Re: postscreen_dnsbl_sites precedence

2022-03-12 Thread Wietse Venema
Matt Saladna: > Is there any difference other than cognitive load between the two forms? > > postscreen_dnsbl_sites = > zen.spamhaus.org=127.[0..255].[0..254].[0..255]*2 > zen.spamhaus.org=127.255.255.[252;254;255]*0 This explicitly assigns weights. > versus > > post

Re: postscreen_dnsbl_sites precedence

2022-03-12 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
/> The implemenation is order-dependent./ On 12.03.22 11:56, Wietse Venema wrote: It does store the configuration in reverse order. However upon closer reading of code that I haven't touched in 10+ years... You are correct in that it applies all patterns that match. The implementation simply a

Re: postscreen_dnsbl_sites precedence

2022-03-12 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 12.03.22 11:50, Matt Saladna wrote: Is there any difference other than cognitive load between the two forms? postscreen_dnsbl_sites = zen.spamhaus.org=127.[0..255].[0..254].[0..255]*2 zen.spamhaus.org=127.255.255.[252;254;255]*0 versus postscreen_dnsbl_sites = zen.

Re: postscreen_dnsbl_sites precedence

2022-03-12 Thread Wietse Venema
Matt Saladna: > For Wieste, That is WieTSe, if you don't mind. > > /> The implemenation is order-dependent./ It does store the configuration in reverse order. However upon closer reading of code that I haven't touched in 10+ years... You are correct in that it applies all patterns that match. T