Re: Duplicate mail servers again

2019-07-15 Thread Durga Prasad Malyala
On Tue, Jul 16, 2019, 01:02 Homer Wilson Smith wrote: > > Is there an easy way for postfix receiving incoming mail > on servier1 to simply mail a copy to an identical server2 for a duplicate > spool, or is that ridiculous. > > Purpose is simply to have an emergency incoming spool that n

Re: SPF failure

2019-07-15 Thread @lbutlr
On 15 Jul 2019, at 13:44, Phil Stracchino wrote: > > On 7/15/19 3:29 PM, Bill Cole wrote: >> On 15 Jul 2019, at 14:02, Phil Stracchino wrote: >>> And here's the log of the last failure: >> >> [...] >>> Jul 15 13:49:11 minbar policyd-spf[25139]: Starting >>> Jul 15 13:49:11 minbar policyd-spf[251

Re: SPF failure

2019-07-15 Thread Phil Stracchino
On 7/15/19 4:56 PM, Bill Cole wrote: > On 15 Jul 2019, at 15:44, Phil Stracchino wrote: >> The question that comes to mind here is, if one should not reject mail >> based on SPF failures, then what is even the point of checking SPF? > > A test of SPF can have exactly one out of a fixed set of 7 p

Re: SPF failure

2019-07-15 Thread Bill Cole
On 15 Jul 2019, at 15:44, Phil Stracchino wrote: On 7/15/19 3:29 PM, Bill Cole wrote: On 15 Jul 2019, at 14:02, Phil Stracchino wrote: And here's the log of the last failure: [...] Jul 15 13:49:11 minbar policyd-spf[25139]: Starting Jul 15 13:49:11 minbar policyd-spf[25139]: Config: {'debug

Re: SPF failure

2019-07-15 Thread Phil Stracchino
On 7/15/19 4:08 PM, Noel Jones wrote: > On 7/15/2019 2:44 PM, Phil Stracchino wrote: >> >> The question that comes to mind here is, if one should not reject mail >> based on SPF failures, then what is even the point of checking SPF? > > Please distinguish between "SPF check failed because this is

Re: Duplicate mail servers again

2019-07-15 Thread Wietse Venema
Homer Wilson Smith: > > Is there an easy way for postfix receiving incoming mail > on servier1 to simply mail a copy to an identical server2 for a duplicate > spool, or is that ridiculous. > > Purpose is simply to have an emergency incoming spool that noone > ever looks at on a duplicat

Re: SPF failure

2019-07-15 Thread Noel Jones
On 7/15/2019 2:44 PM, Phil Stracchino wrote: On 7/15/19 3:29 PM, Bill Cole wrote: On 15 Jul 2019, at 14:02, Phil Stracchino wrote: And here's the log of the last failure: [...] Jul 15 13:49:11 minbar policyd-spf[25139]: Starting Jul 15 13:49:11 minbar policyd-spf[25139]: Config: {'debugLevel

Re: SPF failure

2019-07-15 Thread Michael
According to this site, websitewelcome has 10 lookups on its own: https://emailstuff.org/spf/check The websitewelcome spf record includes the google spf record, so forevermetalroof.com shouldn't need the mx in their spf. The emailstuff.org tool has an SPF minimizer that looks interesting. Bu

Re: SPF failure

2019-07-15 Thread Phil Stracchino
On 7/15/19 3:29 PM, Bill Cole wrote: > On 15 Jul 2019, at 14:02, Phil Stracchino wrote: >> And here's the log of the last failure: > > [...] >> Jul 15 13:49:11 minbar policyd-spf[25139]: Starting >> Jul 15 13:49:11 minbar policyd-spf[25139]: Config: {'debugLevel': 3, >> 'HELO_reject': 'SPF_Not_Pas

Re: SPF failure

2019-07-15 Thread Phil Stracchino
On 7/15/19 3:12 PM, Fazzina, Angelo wrote: > When you plug your domain [forevermetalroof.com] in here you see too many > lookups explained better Yeah, that's what I figured out and several others pointed out. Looks like the problem is the company's mail hosting, and their IT guy is working on

Duplicate mail servers again

2019-07-15 Thread Homer Wilson Smith
Is there an easy way for postfix receiving incoming mail on servier1 to simply mail a copy to an identical server2 for a duplicate spool, or is that ridiculous. Purpose is simply to have an emergency incoming spool that noone ever looks at on a duplicate mail machine in case one dies to

Re: SPF failure

2019-07-15 Thread Bill Cole
On 15 Jul 2019, at 14:02, Phil Stracchino wrote: I have mail from one specific domain (handled by Google) being rejected by pypolicyd-spf because of an apparent DNS lookup problem — 'SPF Permanent Error: Too many DNS lookups' That should not cause rejection. It should be the equivalent of not

RE: SPF failure

2019-07-15 Thread Fazzina, Angelo
When you plug your domain [forevermetalroof.com] in here you see too many lookups explained better https://dmarcian.com/spf-survey/ limit is 10. -ANGELO FAZZINA ang...@uconn.edu University of Connecticut,  ITS, SSG, Server Systems 860-486-9075 -Original Message- From: owner-postfix-us

SPF failure

2019-07-15 Thread Phil Stracchino
I have mail from one specific domain (handled by Google) being rejected by pypolicyd-spf because of an apparent DNS lookup problem — 'SPF Permanent Error: Too many DNS lookups' — but it is not obvious to me what the problem is, unless it's something to do with having five MX forwarders to look up.

postfix smtp auth with active directory

2019-07-15 Thread Wakefield, Robin
Hi , Is there any document for postfix smtp auth with active directory. I have followed below document . https://www.howtoforge.com/postfix-dovecot-authentication-against-active-directory-on-centos-5.x I am getting authentication failure while authenticating and logs says as below. saslauthd[942