Not sure if this is a Dovecot or Postfix issue we use Dovecot for
authentication for Postfix. Mailboxes are stored in MySQL.
Have noticed this today:
auth-worker(42777): Info: sql(cont...@com.au,127.0.0.1): unknown user (given
password: someone123)
Also i...@com.au etc.
They are coming throug
Hello,
I would like to delete automatically User-Agent or X-Mailer information
in the headers of outgoing emails.
I have tried the header_checks, and it works, but with all emails, even
those received.
Can you tell me how to proceed, please?
Thanks,
André
--
André Rodier
HomeBox: https://gith
Hello
Can somebody help me?
So I have setup the nfs share on a windows server 2016 with nfs server role.
Security is set on the device ip of the postfix server read-write with allow
root access.
In the main conf of postfix I have set the queue to the right dir
queue_directory = /mnt/mail
fst
> For Debian and derivatives like Ubuntu, yes.
Thanks for confirmation!!!
Sincerely, Byung-Hee from South Korea.
--
^고맙습니다 _地平天成_ 감사합니다_^))//
On Tuesday, April 02, 2019 12:38:45 PM 황병희 wrote:
> i just did install postfix in Ubuntu 18.04 by `sudo apt-get install
> postfix'. then just did type `cat /etc/aliases'.
> #+BEGIN_SRC: text
> (bionic)soyeomul@localhost:~$ cat /etc/aliases
> # See man 5 aliases for format
> postmaster:root
> #+
i just did install postfix in Ubuntu 18.04 by `sudo apt-get install
postfix'. then just did type `cat /etc/aliases'.
#+BEGIN_SRC: text
(bionic)soyeomul@localhost:~$ cat /etc/aliases
# See man 5 aliases for format
postmaster:root
#+END_SRC
by the way there is no MAILER-DAEMON thing. is that nor
Thank you all, guys.
On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 2:35 PM Ángel L. Mateo wrote:
> El 30/3/19 a las 22:42, Andrew Evdokimov escribió:
> >
> >> 3. Anyway to store email attachment only once? i.e. someone sends an
> >> email with an attachment, and this email could be forwarded to another
> >> recipients
Thanks! That worked!
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org On
Behalf Of Viktor Dukhovni
Sent: Monday, April 1, 2019 12:46 PM
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: Alias and local delivery issues (Edited)
On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 05:22:08PM +, Randall R. Sargen
> On Apr 1, 2019, at 3:17 PM, John Beranek wrote:
>
> Also, I got confused between Wietse and Viktor's solutions!
Well, Wietse implemented the SMTP reply filter, and I implemented
the SASL mechanism filter, so, not surprisingly, each of us just
happened to recall the feature that he personally b
On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 10:09:13PM +0300, Andrei Kovacs wrote:
> Thank you for your explanation, I've been able to configure the SNI
> functionality. Just one issue is left, but that's maybe for a further
> improvement of postfix: it would be nice if there were a "catch-all" entry
> in the SNI map
On Mon, 1 Apr 2019 at 20:04, Noel Jones wrote:
>
> On 4/1/2019 2:01 PM, John Beranek wrote:
> > On Mon, 1 Apr 2019 at 19:55, John Beranek wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, 1 Apr 2019 at 19:47, John Beranek wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Apologies for resurrecting a somewhat old thread, but presumably the
> >>> smtp_rep
Hi Viktor,
Thank you for your explanation, I've been able to configure the SNI
functionality. Just one issue is left, but that's maybe for a further
improvement of postfix: it would be nice if there were a "catch-all" entry
in the SNI map table, like '* /path/to/cert.pem" or 'default
/path/to/cert
On 4/1/2019 2:01 PM, John Beranek wrote:
On Mon, 1 Apr 2019 at 19:55, John Beranek wrote:
On Mon, 1 Apr 2019 at 19:47, John Beranek wrote:
Apologies for resurrecting a somewhat old thread, but presumably the
smtp_reply_filter fix won't work if smtp.gmail.com is now responding like:
By the w
On Mon, 1 Apr 2019 at 19:55, John Beranek wrote:
>
> On Mon, 1 Apr 2019 at 19:47, John Beranek wrote:
> >
> > Apologies for resurrecting a somewhat old thread, but presumably the
> > smtp_reply_filter fix won't work if smtp.gmail.com is now responding like:
>
> By the way, I found this thread as I
On Mon, 1 Apr 2019 at 19:47, John Beranek wrote:
>
> Apologies for resurrecting a somewhat old thread, but presumably the
> smtp_reply_filter fix won't work if smtp.gmail.com is now responding like:
By the way, I found this thread as I started having the same issue. I
found that Wietse's "smtp_sas
Apologies for resurrecting a somewhat old thread, but presumably the
smtp_reply_filter fix won't work if smtp.gmail.com is now responding like:
$ telnet smtp.gmail.com 587
Trying 108.177.15.108...
Connected to smtp.gmail.com.
Escape character is '^]'.
