fh--- via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-03-24 02:16:
When other users in this postfix system send email to users in this
domain, will it be delivered locally? How can I force postfix to
deliver messages just following MX records?
make sure postfix database files do not have this domain in there
* natan via Postfix-users :
> Hi
> Today uceprotect add class /24 to blaclist ... One user (dedicated server)
> send probably spam but the user claims that he did not send spam only 6
> e-mails in 1h. And uceprotect was blocked by the whole class ...
>
> other RBLs it was clean any IP with that cl
On 2023-03-24 10:49, Antonio Leding via Postfix-users wrote:
Got it…
Also, just an FYI - But I’ve always been able to confirm my posts are
working properly by reviewing the list archive. Posts seem to appear
almost as fast as received by the list members so typically a good way
to verify eve
Got it…
Also, just an FYI - But I’ve always been able to confirm my posts are
working properly by reviewing the list archive. Posts seem to appear
almost as fast as received by the list members so typically a good way
to verify everything is working ok…
Just my .02…
https://www.mail-archiv
Hello
I have a domain setup in postfix as virtual domains.
But MX records for this domain point to external systems currently, such
as google workspace.
When other users in this postfix system send email to users in this
domain, will it be delivered locally? How can I force postfix to deliver
On Thu, 23 Mar 2023, Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users wrote:
[...]
(That is pretty off-topic for postfix; except maybe for fun
posting my SMTP related firewall
[...]
add_rule -p tcp --src ${addr}${mask} \
--dport ${p_smtp} -m limit --limit 60/m -j
Dnia 23.03.2023 o godz. 19:08:53 Steffen Nurpmeso pisze:
> You are unlocked again. (But as it periodically came back
> every few minutes yesterday evening, it likely will now, too.)
>
> This cannot be if you do normal SMTP or HTTP, not from the
> firewall side. These rules only lowers bandwidth,
Jaroslaw Rafa wrote in
<20230322230223.ga17...@rafa.eu.org>:
|Dnia 22.03.2023 o godz. 23:05:59 Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users pisze:
|> I have very strict firewall rules, and you have become blocked for
|> last access + 84000 seconds.
|> Should work again.
|
|I again got blocked... As I
Hi
Today uceprotect add class /24 to blaclist ... One user (dedicated
server) send probably spam but the user claims that he did not send spam
only 6 e-mails in 1h. And uceprotect was blocked by the whole class ...
other RBLs it was clean any IP with that class /24
Any idea ? I'm not going to
thinking about your remark I came up that my idea is not well thought
anyway :-) header_checks are after pre-queue filter and we already have
a milter app running pre-queue. So a timestamp from the milter app would
be before the header from postfix, which is more what I look for. We
will add th
Dnia 23.03.2023 o godz. 12:48:36 Tobi via Postfix-users pisze:
I wonder if the following is possible: can postfix add a header with
a dynamic value? My goal would be to add a header with the current
unix timestamp on the edge system and then check that header against
current time on last system i
Dnia 23.03.2023 o godz. 12:48:36 Tobi via Postfix-users pisze:
> I wonder if the following is possible: can postfix add a header with
> a dynamic value? My goal would be to add a header with the current
> unix timestamp on the edge system and then check that header against
> current time on last sy
Hi there
I wonder if the following is possible: can postfix add a header with a
dynamic value? My goal would be to add a header with the current unix
timestamp on the edge system and then check that header against current
time on last system in the delivery chain.
Have a good one
tobi
Hi!,
There are any way to implement equivalent to "warn_id_reject" for milters?
I'm deploying centralized spam milter on inet:X: and I would
like to deploy as "dryrun" to evaluate rejections before full enable it,
and activate it gradually on different servers.
Thanks!
__
Hi All,
TL:DR: Could someone(s) please have a look-see at our config as a sanity
check for us, and also answer the questions at the end of this post -
thanks.
So we're finally putting in an email stack and while I've read just
about every tutorial I can find on the web - and read *all* of th
and i noticed
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=2; list.sys4.de;
dkim=pass header.d=junc.eu header.i=@junc.eu;
arc=pass;
dmarc=pass (Used From Domain Record) header.from=junc.eu
policy.dmarc=reject
Authentication-Results: list.sys4.de;
dkim=pass header.d=junc.eu header.i=@junc.eu; arc=pass;
16 matches
Mail list logo
