Re: Incorrect rewrite on senders address

On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 11:29:51AM +0700, Olivier wrote: > recipient_canonical_maps = ldap:$config_directory/ldap_user_uncanonical, > ldap:$config_directory/ldap_deleted_uncanonical > sender_canonical_maps = ldap:$config_directory/ldap_canonical The most likely problem table is "sender_canoni

Re: Incorrect rewrite on senders address

Thank you. Bill Cole writes: > On 2023-01-16 at 22:14:15 UTC-0500 (Tue, 17 Jan 2023 10:14:15 +0700) > Olivier > is rumored to have said: > >> Hello, >> >> This is a preliminary request before I gather all needed informations. >> >> I have a problem with rewriting: I received an email from an ou

Re: Incorrect rewrite on senders address

On 2023-01-16 at 22:14:15 UTC-0500 (Tue, 17 Jan 2023 10:14:15 +0700) Olivier is rumored to have said: Hello, This is a preliminary request before I gather all needed informations. I have a problem with rewriting: I received an email from an outside person and that person happens to have the s

Incorrect rewrite on senders address

Hello, This is a preliminary request before I gather all needed informations. I have a problem with rewriting: I received an email from an outside person and that person happens to have the same name as one of my user. The sender's address has been rewritten to that of my user. ie: j...@gmail.co

Re: SPF fail and domain fail, why?

On January 17, 2023 2:25:34 AM UTC, raf wrote: >On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 08:01:10PM +0100, Maurizio Caloro >wrote: > >> Hello >> >> Please one more thing about Opendmarc, if send any email to any where >> i see in log SPF fail, domain.ch fail ? >> >> Jan 16 19:43:39 nmail opendkim[16490]: B6

Re: SPF fail and domain fail, why?

On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 08:01:10PM +0100, Maurizio Caloro wrote: > Hello > > Please one more thing about Opendmarc, if send any email to any where > i see in log SPF fail, domain.ch fail ? > > Jan 16 19:43:39 nmail opendkim[16490]: B6090404C3: DKIM-Signature field > added (s=nmail, d=caloro.ch

Re: relay transport ignore

On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 02:25:06PM +0100, Matteo Cazzador wrote: > Hi, i 've  question, i need to migrate a virtual domain from 2 server (with > postfix). > > On the new server i define mail users and domain but it'isnt in production > now dns record defined. > > On the same new soerver i've o

Re: postfix/pickup question

Scott Kitterman skrev den 2023-01-16 16:29: On January 16, 2023 2:13:42 PM UTC, Wietse Venema wrote: Maurizio Caloro: The option that was cause: -failurereports -failureReportssendby emailaddress DO NOT run milters as the 'postfix' user. Only Postfix programs should use that userid. FY

SPF fail and domain fail, why?

Hello Please one more thing about Opendmarc, if send any email to any where i see in log SPF fail, domain.ch fail ? Jan 16 19:43:39 nmail opendkim[16490]: B6090404C3: DKIM-Signature field added (s=nmail, d=caloro.ch) Jan 16 19:43:39 nmail opendmarc[16483]: B6090404C3: SPF(mailfrom): caloro.ch

Re: postfix/pickup question

Scott Kitterman: > On January 16, 2023 2:13:42 PM UTC, Wietse Venema > wrote: > >Maurizio Caloro: > >> The option that was cause: > >> -failurereports > >> -failureReportssendby emailaddress > > > >DO NOT run milters as the 'postfix' user. Only Postfix programs > >should use that userid. > >

Re: postfix/pickup question

On January 16, 2023 2:13:42 PM UTC, Wietse Venema wrote: >Maurizio Caloro: >> The option that was cause: >> -failurereports >> -failureReportssendby emailaddress > >DO NOT run milters as the 'postfix' user. Only Postfix programs >should use that userid. FYI, Since this appears to be a Deb

Re: postfix/pickup question

Maurizio Caloro: > The option that was cause: > -failurereports > -failureReportssendby emailaddress DO NOT run milters as the 'postfix' user. Only Postfix programs should use that userid. Wietse

Re: postfix/pickup question

> Am 16.01.2023 um 13:45 schrieb Wietse Venema : > > Maurizio Caloro: >>> Am 16.01.2023 um 00:53 schrieb Wietse Venema: >>> What is the name for uid 109? >>> >>>Wietse >> >> postfix:x:109:115::/var/spool/postfix:/bin/false >> Debian-exim:x:104:109::/var/spool/exim4:/bin/false > > And wh

Re: block domain

natan skrev den 2023-01-16 11:28: /etc/postfix/sender_checks.pcre ... /emailll\.org/  DISCARD Too many fake spam2 /surdeu\.de/  DISCARD Too many fake spam you accept payload to /dev/null with it, its more simple to use reject, msg after discard is not seen in the sender client

Re: block domain

natan: > Hi > Is there any chance to reject domain (incomming) via postscreen ? postscreen does not know the sender email addres when it allows or denies a client. It logs the sender address only after it has already decided to deny a client. > I get many e-mails from one domain (from diferent IP

Re: postfix/pickup question

Maurizio Caloro: > Am 16.01.2023 um 00:53 schrieb Wietse Venema: > > What is the name for uid 109? > > > > Wietse > > postfix:x:109:115::/var/spool/postfix:/bin/false > Debian-exim:x:104:109::/var/spool/exim4:/bin/false And what are you using to submit mail to Postfix? Some program is using t

Re: block domain

Hi I mean /etc/postfix/sender_checks.pcre ... /emailll\.org/  DISCARD Too many fake spam2 /surdeu\.de/  DISCARD Too many fake spam ... W dniu 16.01.2023 o 11:03, natan pisze: Hi Is there any chance to reject domain (incomming) via postscreen ? I get many e-mails from one domain

block domain

Hi Is there any chance to reject domain (incomming) via postscreen ? I get many e-mails from one domain (from diferent IP) NOQUEUE: discard: RCPT from vc-gp-n-105-244-68-222.umts.vodacom.co.za[105.244.68.222]: : Sender address Too many fake spam; from= to= proto=ESMTP helo= I reject in ...