HI
on 2019/8/20 14:23, Eray Aslan wrote:
etc. Fixed in Postfix 3.5. You cn delete the offending lines.
Which distro are you building on?
That was on gentoo. Sorry didnt think of checking on postfix-3.5.
Just be curious for what reasons we choose to build a software from
sources? today it's
On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 08:51:47AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Eray Aslan:
> > dns_str_resflags.c:63:22: error: ?RES_INSECURE1? undeclared here (not in a
> > function); did you mean ?RES_RECURSE??
> >63 | "RES_INSECURE1", RES_INSECURE1,
>
> etc. Fixed in Postfix 3.5. You cn delete the o
On 19 Aug 2019, at 18:00, ko...@mailc.net wrote:
Hi
Kinda OT - as long as I didn't screw something up!
I'm just about ready to pull the trigger on moving our old Communigate
mail system to a new, self-installed Postfix system.
It's been running in test for just a coupled of users for a few
> On Aug 20, 2019, at 1:21 PM, Eliza wrote:
>
> Does postfix have a plugin who can be integrated with AWS's S3 as object
> storage? Coz for a large email service, the local disks are too limited.
Postfix is an MTA, not a mailstore. I can imagine O(1TB) disks
being too small for a multi-user ma
Hi,
on 2019/8/20 11:26, Eero Volotinen wrote:
How about using NFS in AWS?
https://aws.amazon.com/efs/
S3 can be called from remote, but not NFS. Am i right?
regards.
How about using NFS in AWS?
https://aws.amazon.com/efs/
Eero
On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 6:22 AM Eliza wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Does postfix have a plugin who can be integrated with AWS's S3 as object
> storage? Coz for a large email service, the local disks are too limited.
>
> thanks & regards,
> Eli
Hello,
Does postfix have a plugin who can be integrated with AWS's S3 as object
storage? Coz for a large email service, the local disks are too limited.
thanks & regards,
Eliza
On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 10:34:51AM +0200, Matthias Schneider wrote:
> Chris, can you tell me your postfix version/settings?
mail_version = 3.4.5
milter_protocol = 6
(not sure what other settings are relevant here)
> But postfix (3.3.0 and 3.4.5) only sends about 24 body chunks per
> second to my
Hi
Kinda OT - as long as I didn't screw something up!
I'm just about ready to pull the trigger on moving our old Communigate mail
system to a new, self-installed Postfix system.
It's been running in test for just a coupled of users for a few weeks now and
looks really good!
I got postscreen s
Matthias Schneider:
> Hi Wietse,
>
>
> > I suspect that the bottleneck is on the receiving side.
> >
> > - Maybe the loopback stack does not like the 65535 block size. Try
> > using an ethernet interface address instead.
>
> I tried switching from interface lo to eno1 - same issue.
What's the e
Hi Wietse,
I suspect that the bottleneck is on the receiving side.
- Maybe the loopback stack does not like the 65535 block size. Try
using an ethernet interface address instead.
I tried switching from interface lo to eno1 - same issue.
- Maybe the application "appends" the new content t
Eray Aslan:
> dns_str_resflags.c:63:22: error: ?RES_INSECURE1? undeclared here (not in a
> function); did you mean ?RES_RECURSE??
>63 | "RES_INSECURE1", RES_INSECURE1,
etc. Fixed in Postfix 3.5. You cn delete the offending lines.
Which distro are you building on?
Wietse
Matthias Schneider:
> After switching from tcp to unix socket, postfix as milter client is
> fast like a rocket (less than a second).
>
> Just wondering which tcp parameter causes the long delay
No idea what tweaks you have made to your machine.
Wietse
Matthias Schneider:
> Chris, can you tell me your postfix version/settings?
>
> When i do a load-test on my milter application, i can also get 100mb in
> about a second proceesed (with 65535 sized chunks).
>
> But postfix (3.3.0 and 3.4.5) only sends about 24 body chunks per second
> to my milt
glibc-2.30 removed RES_INSECURE1, RES_INSECURE2 and RES_USE_INET6
symbols[1] resulting in:
dns_str_resflags.c:55:13: warning: RES_AAONLY is deprecated
55 | "RES_AAONLY", RES_AAONLY,
| ^
dns_str_resflags.c:57:13: warning: RES_PRIMARY is deprecated
After switching from tcp to unix socket, postfix as milter client is
fast like a rocket (less than a second).
Just wondering which tcp parameter causes the long delay
Matthias Schneider
Am 19.08.19 um 10:34 schrieb Matthias Schneider:
Chris, can you tell me your postfix version/settings?
Chris, can you tell me your postfix version/settings?
When i do a load-test on my milter application, i can also get 100mb in
about a second proceesed (with 65535 sized chunks).
But postfix (3.3.0 and 3.4.5) only sends about 24 body chunks per second
to my milter application. Its the only mil
17 matches
Mail list logo
