AW: Rewrite 'Message-Id' to "Message-ID"

2021-08-22 Thread rudolf
Viktor and Bastian thank you. Mit freundlichen Grüßen Yours sincerely Pascal Rudolf -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org Im Auftrag von Bastian Blank Gesendet: Montag, 23. August 2021 08:40 An: postfix-users@postfix.org Betreff: Re: Rewrite 'Message-Id' to "M

Re: Rewrite 'Message-Id' to "Message-ID"

2021-08-22 Thread Bastian Blank
Hi On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 08:31:39AM +0200, rud...@padaru.de wrote: > recently we have noticed, that our postfix add a lowercase ‚d‘ when he > append value missing Headers, concrete i mean to the mail by the Message-Id > value. Is there a simple and less error way to change this behavior? So tha

Re: Rewrite 'Message-Id' to "Message-ID"

2021-08-22 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
> On 23 Aug 2021, at 2:31 am, wrote: > > recently we have noticed, that our postfix add a lowercase ‚d‘ when he append > value missing Headers, concrete i mean to the mail by the Message-Id value. > Is there a simple and less error way to change this behavior? So that our > mails comply with

Rewrite 'Message-Id' to "Message-ID"

2021-08-22 Thread rudolf
Good morning admins, recently we have noticed, that our postfix add a lowercase ‚d‘ when he append value missing Headers, concrete i mean to the mail by the Message-Id value. Is there a simple and less error way to change this behavior? So that our mails comply with the rfc. Mit freundlich

Re: address_verify_*_*_time

2021-08-22 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Sun, Aug 22, 2021 at 02:51:02PM -0400, post...@ptld.com wrote: > So another way to look at it... > > address_verify_positive_refresh_time > Is when the cached data becomes stale and any mail event after > this time would cause another address query to refresh the cached > data.

Re: address_verify_*_*_time

2021-08-22 Thread postfix
On 08-22-2021 1:49 pm, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: Cached data is used until it *expires*. When a cache hit is *found* it is immediately used to determine the address status. If however, the refresh timer has expired, a new probe is sent to try to bring the cache up to date. The key difference from

Re: address_verify_*_*_time

2021-08-22 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Sun, Aug 22, 2021 at 12:42:26PM -0400, post...@ptld.com wrote: > With address_verify_*_*_time im not understanding the difference in > behavior between refresh and expire. The manual says: Cached data is used until it *expires*. When a cache hit is *found* it is immediately used to determine

Re: address_verify_*_*_time

2021-08-22 Thread Wietse Venema
post...@ptld.com: > With address_verify_*_*_time im not understanding the difference in > behavior between refresh and expire. The manual says: > > "parameters that control how long address verification results are > cached before they need to be refreshed, and how long results can remain > unr

address_verify_*_*_time

2021-08-22 Thread postfix
With address_verify_*_*_time im not understanding the difference in behavior between refresh and expire. The manual says: "parameters that control how long address verification results are cached before they need to be refreshed, and how long results can remain unrefreshed before they expire"

Re: Hostname DNS error

2021-08-22 Thread Gerald Galster
> Could it be a transient DNS/network problem? If it only You can check which nameservers are responsible: 1) with dns (/etc/resolv.conf) [user@server ~]$ dig +short radio-z.net ns robotns3.second-ns.com. ns1.first-ns.de. robotns2.second-ns.de. 2) with dns (tracing from dns root, asking every na