On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 12:05:27AM +0300, Dima Veselov wrote:
> > The "uid" attribute is too "flat" for use in routing email to
> > distributed mail stores. Therefore you need a second
> > email-address-valued attribute that holds the destination mailbox
> > address:
> >
> > uid: ivan
> >
On 29.06.2020 21:22, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
I have a domain, let's say example.com and my virtual users (stored in
LDAP) are located in different cities. I would like to store their mail
closer to them and we have enough servers. My question is - what is the
best practice to configure users to ac
for anyone interested, 'spamassassin-milter'
https://gitlab.com/glts/spamassassin-milter
a modern/current, rust-coded, SpamAssassin milter -- that cleanly submits msgs
via spamc to spamd -- is, for me, working quite nicely with current/latest
Postfix.
it appears to be lightweight, fast
On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 08:15:36PM +0300, Dima Veselov wrote:
> I have a domain, let's say example.com and my virtual users (stored in
> LDAP) are located in different cities. I would like to store their mail
> closer to them and we have enough servers. My question is - what is the
> best practice
Greetings,
I have a domain, let's say example.com and my virtual users (stored in
LDAP) are located in different cities. I would like to store their mail
closer to them and we have enough servers. My question is - what is the
best practice to configure users to achieve that?
My current configura
[An on-line version of this announcement will be available at
http://www.postfix.org/announcements/postfix-3.5.4.html]
Fixed in Postfix 3.5.4, 3.4.14:
* The connection_reuse attribute in smtp_tls_policy_maps always
resulted in an "invalid attribute name" error. Fix by Thorsten
Habich.