[pfx] Re: DANE and DNSSEC

2023-05-10 Thread Byung-Hee HWANG via Postfix-users
Joachim Lindenberg via Postfix-users writes: > DNSSEC is mandatory for DANE. Hellow Joachim! Thanks for kind replying ^^^ Sincerely, Byung-Hee -- ^고맙습니다 _布德天下_ 감사합니다_^))// ___ Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org To unsubscribe

[pfx] Re: DANE and DNSSEC

2023-05-10 Thread Joachim Lindenberg via Postfix-users
DNSSEC is mandatory for DANE. Greetings, Joachim -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Byung-Hee HWANG via Postfix-users Gesendet: Donnerstag, 11. Mai 2023 08:17 An: Postfix Users Betreff: [pfx] DANE and DNSSEC Hellow Postfix hackers, I have a questions while reading DANE docs. Is DNSSEC man

[pfx] DANE and DNSSEC

2023-05-10 Thread Byung-Hee HWANG via Postfix-users
Hellow Postfix hackers, I have a questions while reading DANE docs. Is DNSSEC mandotary? For making DANE mail server. For now i'm running two postfix servers in public. Actually i'm beginner in both DANE and DNSSEC. Any comments welcome! Sincerely, Byung-Hee -- ^고맙습니다 _布德天下_ 감사합니다_^))// _

[pfx] Re: working around crypto policies turned up to 11

2023-05-10 Thread Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users
postfix-users@postfix.org wrote in : |On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 06:13:25PM -0400, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users \ |wrote: |> We're thinking of adding a few new settings to the stable Postfix |> releases that allow Postfix to regain some control over crypto |> policies that do not necessarily

[pfx] Re: postscreen sends 450 without deep tests

2023-05-10 Thread Phil Stracchino via Postfix-users
On 5/10/23 02:40, Peter via Postfix-users wrote: On 8/05/23 00:27, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote: After multiple such connnections, postscreen could theoretically decide that the client is unlikely to ever connect to the primary MX, but by then the client will likely already have given u