On Fri, Dec 02, 2022 at 09:47:03AM -0500, Wietse Venema
wrote:
> raf:
> > On Fri, Dec 02, 2022 at 08:51:14AM -0500, Wietse Venema
> > wrote:
> >
> > > David Dolan:
> > > > I guess it's using the musl resolver in Alpine so we need to migrate OS
> > > > to
> > > > get past this issue?
> > >
>
On Fri, Dec 02, 2022 at 10:24:29AM -0500, Jonathan Capra
wrote:
>
> OK this is weird.
>
> I have in main.cf:
>
> relayhost = helix.wtfayla.net
I don't think you need the above line. The fact that
helix is the primary MX server is enough for Postfix on
caduceus to know to send mail for the re
On Fri, 2022-12-02 at 11:36 -0500, John Stoffel wrote:
I check, but I find my IP for mail.stoffel.org in the UCEPROTECT-3
spam list. Nothing I can do about it.
I doubt that many sites block by using UCEPROTECH-3 alone, but you can
use www.whitelisted.org to be excluded from it.
-Jim P.
Viktor Dukhovni:
> On Fri, Dec 02, 2022 at 11:36:30AM -0500, John Stoffel wrote:
>
> > I tried setting up /etc/postfix/transport_maps like this:
> >
> >charter.net [mobile.charter.net]:587
The right-hand side should be
transport:nexthop
or
transport:nexthop:service-or-po
On Fri, Dec 02, 2022 at 11:36:30AM -0500, John Stoffel wrote:
> I tried setting up /etc/postfix/transport_maps like this:
>
>charter.net [mobile.charter.net]:587
>
> But it started routing all my outgoing email through them, which isn't
> going to work.
That's not the way the transport tab
Viktor Dukhovni:
> On Fri, Dec 02, 2022 at 12:54:21PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> > > You can verify that with postmap -q commands.
> >
> > And this is because Postfix does an implicit reject_unlisted_recipient
> > after smtpd_recipient_restrictions. That behavior can be disabled only
> > by
UCEProtect are gangsters, even the founder admits: https://uceprotect.wtf/. You
don´t want to do anything about it, except you are located in Europe and can
complain to their customers and authorities violating GDPR.
Greetings,
Joachim
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: owner-postfix-us..
Steffen Nurpmeso wrote in
<20221202180252.bmzqg%stef...@sdaoden.eu>:
|Viktor Dukhovni wrote in
| :
||On Fri, Dec 02, 2022 at 06:03:51PM +0100, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
||> Simply add a dnsmasq local cache. dnsmasq is a package on
...
||Deploying dnsmasq does not do anything to address the li
Viktor Dukhovni wrote in
:
|On Fri, Dec 02, 2022 at 06:03:51PM +0100, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
|
|> Simply add a dnsmasq local cache. dnsmasq is a package on
|> AlpineLinux, i use it. (Including dnssec, and it even serves its
|> cache back into a VPN, so that effectively only one instance do
On Fri, Dec 02, 2022 at 12:54:21PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > You can verify that with postmap -q commands.
>
> And this is because Postfix does an implicit reject_unlisted_recipient
> after smtpd_recipient_restrictions. That behavior can be disabled only
> by configuring reject_unlisted_rec
Wietse Venema:
> Jonathan Capra:
> >
> > Thanks so much, Wietse...
>
> > # postmap -q fongaboo.com /etc/postfix/relay_domains
> > OK
>
> Based on your earlier posting:
>
> relay_domains = hash:/etc/postfix/relay_domains
>
> Therefore recipients are primarily validated with relay_recipient_
On Fri, Dec 02, 2022 at 11:42:54AM -0500, Jonathan Capra wrote:
> # grep fongaboo.com /etc/postfix/relay_domains
> fongaboo.comOK
>
> # postmap -q fongaboo.com /etc/postfix/relay_domains
> OK
Fine.
> # grep fongaboo.com /etc/postfix/relay_recipients
Partial output here is not that useful.
Jonathan Capra:
>
> Thanks so much, Wietse...
> # postmap -q fongaboo.com /etc/postfix/relay_domains
> OK
Based on your earlier posting:
relay_domains = hash:/etc/postfix/relay_domains
Therefore recipients are primarily validated with relay_recipient_maps.
Based on your earlier posting:
On Fri, Dec 02, 2022 at 06:03:51PM +0100, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
> Simply add a dnsmasq local cache. dnsmasq is a package on
> AlpineLinux, i use it. (Including dnssec, and it even serves its
> cache back into a VPN, so that effectively only one instance does
> all the web queries.) (I use it
Felker has past history with this mailing list and postfix, as well as
some things related to annoyances like versioning.
