Viktor Dukhovni:
> > On 28 Jan 2022, at 4:46 pm, raf wrote:
> >
> >> Well for things like "import_environment" or "proxy_read_maps", ...
> >> you really do want to know just the additions to the built-in
> >> defaults.
> >
> > Good point.
>
> Of course a cheap cop out to handle just these speci
> On 28 Jan 2022, at 4:46 pm, raf wrote:
>
>> Well for things like "import_environment" or "proxy_read_maps", ...
>> you really do want to know just the additions to the built-in
>> defaults.
>
> Good point.
Of course a cheap cop out to handle just these special cases is
to include an extension
On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 04:14:39PM -0500, Viktor Dukhovni
wrote:
> > On 28 Jan 2022, at 4:05 pm, raf wrote:
> >
> > nd if += is added, people will expect -= as well.
> > And it suddenly makes the order of parameter settings
> > significant.
>
> Sorry, I disagree. That has much more limited u
> On 28 Jan 2022, at 4:05 pm, raf wrote:
>
> nd if += is added, people will expect -= as well.
> And it suddenly makes the order of parameter settings
> significant.
Sorry, I disagree. That has much more limited utility, but
order still does not matter, because we're subtracting from
the *de
On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 05:09:38PM -0500, Wietse Venema
wrote:
> Viktor Dukhovni:
> > It is unfortunate that Postfix does not support "+=" main.cf settings
> > that augment the default value of a given parameter. In the case
>
> The semantics have not been worked out. Below is an attempt.
>
>
Release 0.3 brings the following changes:
* Output data is now correctly rendered as JSON instead of a Python
dict, except for raw queue IDs.
* Simplified installation process. In addition to pip based setup, an
installation BASH script is now provided. The script can either be
downloa
On 2022-01-27 at 16:47:23 UTC-0500 (Thu, 27 Jan 2022 22:47:23 +0100)
Víctor Rubiella Monfort
is rumored to have said:
Thanks a lot Wietse and Viktor for quick and util responses!.
bent smtpprox samples are so useful it's just what i was looking for.
Consider recheck doc link on this page
htt
On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 09:41:40AM +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> the delay is not a problem for remote servers, they can wait a few minutes
> without problems (rfc 5321 section 4.5.3.2.6. explains that the DATA timeout
> should be 10 minutes)
Sure, but there's no Internet police, and a b
On 27.01.22 22:47, Víctor Rubiella Monfort wrote:
bent smtpprox samples are so useful it's just what i was looking for.
Consider recheck doc link on this page
http://www.postfix.org/FILTER_README.html because is not upgraded
(it's ok on http://www.postfix.org/SMTPD_PROXY_README.html).
Conside
