Scott Kitterman wrote:
> Those are both good points, but it's also worth noting that typically
> submission requires SMTP Auth which you will have to configure manually after
> doing the above.
Right. But there are many good guides on the net available that
describe setting up SMTP Auth in deta
On Wednesday, June 17, 2020 12:39:06 AM EDT Bob Proulx wrote:
> It resulted in this configuration entry.
>
> root@turmoil:~# postconf relayhost
> relayhost = smtp.proulx.com:587
>
> And so it is possible to use that Debian specific installation
> option. Any more details here should be o
Gary Aitken wrote:
> Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Perhaps you're better of with
> > - uninstall Postfix
> > - reinstall Postfix
> >
> > and only after doing that edit Postfix config files.
>
> A simple uninstall and reinstall of postfix could not be used, as the
> uninstall
> would remove another pack
On 6/16/20 9:49 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Tuesday, June 16, 2020 11:36:27 PM EDT Gary Aitken wrote:
It is using default mail port, 25; I need port 465 or 587 because
it's my understanding google blocks everything on port 25. During
the setup, I was not (I don't think) given the option of
spe
On Tuesday, June 16, 2020 11:36:27 PM EDT Gary Aitken wrote:
> It is using default mail port, 25; I need port 465 or 587 because it's my
> understanding google blocks everything on port 25.
> During the setup, I was not (I don't think) given the option of specifying
> smtps or the port.
There's no
On 6/12/20 12:26 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Gary Aitken:
I had previously edited main.cf to set
sendmail_path = /usr/sbin/sendmail
setgid_group = postdrop
$ sudo postfix check
postfix: fatal: bad string length 0 < 1: mailq_path =
Not sure what mailq_path should be set to... /var/spool/po
Hi,
I'm cleaning up my postfix configs and am wondering if I can improve /
should change my _restrictions on postfix 3.3 / 3.5:
local postfix instance:
smtpd_client_restrictions =
permit_mynetworks
permit_sasl_authenticated
smtpd_helo_restrictions =
permit_mynetworks
permit_sa
vi...@vheuser.com:
> On 2020/06/16 13:42 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > vi...@vheuser.com:
> >> Obviously I am above my pay grade here,
> >> but can this? "Adding some artificial 'cost' value" currently be done?
> > No. There is an existing solution that works for multi-recipient
> > list mail. That
On 2020/06/16 13:42 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
vi...@vheuser.com:
Obviously I am above my pay grade here,
but can this? "Adding some artificial 'cost' value" currently be done?
No. There is an existing solution that works for multi-recipient
list mail. That solution does not work for single-recip
vi...@vheuser.com:
> Obviously I am above my pay grade here,
> but can this? "Adding some artificial 'cost' value" currently be done?
No. There is an existing solution that works for multi-recipient
list mail. That solution does not work for single-recipient list mail,
which we suspect is your use
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 01:25:41PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > I will look up how to create transports and assign mail to them.
> > But it appears that there would be no way to redirect what is
> > already in the queue.
If you already have a lot of messages in the "active" queue, then those
a
vi...@vheuser.com:
> Postfix steadily delivers, but would like to de-prioritize the list emails
> so regular traffic is not delayed.
That's what we're talking about - making that automatic so you
don't have to babysit Postfix. Otherwise, we'd be wasting everyone's
time.
> I will look up how to c
On 2020/06/16 10:39 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Viktor Dukhovni:
On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 08:25:31PM -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
Postfix has only one queue, and concurrency and process count is
per-destination, not based on where the mail came from.
Consider using a separate postfix instance for d
On 2020/06/16 11:32 AM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Jun 16, 2020, at 12:39 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
- Adding layer of sender-based round-robin selection. Not sure if
that would explode at large scale.
When the input mix approximates steady-state, FIFO is essentially optimal,
with each type of
Viktor Dukhovni:
> > On Jun 16, 2020, at 12:39 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> >
> > - Adding layer of sender-based round-robin selection. Not sure if
> > that would explode at large scale.
>
> When the input mix approximates steady-state, FIFO is essentially optimal,
> with each type of message gett
> On Jun 16, 2020, at 12:39 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> - Adding layer of sender-based round-robin selection. Not sure if
> that would explode at large scale.
When the input mix approximates steady-state, FIFO is essentially optimal,
with each type of message getting its average share of the ou
Viktor Dukhovni:
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 08:25:31PM -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
>
> > Postfix has only one queue, and concurrency and process count is
> > per-destination, not based on where the mail came from.
> >
> > Consider using a separate postfix instance for delivering mail list
> > message
17 matches
Mail list logo