Are you on a MUSL libc system? IIRC there's no support for TCP in
MUSL's stub resolver. See, for example:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28312935
https://news
Wietse Venema wrote in
<4nnwkv4frxzj...@spike.porcupine.org>:
|raf:
|> On Fri, Dec 02, 2022 at 08:51:14AM -0500, Wietse Venema e.org> wrote:
|>
|>> David Dolan:
|>>> I guess it's using the musl resolver in Alpine so we need to migrate \
|>>> OS to
|>>> get past this issue?
|>>
|>> Yes.
Thanks so much, Wietse...
# grep fongaboo.com /etc/postfix/relay_domains
fongaboo.comOK
#
# postmap relay_domains
#
# postmap -q fongaboo.com /etc/postfix/relay_domains
OK
#
# postmap -q notfongaboo.com /etc/postfix/relay_domains
#
#
# grep fongaboo.com /etc/postfix/relay_recipients | more
Hi all,
I run my own domain @stoffel.org and I'm trying to fix a problem
sending email to @charter.net users, since Spectrum has blocked my
Linode's ASN number completely. My IP passes all the RBL blacklists
their first line support suggested I check, but I find my IP for
mail.stoffel.org in the
Jonathan Capra:
>
> Thanks. Here you go:
>
>
> # postconf -nf
>
> alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases
> alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases
> append_dot_mydomain = no
> biff = no
> compatibility_level = 2
> inet_interfaces = all
> inet_protocols = all
> mailbox_size_limit = 0
> maximal_queue_lifetime
> "Henry" == Henry R writes:
> I was once charter's customer.
> But I leave them since charter was bought by Spectrum.
> And spectrum blocks all IP from DO and Linode.
Yup, so now I'm trying to setup things so that my postfix routes all
emails to @charter.net users via my charter login, but
Thanks. Here you go:
# postconf -nf
alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases
alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases
append_dot_mydomain = no
biff = no
compatibility_level = 2
inet_interfaces = all
inet_protocols = all
mailbox_size_limit = 0
maximal_queue_lifetime = 10d
mydestination = $myhostname, ca2ceus.
Jonathan Capra:
>
> OK this is weird.
>
> I have in main.cf:
>
> relayhost = helix.wtfayla.net
> relay_recipient_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/relay_recipients
> relay_domains = hash:/etc/postfix/relay_domains
Did you already post "postconf -nf" and "postconf -Mf"
output as requested?
> But if I ru
OK this is weird.
I have in main.cf:
relayhost = helix.wtfayla.net
relay_recipient_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/relay_recipients
relay_domains = hash:/etc/postfix/relay_domains
But if I run postconf -d | grep relay, I see:
relay_domains = ${{$compatibility_level} < {2} ? {$mydestination} : {}}
David Dolan:
> I guess it's using the musl resolver in Alpine so we need to migrate OS to
> get past this issue?
On Fri, Dec 02, 2022 at 08:51:14AM -0500, Wietse Venema
wrote:
Yes. Don't use toy software in production.
On 03.12.22 00:59, raf wrote:
I suspect that alpine is used in many ma
raf:
> On Fri, Dec 02, 2022 at 08:51:14AM -0500, Wietse Venema
> wrote:
>
> > David Dolan:
> > > I guess it's using the musl resolver in Alpine so we need to migrate OS to
> > > get past this issue?
> >
> > Yes. Don't use toy software in production.
> >
> > Wietse
>
> I suspect that alpin
On Fri, Dec 02, 2022 at 08:51:14AM -0500, Wietse Venema
wrote:
> David Dolan:
> > I guess it's using the musl resolver in Alpine so we need to migrate OS to
> > get past this issue?
>
> Yes. Don't use toy software in production.
>
> Wietse
I suspect that alpine is used in many many
dock
David Dolan:
> On Fri, 2 Dec 2022 at 10:33, David Dolan wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Subject:Re: helo command rejected
> >> From: Viktor Dukhovni
> >> Date: 2022-12-01 16:56:13
> >> Message-ID: Y4jcrRxsEJPsWZVZ () straasha ! imrryr ! org
> >> [Download RAW message or body]
> >>
> >> On T
On Fri, 2 Dec 2022 at 10:33, David Dolan wrote:
>
>
> Subject:Re: helo command rejected
>> From: Viktor Dukhovni
>> Date: 2022-12-01 16:56:13
>> Message-ID: Y4jcrRxsEJPsWZVZ () straasha ! imrryr ! org
>> [Download RAW message or body]
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 04:06:30PM +000
Subject:Re: helo command rejected
> From: Viktor Dukhovni
> Date: 2022-12-01 16:56:13
> Message-ID: Y4jcrRxsEJPsWZVZ () straasha ! imrryr ! org
> [Download RAW message or body]
>
> On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 04:06:30PM +, David Dolan wrote:
>
> > This is the full line:
> >
> > NO
29 matches
Mail list logo
