Dropping support for the amavis scanner is not (currently) an option,
so that use case remains valid; I'd sure be open to ideas for how to
resolve that without the use of recipient verification.
Do you have a way to validate these addresses like doing an sql lookup?
I can't suggest an actual so
On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 11:47:22AM -0600, Jesse Norell wrote:
> I am trying to utilize 'reject_unverified_recipient' selectively, so
> that only addresses for domains which I host are verified, ahead of
> permitting sasl senders, in order to avoid bounces for unknown
> recipients of local domains.
Thank you for the reply. Yes, I am familiar with
reject_unlisted_recipient and the differences with
reject_unverified_recipient. I help maintain a server control panel
(ISPConfig), and we had a use case where recipient address verification
for local domains was used as a solution to avoid genera
I am trying to utilize 'reject_unverified_recipient' selectively, so
that only addresses for domains which I host are verified
I might not be understanding your goals, but if you only want to verify
email accounts that the server is final destination for you don't want
to be using reject_unv
I note my Subject is inconsistent; I originally tried the forward as a
virtual alias with the same result (verification of the external
forward address, not the recipient address), then changed to virtual
mailboxes.
On Fri, 2021-08-27 at 11:47 -0600, Jesse Norell wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am tryin
Hello,
I am trying to utilize 'reject_unverified_recipient' selectively, so
that only addresses for domains which I host are verified, ahead of
permitting sasl senders, in order to avoid bounces for unknown
recipients of local domains. In summary, the setup seems to work
correctly for mailboxes
post...@ptld.com:
> >> Verify(8) wont attempt to retry timeouts until the
> >> address_verify_negative_refresh_time has lapsed? Correct? Anyway
> >> around
> >> this so timeouts would be re-tried on each delivery attempt? Or would
> >> I
> >> have to disable the negative database? Is there a diff
