On 12/03/19 03:38, Django wrote:
RPM 4 CentOS7 are build =>
http://repo.mailserver.guru/7/testing/x86_64/repoview/index.html
And as always on Ghettoforge in the gf-testing repo:
http://ghettoforge.org/index.php/Postfix3
Please note that due to the (relatively) un-stable nature of postfix 3.4
On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 11:48:56PM +0100, A. Schulze wrote:
> I assume the changes behavior is dovecot/pigeonhole now using the advertised
> "CHUNKING" extension.
Yes.
> Reason: "Data command rejected: Multi-recipient bounce" while there is
> clearly only one recipient.
>
> Mar 11 23:27:54 di
* Viktor Dukhovni:
> Under what conditions does the milter respond with "discard"?
The trigger expression I mentioned before is tied to the "From"
header [1], like so:
konfig['regexp']['FOO_EXPR'] = { [2]
re = 'From=/user\\@domain\\.tld/Hi'
}
I verified that the expression itself is cor
Hello,
updated from 3.4.1 to 3.4.3 and at the same time dovecot-2.2 to dovecot-2.3 ( +
pigeonhole)
I assume the changes behavior is dovecot/pigeonhole now using the advertised
"CHUNKING" extension.
Now an echo service (dovecot-2.3-pigeonhole) don't send messages anymore.
Reason: "Data command r
> On Mar 11, 2019, at 6:04 PM, Ralph Seichter wrote:
>
>> When do you trigger than rule? Postfix supports 'discard', but only
>> after "MAIL FROM", not after CONNECT or EHLO.
>
> $ postconf -n | grep milter
> milter_default_action = accept
> non_smtpd_milters = unix:/run/opendkim/socket
> smtpd_
On March 11, 2019 9:29:07 PM UTC, Wietse Venema wrote:
>Scott Kitterman:
>> On Sunday, March 10, 2019 06:19:42 PM Wietse Venema wrote:
>> > Postfix stable release 3.4.2 is available.
>> >
>> > * DANE trust anchor file support was broken after the Postfix 3.4
>> > TLS library overhaul. Fi
* Viktor Dukhovni:
> When do you trigger than rule? Postfix supports 'discard', but only
> after "MAIL FROM", not after CONNECT or EHLO.
$ postconf -n | grep milter
milter_default_action = accept
non_smtpd_milters = unix:/run/opendkim/socket
smtpd_milters = unix:/run/opendkim/socket inet:localhos
Scott Kitterman:
> On Sunday, March 10, 2019 06:19:42 PM Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Postfix stable release 3.4.2 is available.
> >
> > * DANE trust anchor file support was broken after the Postfix 3.4
> > TLS library overhaul. Fix by Scott Kitterman.
>
> I'm not sure how you feel about retroa
On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 09:28:40PM +0100, Ralph Seichter wrote:
> I'm having trouble with Rspamd as a milter for Postfix, specifically
> with Rspamd's discard action:
>
> # /etc/rspamd/local.d/force_actions.conf
> rules {
> FOO_RULE {
> expression = 'FOO_EXPR',
> action = 'dis
I'm having trouble with Rspamd as a milter for Postfix, specifically
with Rspamd's discard action:
# /etc/rspamd/local.d/force_actions.conf
rules {
FOO_RULE {
expression = 'FOO_EXPR',
action = 'discard'
}
}
If I use the 'reject' action in Rspamd rules like the one shown
On Sunday, March 10, 2019 06:19:42 PM Wietse Venema wrote:
> Postfix stable release 3.4.2 is available.
>
> * DANE trust anchor file support was broken after the Postfix 3.4
> TLS library overhaul. Fix by Scott Kitterman.
I'm not sure how you feel about retroactive history revisions, but I
* Bastian Blank:
> The large problem is, that on Linux the version of the kernel only
> defines the kernel interface.
I hope you'll understand that I'm not interested in discussing the
perceived shortcomings of Linux kernel and libc packaging/versioning on
the Postfix mailing list.
My point is t
On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 05:28:15PM +0100, Ralph Seichter wrote:
> * John Stoffel:
> > And we're going to run into this exact same problem the next time
> > Linus bumps the major version
> Looking at the Linux Kernel development history, you see that major
> versions have been released years apart.
* John Stoffel:
> And we're going to run into this exact same problem the next time
> Linus bumps the major version
Looking at the Linux Kernel development history, you see that major
versions have been released years apart. Version 5 has only just
arrived.
> Maybe it's make more sense to assume
> "PGNet" == PGNet Dev writes:
PGNet> On 3/10/19 3:19 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>> * LINUX5 is supported, based on sanity checks with a Rawhide
>> prerelease.
PGNet> fyi, still
PGNet> cd postfix-3.4.2
PGNet> make tidy
PGNet> make -f Makefile.in MAKELEVEL= Makefiles
PGNet>
RPM 4 CentOS7 are build =>
http://repo.mailserver.guru/7/testing/x86_64/repoview/index.html
On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 9:41 AM Scott Kitterman
wrote:
> My preference would be to press on with 3.4 (I don't mind packaging the
bug
> fixes if you don't mind releasing them), but if you are going to withdraw
3.4,
> please do it before next Sunday so I can keep it out of the next Debian
> release.
Thanks a lot Viktor,
That's heavy, but safe !
--
Samuel Torton
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org On
Behalf Of Viktor Dukhovni
Sent: 08 March 2019 16:20
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: consolidate virtual and relay_recipients files
On Wed, Mar 06, 2019
18 matches
Mail list logo
