Re: Postfix update resulted in mails going to spam?

2019-06-13 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
> On Jun 14, 2019, at 2:14 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote: > > Did you check your mail logs for any warnings or errors? If you reuse a > postfix 2.7 configuration with postfix 3.1, I'm not certain it's completely > compatible. Nothing major enough to cause the reported symptoms. The only things th

Re: Postfix update resulted in mails going to spam?

2019-06-13 Thread Scott Kitterman
On June 13, 2019 2:43:53 PM UTC, John Gateley wrote: >Hello, > >I recently upgraded my mail server OS (Debian 7 to Debian 9), and at >the >same time got >the latest postfix package for Debian 9. > >It is hosted in the cloud (Linode), and I completely rebuilt the >instance, rather than >doing

Re: Postfix update resulted in mails going to spam?

2019-06-13 Thread John Gateley
On 6/13/19 10:22 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: John Gateley: Is there any reason the software upgrade would cause this behavior? I can't think of one, but the timing is very coincidental. There is no known problem with mail from Postfix ending up in SPAM folders after a Postfix update. The proble

Re: Postfix LMTP to remote LMTP server

2019-06-13 Thread Alex Evonosky
Thank you for the reply. Will remove. Sent from my Pixel 3XL On Thu, Jun 13, 2019, 5:18 PM Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > > On Jun 13, 2019, at 4:10 PM, Alex Evonosky > wrote: > > > > Thank you for the feedback, however,in my master.cf I show: > > > > #lmtp unix - - y -

Re: Postfix LMTP to remote LMTP server

2019-06-13 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
> On Jun 13, 2019, at 4:10 PM, Alex Evonosky wrote: > > Thank you for the feedback, however,in my master.cf I show: > > #lmtp unix - - y - - lmtp > lmtp inet n n n - - lmtp -v > > I only enabled the lmtp inet.. You MUST

Re: Postfix LMTP to remote LMTP server

2019-06-13 Thread Wietse Venema
alexevon: > Jun 13 02:51:10 alpha postfix/local[17763]: fatal: connect #11 to > subsystem private/lmtp: Connection refused Wietse: > You don't have an LMTP client > > lmtp unix .. .. .. .. .. lmtp > > in your master.cf file, or your SeLinux/AppArmor/whatever 'security' > policy is not configur

Re: Postfix LMTP to remote LMTP server

2019-06-13 Thread Alex Evonosky
disregard, I see what you mean.. to un-comment it.. I did that and it works now! Thank you again! Alex On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 4:10 PM Alex Evonosky wrote: > Thank you for the feedback, however,in my master.cf I show: > > #lmtp unix - - y - - lmtp > lmtp

Re: Postfix LMTP to remote LMTP server

2019-06-13 Thread Alex Evonosky
Thank you for the feedback, however,in my master.cf I show: #lmtp unix - - y - - lmtp lmtp inet n n n - - lmtp -v I only enabled the lmtp inet.. I am not running any SElinux or the like on this server... Thank you.

Re: Postfix LMTP to remote LMTP server

2019-06-13 Thread Wietse Venema
alexevon: > Jun 13 02:51:10 alpha postfix/local[17763]: fatal: connect #11 to > subsystem private/lmtp: Connection refused You don't have an LMTP client lmtp unix .. .. .. .. .. lmtp in your master.cf file, or your SeLinux/AppArmor/whatever 'security' policy is not configured correctly.

Postfix LMTP to remote LMTP server

2019-06-13 Thread alexevon
Hello- Been trying to set Postfix to deliver mail via LMTP to a remote LMTP server which also supports the IMAP mailstore. This remote server is on the same network. Postfix works fine by sending and receiving mail. The end goal is to take the received mail and deliver it to the remote server v

Re: spoofing to my owndomain

2019-06-13 Thread Wietse Venema
Bilal: > Hi im using Postfix MTA and i have setup SPF,DKIM,DMARC records > of my domain. Someone is spoofing my domain address like *@mydomain > to my own domain users . How can i block this using postfix ? By separating your mail streams, and by configuring Postfix to enforce DMARC policy on una

spoofing to my owndomain

2019-06-13 Thread Bilal
Hi im using Postfix MTA and i have setup SPF,DKIM,DMARC records of my domain. Someone is spoofing my domain address like *@mydomain to my own domain users . How can i block this using postfix ? -- Sent from: http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/Postfix-Users-f2.html

Re: Postfix update resulted in mails going to spam?

2019-06-13 Thread Wietse Venema
John Gateley: > Hello, > > I recently upgraded my mail server OS (Debian 7 to Debian 9), and > at the same time got the latest postfix package for Debian 9. > > It is hosted in the cloud (Linode), and I completely rebuilt the > instance, rather than doing an upgrade. The IP addresses (v4 and > v6)

Postfix update resulted in mails going to spam?

2019-06-13 Thread John Gateley
Hello, I recently upgraded my mail server OS (Debian 7 to Debian 9), and at the same time got the latest postfix package for Debian 9. It is hosted in the cloud (Linode), and I completely rebuilt the instance, rather than doing an upgrade. The IP addresses (v4 and v6) are the same. The config

Re: Milter connection limit

2019-06-13 Thread Wietse Venema
Tom Sommer: > Hi > > I'm running into problems with OpenDKIM and a 1024 libmilter connection > limit (or port-reservation limit) during peak hours. According to some source code, libmilter uses 'poll' or 'select'. To change the select() limit you'd have to recompile the library with a larger FD_

Re: Milter connection limit

2019-06-13 Thread Bastian Blank
On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 11:31:09AM +0200, Tom Sommer wrote: > I'm running into problems with OpenDKIM and a 1024 libmilter connection > limit (or port-reservation limit) during peak hours. Please show your Postfix config and logs, see http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#mail. You really have

Milter connection limit

2019-06-13 Thread Tom Sommer
Hi I'm running into problems with OpenDKIM and a 1024 libmilter connection limit (or port-reservation limit) during peak hours. Is there any way to limit/throttle the number of connections made to a milter? -- Tom

Re: Trying to resolve Client host rejected: Access denied errors

2019-06-13 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
Matus UHLAR wrote: and this looks like your client IP is rejected. On 12.06.19 19:28, David Drum wrote: Why would it be, when I am coming from mynetworks? In any case, given that That's because requiring sasl authentication means you require it unconditionally. Ports 465 and 587 should both