Runtime detection of DNSSEC support
This update improves the reporting of DNSSEC problems that may
affect DANE security. DNSSEC support may unavailable because of
local configuration, libc incompatibility, or other infrastructure
issues. This was backported from Postfix 3.6.
Background: DNSSEC va
On Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 11:02:51AM -0500, Alex wrote:
> I have a postfix-3.5.8 system with amavisd on fedora33. I'm trying to
> get an idea of how many emails are queued because they can't be
> delivered in a timely manner by analyzing the logs, instead of just
> periodically running "mailq" in a
Tom Sommer:
> On 2021-01-17 17:29, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> >> On 2021-01-17 14:22, Wietse Venema wrote:
> >> >> I just observed Postfix not picking up changes in the SASL auth
> >> >> backend,
> >> >> is there some kind of cache involved here?
> >> >
> >> > There is no such thing in Postfix. Also
I just observed Postfix not picking up changes in the SASL auth
backend,
is there some kind of cache involved here?
On 2021-01-17 14:22, Wietse Venema wrote:
There is no such thing in Postfix. Also not in the Postfix Dovcecot
client.
Curious, and it couldn't be connection cache/reuse or som
On 2021-01-17 18:08, Tom Sommer wrote:
On 2021-01-17 17:29, Wietse Venema wrote:
On 2021-01-17 14:22, Wietse Venema wrote:
>> I just observed Postfix not picking up changes in the SASL auth
>> backend,
>> is there some kind of cache involved here?
>
> There is no such thing in Postfix. Also n
On 2021-01-17 17:29, Wietse Venema wrote:
On 2021-01-17 14:22, Wietse Venema wrote:
>> I just observed Postfix not picking up changes in the SASL auth
>> backend,
>> is there some kind of cache involved here?
>
> There is no such thing in Postfix. Also not in the Postfix Dovcecot
> client.
Curi
On 1/16/21 4:04 PM, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
Dnia 16.01.2021 o godz. 15:11:58 Gary Aitken pisze:
1. Why is it attempting to send mail on port 25 and not 587?
Because that's the usual port MTA tries to connect to when sending mail. You
didn't specify anywhere in your configuration that there shou
Tom Sommer:
>
>
> On 2021-01-17 14:22, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Tom Sommer:
> >> Hi all
> >>
> >> I just observed Postfix not picking up changes in the SASL auth
> >> backend,
> >> is there some kind of cache involved here?
> >
> > There is no such thing in Postfix. Also not in the Postfix Dov
Hi,
I have a postfix-3.5.8 system with amavisd on fedora33. I'm trying to
get an idea of how many emails are queued because they can't be
delivered in a timely manner by analyzing the logs, instead of just
periodically running "mailq" in a script. Is this possible?
This log entry, for example, ap
On January 17, 2021 2:32:49 PM GMT+01:00, Tom Sommer wrote:
>
>
>On 2021-01-17 14:22, Wietse Venema wrote:
>> Tom Sommer:
>>> Hi all
>>>
>>> I just observed Postfix not picking up changes in the SASL auth
>>> backend,
>>> is there some kind of cache involved here?
>>
>> There is no such thin
On 2021-01-17 14:22, Wietse Venema wrote:
Tom Sommer:
Hi all
I just observed Postfix not picking up changes in the SASL auth
backend,
is there some kind of cache involved here?
There is no such thing in Postfix. Also not in the Postfix Dovcecot
client.
Curious, and it couldn't be conn
Tom Sommer:
> Hi all
>
> I just observed Postfix not picking up changes in the SASL auth backend,
> is there some kind of cache involved here?
There is no such thing in Postfix. Also not in the Postfix Dovcecot client.
Wietse
> I had to restart postfix in
> order for it to see that a
Demi M. Obenour:
> >> I am not sure whether adding such a feature motivated by just the
> >> presented use-case is warranted.
> >
> > My take: not if it only solves only one problem.
>
> I agree. In particular, we should avoid a pile of features with very
> narrow use-cases.
I think that this n
On 1/16/21 5:12 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Viktor Dukhovni:
>> On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 04:48:22AM -0500, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 08:14:34AM +, Alexander wrote:
>>>
My goal is to conditionally select the relayhost based on the total size
of the outgoing m
Hi all
I just observed Postfix not picking up changes in the SASL auth backend,
is there some kind of cache involved here? I had to restart postfix in
order for it to see that a (spamming) SASL account no-longer existed,
even though the Dovecot auth-backend was aware of this.
Thanks.
--
Tom
15 matches
Mail list logo
