On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 09:35:51AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Some of our customers wanted us to forward all emails sent to some
> > recipient domains to 3rd party relay servers instead of the mail
> > server defined in the recipient domain's MX records.
> >
> > Also they provided smtp u
Viktor Dukhovni wrote in
<20200823024200.go37...@straasha.imrryr.org>:
|On Sun, Aug 23, 2020 at 02:36:51AM +0200, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
...
|I think that there's a major semantic problem here. The code validating
|the certificate chain against some issuer(s) trusted to identify local
|user
I built a maillog post processor that looks for 'status=sent' for
realy=.*\.outlook.com and collects to=<.*@(.*)> which is the domain
portion of the email addresses. These domains are placed in a
frequency array and sorted from highest to lowest. The highest
frequency is hotmail.com as you would e
Hello and good evening!
Please excuse the late replay.
Wietse Venema wrote in
<4bzhbq2rngzj...@spike.porcupine.org>:
|Viktor Dukhovni:
|> On Sun, Aug 23, 2020 at 02:36:51AM +0200, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
...
|Annd if you must pass additional information to the Dovecot auth
|server, the prop
Greg Sims:
> Here are the stats from this morning:
> * email arrival rate: 250/minute
> * outlook.com email sent: 7,088
> * MaxConnections: 6
If this happens 6 times, why not let Postfix retry delivery later?
Wietse
Zsombor B:
> Hi All,
>
> I need your thoughts.
>
> Some of our customers wanted us to forward all emails sent to some
> recipient domains to 3rd party relay servers instead of the mail
> server defined in the recipient domain's MX records.
>
> Also they provided smtp username and password fo
Wietse Venema schrieb am 23.08.20 um 14:14:05 Uhr:
> > > >> with postfix version 2.11.11?
> > > >
> > > > You are running some Frankenstein Postfix, perhaps with features
> > > > backported by RHEL. Such backports are NOT part of the official
> > > > Postfix release, and are NOT SUPPORTED.