220 smtp.gmail.com ESMTP b134sm26404242wmd.26
Viktor Dukhovni:
> On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 10:38:49AM -0400, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 02:09:25PM +0300, Andrei Kovacs wrote:
> >
> > > So, if I understand correctly, the configuration for the SNI file if it is
> > > in hash format should be:
> > >
> > > domain1.com st
Wietse Venema:
> > unix_dgram_connect.c: In function 'unix_dgram_connect':
> > unix_dgram_connect.c:63:24: error: expected identifier or '(' before
> > numeric constant
> > struct sockaddr_un sun;
> > ^
>
> Any idea why identical code in src/util/unix_listen.c compi
On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 05:22:08PM +, Randall R. Sargent wrote:
> I have an alias system that I need to deliver some mail via relay, and
> some locally for PAM accounts. The local PAM accounts are not in the aliases
> file and their mail is delivered successfully via dovecot-lda
> (mailbox_com
Hello,
I have an alias system that I need to deliver some mail via relay, and some
locally for PAM accounts. The local PAM accounts are not in the aliases file
and their mail is delivered successfully via dovecot-lda (mailbox_command =
/usr/libexec/dovecot/dovecot-lda -f "$SENDER" -a "$RECIPIEN
Hello,
I have an alias system that I need to deliver some mail via relay, and some
locally for PAM accounts. The local PAM accounts are not in the aliases file
and their mail is delivered successfully via dovecot-lda (mailbox_command =
/usr/libexec/dovecot/dovecot-lda -f "$SENDER" -a "$RECIPIEN
oh, right.
reading your reply, I re-discovered my local fix I use for the
SFE packaging project:
==
#fix unlucky selection of name for struct (introduced in some 3.4.x
version)
grep "struct sockaddr_un sun;" src/util/unix_dgram_connect.c \
&& gsed -i.bak_undef_sun -e '/struct sockaddr_un sun;/
On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 10:38:49AM -0400, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 02:09:25PM +0300, Andrei Kovacs wrote:
>
> > So, if I understand correctly, the configuration for the SNI file if it is
> > in hash format should be:
> >
> > domain1.com static:/path/to/pem1.pem
> > domain
On 01/04/2019 14:14, Wietse Venema wrote:
unix_dgram_connect.c: In function 'unix_dgram_connect':
unix_dgram_connect.c:63:24: error: expected identifier or '(' before
numeric constant
struct sockaddr_un sun;
^
Any idea why identical code in src/util/unix_listen.
Viktor Dukhovni:
> > On Apr 1, 2019, at 5:04 AM, Jaco Lesch wrote:
> >
> > unix_dgram_connect.c:63:24: error: expected identifier or ?(? before
> > numeric constant
> > struct sockaddr_un sun;
>
> Takes me back to my roots working with SunOS 3.x. Ever since, I've
> kept away from sin, by
> On Apr 1, 2019, at 5:04 AM, Jaco Lesch wrote:
>
> unix_dgram_connect.c:63:24: error: expected identifier or ‘(’ before numeric
> constant
> struct sockaddr_un sun;
Takes me back to my roots working with SunOS 3.x. Ever since, I've
kept away from sin, by naming unix-domain sockaddrs "s_u
On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 02:09:25PM +0300, Andrei Kovacs wrote:
> So, if I understand correctly, the configuration for the SNI file if it is
> in hash format should be:
>
> domain1.com static:/path/to/pem1.pem
> domain2.com static:/path/to/pem2.pem
That makes no sense. You're putting tables insi
Hello,
** Wietse Venema [2019-03-29 10:06:14 -0400]:
> Vladimir Lomov:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I faced with strange problem with my postfix configuration. I use the
>> postfix as SMTP client to send emails from my host. Recently I
>> changed the password on external email-server, updated file that
>> st
> unix_dgram_connect.c: In function 'unix_dgram_connect':
> unix_dgram_connect.c:63:24: error: expected identifier or '(' before
> numeric constant
> struct sockaddr_un sun;
> ^
Any idea why identical code in src/util/unix_listen.c compiles
without error?
unix_dgr
So, if I understand correctly, the configuration for the SNI file if it is
in hash format should be:
domain1.com static:/path/to/pem1.pem
domain2.com static:/path/to/pem2.pem
Is it correct? And if so, the pem1.pem and pem2.pem files should contain in
the exact order the PEMs for Private Key, Cert
[An on-line version of this announcement will be available at
http://www.postfix.org/announcements/postfix-3.4.5.html]
This update fixes 5+ year old bugs, and provides a Postfix 3.4 fix
for sites that depend on undocumented behavior.
Changes for all supported stable releases:
* Starting with P
Guys
Attempting to compile Postfix 3.4.4 on Solaris 11 with GCC 7.3.0, but I
am getting the following error when running "make makefiles":
gcc -I. -I../../include -DNO_NISPLUS -Dstrcasecmp=fix_s
32 matches
Mail list logo
