Re: Weird behavior with postfix and dovecot-lmtp

2019-08-11 Thread Coy Hile
On 2019-08-11 12:39, Coy Hile wrote: For posterity's sake, this was a misconfiguration in postfix. virtual_mailbox_domains = pgsql:/opt/local/etc/postfix/postfix_virtual_domains.cf Turns out this was an error in that query. I'd missed a term, so that returned something (which implies "this do

Re: Weird behavior with postfix and dovecot-lmtp

2019-08-11 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 12:39:40PM -0400, Coy Hile wrote: > canonical_maps = hash:/opt/local/etc/postfix/canonical What does this do? > recipient_canonical_maps = hash:/opt/local/etc/postfix/recipient_canonical > sender_canonical_maps = hash:/opt/local/etc/postfix/sender_canonical This is rarel

Re: Format of ip address in /etc/postfix/access

2019-08-11 Thread Wietse Venema
Durga Prasad Malyala: > On Sun, 11 Aug 2019 at 20:13, Ralph Seichter wrote: > > > > * Durga Prasad Malyala: > > > > > they are providing a list but it is in the format 089.248.172.085 > > > > You did notice the comments "DO NOT USE AS BLOCKLIST" and "Please use > > your API instead. See https://is

Weird behavior with postfix and dovecot-lmtp

2019-08-11 Thread Coy Hile
Hi all, I’ve posed this question to the dovecot mailing list as well, but I’m asking here also because I think this more likely something that I’ve missed or misconfigured in postfix than dovecot. Sending mail from a local address to gmail, I’d expect it to be forwarded through the configured

Re: Format of ip address in /etc/postfix/access

2019-08-11 Thread Durga Prasad Malyala
On Sun, 11 Aug 2019 at 21:21, Durga Prasad Malyala wrote: > > On Sun, 11 Aug 2019 at 20:13, Ralph Seichter wrote: > > > > * Durga Prasad Malyala: > > > > > they are providing a list but it is in the format 089.248.172.085 > > > > You did notice the comments "DO NOT USE AS BLOCKLIST" and "Please u

Re: Format of ip address in /etc/postfix/access

2019-08-11 Thread Durga Prasad Malyala
On Sun, 11 Aug 2019 at 20:13, Ralph Seichter wrote: > > * Durga Prasad Malyala: > > > they are providing a list but it is in the format 089.248.172.085 > > You did notice the comments "DO NOT USE AS BLOCKLIST" and "Please use > your API instead. See https://isc.sans.edu/api";, did you not? > > -Ra

Re: Format of ip address in /etc/postfix/access

2019-08-11 Thread Benny Pedersen
Durga Prasad Malyala skrev den 2019-08-11 16:27: well Andrew - I am interested in using a list from https://dshield.org/ipsascii.html reading line 2 of that url, how would you use it in postfix ?

Re: Format of ip address in /etc/postfix/access

2019-08-11 Thread Ralph Seichter
* Durga Prasad Malyala: > they are providing a list but it is in the format 089.248.172.085 You did notice the comments "DO NOT USE AS BLOCKLIST" and "Please use your API instead. See https://isc.sans.edu/api";, did you not? -Ralph

Re: Format of ip address in /etc/postfix/access

2019-08-11 Thread Durga Prasad Malyala
On Sun, 11 Aug 2019 at 14:38, Andrew Bernard wrote: > > Hello Durga, > > I think that's a strange way to write an IP address. > > If you do man 3 inet_addr the format for the dotted address is explained. As > stated in that man page: > > In all of the above forms, components of the dotted address

Re: Format of ip address in /etc/postfix/access

2019-08-11 Thread Richard Damon
On 8/11/19 3:49 AM, Rich Wales wrote: > The best English phrase to use here would be "unnecessary leading zeroes". > > Rich Wales > ri...@richw.org > I suspect that it also doesn't allow embedded spaces or other extraneous characters (leading 0s and blanks likely being the most common) -- Richard

Re: Format of ip address in /etc/postfix/access

2019-08-11 Thread Andrew Bernard
Hello Durga, I think that's a strange way to write an IP address. If you do man 3 inet_addr the format for the dotted address is explained. As stated in that man page: In all of the above forms, components of the dotted address can be specified in decimal, octal (with a  leading 0),  or

Re: Format of ip address in /etc/postfix/access

2019-08-11 Thread Dominic Raferd
On Sun, 11 Aug 2019 at 08:51, Rich Wales wrote: > The best English phrase to use here would be "unnecessary leading zeroes". > or just: 'leading zeroes' BTW I read at https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/STCMML8/com.ibm.storage.ts3500.doc/opg_3584_IPv4_IPv6_addresses.html that leading

Re: Format of ip address in /etc/postfix/access

2019-08-11 Thread Rich Wales
The best English phrase to use here would be "unnecessary leading zeroes". Rich Wales ri...@richw.org

Re: Format of ip address in /etc/postfix/access

2019-08-11 Thread Jan Ceuleers
On 10/08/2019 23:22, Wietse Venema wrote: > NOTE 1: The access map lookup key must be in canonical form: DO > NOT SPECIFY UNNECESSARY NULL CHARACTERS, and do not enclose net- > work address information with "[]" characters. > > Emphasis added for clarity.