Re: understanding empty message-id header

Juan Smitt Jr: > > Thank you for the explanation. > > Is it really risky to implement "always_add_missing_headers" if other headers > (i.e. From) are present? Yes. This would break DKIM signatures. Wietse > https://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#always_add_missing_headers > > > Than

Re: [OT] Why no envelope sender in RECEIVED?

Dnia 10.11.2022 o godz. 19:39:25 MRob pisze: > > If its private why would MTA give that information to anyone else? It does not. The feature you are requesting would cause it to do so. > As noted often envelope sender goes into return-path header so whats This is the FINAL envelope sender that

Re: understanding empty message-id header

Thank you for the explanation. Is it really risky to implement "always_add_missing_headers" if other headers (i.e. From) are present? https://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#always_add_missing_headers Thanks! --- Original Message --- On Friday, November 11th, 2022 at 13:17, Mark

Re: understanding empty message-id header

11.11.22, 13:02 +0100, Juan Smitt Jr: Can you help me please understand the "message-id" header? Sometimes it's missing from the emails and i.e. gmail rejects these emails. Is it added by the email client (application) or is it added by postfix? The Message-ID header contains an unique ident

understanding empty message-id header

Hello, Can you help me please understand the "message-id" header? Sometimes it's missing from the emails and i.e. gmail rejects these emails. Is it added by the email client (application) or is it added by postfix? Thank you!

Re: Forward & Reverse DNS Lookups not working correctly

ok this was muchly appreciated i have it working now i did have a mismatch on the dns and i was also running 3 local networks which were also not setup properly the postfix utilities helped a lot. thanks again. Happy Friday !!! Thanks - paul Paul Kudla Scom.ca Internet Services