Andrey Repin:
[ Charset windows-1250 converted... ]
> Greetings, Wietse Venema!
>
> > I do not care much what other projects do.
>
> Did I say you do? I just outlined two most common approaches, with examples.
Well, I don't like bringing up PHP in a discussion about Postfix :-(
> > Postfix has
Greetings, Wietse Venema!
> I do not care much what other projects do.
Did I say you do? I just outlined two most common approaches, with examples.
> Postfix has a good record for quality, stability and compatibility, and it
> supports four stable releases, each release receiving updates for fou
On January 31, 2019 11:10:50 AM UTC, Matus UHLAR - fantomas
wrote:
while debian and ubuntu LTS have 2-year cycle and 5-year LTS support, yes,
that can get near 8 years behind.
On 31.01.19 11:22, Jim Popovitch wrote:
Debian has no strict release cycles, and Debian's LTS is based on several
fa
On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 21:14:07 -0500, Richard Damon stated:
FreeBSD users already have a choice of either the latest postfix
version, Postfix 3.3 stable release or the latest beta
version,Postfix 3.4 experimental release. I don't know if
there is a good reason to modify the release dates, at least
On January 31, 2019 11:10:50 AM UTC, Matus UHLAR - fantomas
wrote:
>while debian and ubuntu LTS have 2-year cycle and 5-year LTS support, yes,
>that can get near 8 years behind.
Debian has no strict release cycles, and Debian's LTS is based on several
factors including $$, time, and personnel.
On 30.01.19 16:38, Wietse Venema wrote:
One problem with LTS releases is that down-stream distros can end
up running very old code (for example with 4-year LTS up-stream,
a down-stream distro with 4-year LTS can end up running 8-year old
code, which is really a pain to support on a mailing list l
