re:
https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/exchange-team-blog/updated-requirements-for-smtp-relay-through-exchange-online/ba-p/3851357
Let's say I send an email. I use:
> mail from:
and in the data (body)
> From: Professional Legit Person
Looking at headers from Microsoft, they track
Jesper Dybdal via Postfix-users:
> On 2023-09-13 09:00, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users wrote (in
> another thread):
>
> > you may need to limit number of concurrent amavis instances if you
> > don't have enough of CPU or RAM, e.g. in main.cf:
> >
> > smtp-amavis_destination_concurrency
On 2023-09-13 09:00, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users wrote (in
another thread):
you may need to limit number of concurrent amavis instances if you
don't have enough of CPU or RAM, e.g. in main.cf:
smtp-amavis_destination_concurrency_limit = 2
and in amavis config:
$max_servers = 2;
lutz.niederer--- via Postfix-users:
> Hi!
>
> "The minimum amount of time that postscreen(8) will use the result from a
> successful DNS-based reputation test before a client IP address is required
> to pass that test again."
>
> By "successful" ...
>
> 1 - Do you mean that postscreen was able
Dnia 13.09.2023 o godz. 12:54:39 DL Neil via Postfix-users pisze:
> unknown[146.247.146.134]: SASL LOGIN authentication failed: UGFzc3dvcmQ6
> 14-0-135-011.static.pccw-hkt.com[14.0.135.11]: SASL LOGIN
> authentication failed: UGFzc3dvcmQ6
> ...
>
> What is the setting to get rid of these dozens of
Hi!
"The minimum amount of time that postscreen(8) will use the result from a
successful DNS-based reputation test before a client IP address is required to
pass that test again."
By "successful" ...
1 - Do you mean that postscreen was able to successfully get any data from a
dnsbl query - wh
On 13/09/23 12:54, DL Neil via Postfix-users wrote:
Have been updating the .cf files (mostly ciphers, but also...)
Our old friend "UGFzc3dvcmQ6" is back.
This is simply base64 for "Password", all it indicates is an invalid
login attempt using the LOGIN mech.
What is the setting to get rid o
On Sun, September 10, 2023 2:03 am, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote:
Your amavis content filter has a non-trivial backlog of mail, probably
because each message takes a long time to process. Here the message sat
5.4 seconds in the incoming queue and then took 11 seconds to to deliver
to
