfg` file?
For eg: In the `master.cfg` file I've got a `-o smtpd_relay_restriction
=` line with a couple of restrictions set on the `submission` service.
I've go
Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users wrote in
:
|>Jens Hoffrichter via Postfix-users wrote in
|> :
|>|On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 8:12 PM Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users
|>| wrote:
|> ...
|>|> Btw i would wonder: why do -- as email operators -- still use DKIM
|>|> at all, since there is
> This can be verified on Solaris with:
>
> /usr/bin/elfdump -re 'dyn:' path/to/binary_or_library
sorry, this must read: (solaris elfedit in read-only-mode)
/usr/bin/elfedit -re 'dyn:' path/to/binary_or_library
___
Postfix-users mailing list
On Thu, Nov 02, 2023 at 03:56:16AM -0400, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 02, 2023 at 09:35:47AM +0200, Jaco Lesch via Postfix-users wrote:
>
> > > I would have tried instead:
> > >
> > > PKG_CONFIG_PATH=/usr/openssl/3/lib/64/pkgconfig \
> > > make makefiles dy
If I have Postfix configured to use Dovecot SASL via TCP, and Dovecot
is running on a remote server, can I set up Postfix to use TLS for its
connection to Dovecot SASL?
Postfix main.cf:
smtpd_sasl_path = inet:dovecot.example.com:12345
smtpd_sasl_type = dovecot
Dovecot:
service auth {
inet_l
Stephan Bosch via Postfix-devel:
>
> Op 2-11-2023 om 15:22 schreef Wietse Venema:
> > Stephan Bosch via Postfix-devel:
> >> Looks like Postfix [...] somehow uses the data from the previous CONT auth
> >> service
> >> response as the reason.
> > Does this patch address the problem? It resets any p
Eray Aslan via Postfix-users:
> On Wed, Nov 01, 2023 at 09:41:07AM -0400, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
> wrote:
> > Eray Aslan via Postfix-users:
> > > Having said that, Berkeley DB is mature software and it works and is
> > > widely available in various *nixes. Still, would it be prudent or wo
On 2023-11-02 at 04:49:37 UTC-0400 (Thu, 02 Nov 2023 10:49:37 +0200)
Ivan Ionut via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
Hi, it's possible that postscreen does not block the email when
postscreen_dnsbl_threshold is reached but to pass that email to
spamassassin(with a score and a tag).
No
Hi!
Thanks for the insight - it was not only about forwarding mail to
gmail (although I understand that this is a big use case being
discussed here), but really about just delivering email to Google /
GMail / Workspace.
The scenario I'm unsure about is the following:
Envelope From is @amazonses.
* Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users :
> > And thus the solution is: Don't use the dnsbl in postscreen, but ONLY
> > in spamassassin/rspamd instead.
>
> No problem, you can safely use postscreen with multiple DNSBLs and DNSWLs.
> - just don't rely on single hit, unless it's your own DNSBL.
On 02.11.23 10:49, Ivan Ionut via Postfix-users wrote:
> Hi, it's possible that postscreen does not block the email when
> postscreen_dnsbl_threshold is reached but to pass that email to
> spamassassin(with a score and a tag).
* Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users :
Postscreen does not t
* Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users :
> On 02.11.23 10:49, Ivan Ionut via Postfix-users wrote:
> > Hi, it's possible that postscreen does not block the email when
> > postscreen_dnsbl_threshold is reached but to pass that email to
> > spamassassin(with a score and a tag).
>
> Postscreen do
On 02.11.23 12:04, Jens Hoffrichter via Postfix-users wrote:
Actually, I was just discussing these things - this is just regarding
the new requirements from Google and Yahoo starting Feb 1st.
What happens, if a mail is sent from AmazonSES, with a signature key
from amazonses.com, but with a he
Dnia 2.11.2023 o godz. 09:42:01 Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users pisze:
(once more: DKIM applies on header From:, SPF on envelope from:).
On 02.11.23 11:18, Jaroslaw Rafa via Postfix-users wrote:
And DMARC requires that both be identical (actually, from the same domain -
user part may
On 02.11.23 10:49, Ivan Ionut via Postfix-users wrote:
Hi, it's possible that postscreen does not block the email when
postscreen_dnsbl_threshold is reached but to pass that email to
spamassassin(with a score and a tag).
Postscreen does not tag. It passes or blocks the mail.
--
Matus UHLAR
Actually, I was just discussing these things - this is just regarding
the new requirements from Google and Yahoo starting Feb 1st.
What happens, if a mail is sent from AmazonSES, with a signature key
from amazonses.com, but with a header from set to something different,
like hoffrichter.no
Would
On November 2, 2023 10:18:38 AM UTC, Jaroslaw Rafa via Postfix-users
wrote:
>Dnia 2.11.2023 o godz. 09:42:01 Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users
>pisze:
>> (once more: DKIM applies on header From:, SPF on envelope from:).
>
>And DMARC requires that both be identical (actually, from the
Dnia 2.11.2023 o godz. 09:42:01 Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users pisze:
> (once more: DKIM applies on header From:, SPF on envelope from:).
And DMARC requires that both be identical (actually, from the same domain -
user part may be different), which makes things even harder.
--
Regards,
Hi, it's possible that postscreen does not block the email when
postscreen_dnsbl_threshold is reached but to pass that email to
spamassassin(with a score and a tag).
--
Ivan Ionuț
Str. Mircea cel Bătrân nr 1, Galati 800023
Tel/Fax: +40236 493277
Email: ivan.io...@tehnopol-gl.ro
_The con
Jens Hoffrichter via Postfix-users wrote in
:
|On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 8:12 PM Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users
| wrote:
...
|> Btw i would wonder: why do -- as email operators -- still use DKIM
|> at all, since there is ARC and it also offers signatures and
|> verification? The OpenSSL (-users
On Thu, Nov 02, 2023 at 09:35:47AM +0200, Jaco Lesch via Postfix-users wrote:
> > I would have tried instead:
> >
> > PKG_CONFIG_PATH=/usr/openssl/3/lib/64/pkgconfig \
> > make makefiles dynamicmaps=yes shared=yes \
> > openssl_path="/usr/openssl/3/bin/openssl" \
> >
On 2023/11/01 17:53, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote:
On Wed, Nov 01, 2023 at 12:07:31PM +0200, Jaco Lesch via Postfix-users wrote:
Building an OpenSSL Application
The development files are available in the /usr/openssl/3/sub-directo-
ries. To build an OpenSSL
On Wed, Nov 01, 2023 at 09:41:07AM -0400, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
> Eray Aslan via Postfix-users:
> > Having said that, Berkeley DB is mature software and it works and is
> > widely available in various *nixes. Still, would it be prudent or worth
> > the effort to change the default
24 matches
Mail list logo
