On 2022-10-06 at 22:25:26 UTC-0400 (Fri, 7 Oct 2022 10:25:26 +0800)
Henrik Park
is rumored to have said:
Hello,
If my server forward the messages without implementing SRS, but
doesn't change any content in messages so they won't break DKIM, will
this forwarding be accepted by the destination
On 7/10/22 15:25, Henrik Park wrote:
Hello,
If my server forward the messages without implementing SRS, but doesn't
change any content in messages so they won't break DKIM, will this
forwarding be accepted by the destination mailserver?
There is no simple answer to this question. It really
Hello,
If my server forward the messages without implementing SRS, but doesn't
change any content in messages so they won't break DKIM, will this
forwarding be accepted by the destination mailserver?
Thanks.
--
Simple Mail
https://simplemail.co.in/
Viktor Dukhovni:
> On Thu, Oct 06, 2022 at 06:12:19PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> > This could happen for messages with 500 or more recipients,
> > or with fewer recipients on a busy mail server. Problem
> > reported by Frank Brendel, reproduced by John Alex. Files:
> > qmgr/qm
On Thu, Oct 06, 2022 at 06:12:19PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> This could happen for messages with 500 or more recipients,
> or with fewer recipients on a busy mail server. Problem
> reported by Frank Brendel, reproduced by John Alex. Files:
> qmgr/qmgr_message.c, oqmgr/q
kipped under sone
conditions. The patch addresses the inconsistency.
Wietse
20221006
Bugfix (introduced: Postfix 3.7). Messages could falsely
be flagged as corrupt with "warning: Unexpected record type
'X'". These messages were moved to the "
On Thu, Oct 06, 2022 at 01:37:39PM -0400, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> It is possible that your resolver has fallen victim to the RHEL/Fedora
> "crypto policy" changes that by default disable (i.e. make fail)
> RSAwithSHA1 signature validation.
>
> https://lwn.net/Articles/887832/
> https://b
On Thu, Oct 06, 2022 at 12:19:48PM -0400, PGNet Dev wrote:
> I see lots of these,
>
> 2022-10-05T17:30:13.277421-04:00 mx03 postfix/smtp-out-ext/smtp[8484]:
> warning: DANE TLSA lookup problem:
> Host or domain name not found.
> Name service error for name=_25._tcp.c
PGNet Dev:
> 2022-10-05T17:30:13.277421-04:00 mx03 postfix/smtp-out-ext/smtp[8484]:
> warning: DANE TLSA lookup problem: Host or domain name not found. Name
> service error for name=_25._tcp.christopher-ew.state.gov type=TLSA: Host not
> found, try again
The Postfix SMTP client handles S
running
postfix 3.7.2
mailing to
cas...@state.gov
i see lots of these,
2022-10-05T17:30:08.780807-04:00 mx03 postfix/qmgr[1392]: 4MjvVm57Jhz3n:
from=, size=7604, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
2022-10-05T17:30:08.781256-04:00 mx03
postfix/submit-from-local/smtpd[847
In my case, a single alias was used that expands to 5000 or more addresses in a
virtual_alias_maps table (after increasing virtual_alias_expansion_limit).
The error is reproduced both when sending an email to this alias address and when just
checking with 'sendmail -bv'.
John
On 10/6/22 16:3
Wietse Venema:
> > So it seems this issue occurs whenever the mail queue total recipient count
> > reaches 5000
> > addresses.
>
> Thanks, that is very useful. This appears to be a corner-case error,
> and that would explain why the problem was difficult to reproduce.
This reproduces 100% with
John Alex.:
> Hi, I encountered the same issue on two FreeBSD 13.1 + Postfix 3.7.2
> installations. It
> only occurs when trying to send an email with >4999 recipients (the mail
> queue is
> otherwise empty). This issue does not happen on another machine with FreeBSD
> 13.0 +
> Postfix 3.6.3.
> This is not a constructive way to disagree.
Indeed. Please accept my apologies for being rude.
And also being wrong. OpenBSDs acme-client clearly has "#define KBITS 4096".
Olaf
Hi, I encountered the same issue on two FreeBSD 13.1 + Postfix 3.7.2 installations. It
only occurs when trying to send an email with >4999 recipients (the mail queue is
otherwise empty). This issue does not happen on another machine with FreeBSD 13.0 +
Postfix 3.6.3.
After some search I found
15 matches
Mail list logo