> On May 24, 2020, at 7:21 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> Charles Sprickman:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I have a site with a very old domain that's at the front of the
>> alphabet. For some reason (age, alphabetical order, ???) that
>> domain gets bombarded with spam before the senders make it onto
>> any
On 1 Jun 2020, at 23:28, PGNet Dev wrote:
and, have seen no immediately adverse effects in mail flow. far from
robust testing at this point
You won't see enough change in overall flow to see a difference above
regular noise.
What you need to look at is how senders actually connect.
i don'
On 3 Jun 2020, at 5:58, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 03.06.20 11:52, Paul Martin wrote:
I have many logs postfix/lmtp "deferred" like:
Jun 2 11:38:21 mail331 postfix/lmtp[17386]: A2E3212C86D:
to=, relay=none, delay=5930,
delays=2879/2862/189/0, dsn=4.4.1, status=deferred (connect to
127.
Good afternoon,
Thank you so much Wietse :) .
I got the idea… I was thinking all forked lmtp processes, could be sharing in
some manner where they were delivering mail to (in this case the same lmtp
server) and that setting lmtp_destination_concurrency_limit to one in this
example, would have
Good morning,
I have a mail scanning machine which I want to deliver clean message through
lmtp over tcp to another ip. In that other ip, imagine I have 500 mailboxes and
50 domains. How could I manage for fastly delivering a message to mailboxes
without having to be delivering recipient to rec
Egoitz Aurrekoetxea:
> Good morning,
>
> I have a mail scanning machine which I want to deliver clean message
> through lmtp over tcp to another ip. In that other ip, imagine I have 500
> mailboxes and 50 domains.
>
> How could I manage for fastly delivering a message to mailboxes without
> havin
On 03.06.20 13:04, Egoitz Aurrekoetxea wrote:
I have a mail scanning machine which I want to deliver clean message
through lmtp over tcp to another ip. In that other ip, imagine I have 500
mailboxes and 50 domains.
How could I manage for fastly delivering a message to mailboxes without
having to
Good morning,
I have a mail scanning machine which I want to deliver clean message
through lmtp over tcp to another ip. In that other ip, imagine I have 500
mailboxes and 50 domains.
How could I manage for fastly delivering a message to mailboxes without
having to be delivering recipient to recip
On June 3, 2020 11:52:10 AM GMT+02:00, Paul Martin
wrote:
>Hello,
>
>I have many logs postfix/lmtp "deferred" like:
>
>Jun 2 11:38:21 mail331 postfix/lmtp[17386]: A2E3212C86D:
>to=, relay=none, delay=5930,
>delays=2879/2862/189/0, dsn=4.4.1, status=deferred (connect to
>127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:
On 03.06.20 11:52, Paul Martin wrote:
I have many logs postfix/lmtp "deferred" like:
Jun 2 11:38:21 mail331 postfix/lmtp[17386]: A2E3212C86D:
to=, relay=none, delay=5930,
delays=2879/2862/189/0, dsn=4.4.1, status=deferred (connect to
127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:24: Connection timed out)
do you have
Hello,
I have many logs postfix/lmtp "deferred" like:
Jun 2 11:38:21 mail331 postfix/lmtp[17386]: A2E3212C86D:
to=, relay=none, delay=5930,
delays=2879/2862/189/0, dsn=4.4.1, status=deferred (connect to
127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:24: Connection timed out)
do you have a solution ?
Regards,
Paul
11 matches
Mail list logo
