> On Dec 27, 2018, at 12:31 AM, Bill Cole
> wrote:
>
> main.cf:
> smtpd_restriction_classes = whitelist1, whitelist2, unwhitelisted
> whitelist1 = reject_[type2]
> whitelist2 = reject_[type1]
> unwhitelisted = reject_[type1], reject_[type2]
>
> smtpd_*_restrictions =
> check_clie
On 26 Dec 2018, at 22:35, Michael Fox wrote:
What I'd like to do is have a whitelist apply to only a specific
reject.
You could use an access table to look up per-recipient rules.
See http://www.postfix.org/RESTRICTION_CLASS_README.html for an
example.
Hmmm. I read that. I don't see how
Hi Postfix users
After a system upgrade of Debian 8 to Debian 9 I have encountered the
following problem:
Return-Path that is being added into the mail headers converts lines looks
like this:
*Return-Path: *
Because of the SRS becoming lowercase, this now triggers some spamfilters
like SpamAssas
> In addition to defining alternative restriction lists and classes as
> Wietse noted, you can keep all of your restrictions in the standard
> smtpd_*_restrictions lists if you prefer and can accept the limitation
> of having each type of whitelisting applied to a trailing sublist of
> restrictions
> >
> > What I'd like to do is have a whitelist apply to only a specific reject.
>
> You could use an access table to look up per-recipient rules.
> See http://www.postfix.org/RESTRICTION_CLASS_README.html for an
> example.
Hmmm. I read that. I don't see how it applies to this case. Can you gi
Greetings, Wietse Venema!
> Andrey Repin:
>> Greetings, All!
>>
>> > I think I just broke my mail system. I'd like a quick help if possible.
>> > I have a remote server that accepts the mail for domain right now.
>> > The mail is retrieved from it by fetchmail and pushed to the local postfix
>> >
Andrey Repin:
> Greetings, All!
>
> > I think I just broke my mail system. I'd like a quick help if possible.
> > I have a remote server that accepts the mail for domain right now.
> > The mail is retrieved from it by fetchmail and pushed to the local postfix
> > instance to be delivered to the us
Greetings, All!
I think I just broke my mail system. I'd like a quick help if possible.
I have a remote server that accepts the mail for domain right now.
The mail is retrieved from it by fetchmail and pushed to the local postfix
instance to be delivered to the user mailboxes using
mda "/usr/sbin
Greetings, All!
> I think I just broke my mail system. I'd like a quick help if possible.
> I have a remote server that accepts the mail for domain right now.
> The mail is retrieved from it by fetchmail and pushed to the local postfix
> instance to be delivered to the user mailboxes using
> mda
Volker Cordes:
> Hello,
>
> how do I reject mails that use an @-sign in the display name of the from
> header?
>
> A lot of SPAM and VIRUS mails use from addresses like "My Name
>" with lots of spaces so
> the real address is never shown by the mail client. I want to block
> these mails.
The
On Wed, December 26, 2018 8:14 pm, Volker Cordes wrote:
> how do I reject mails that use an @-sign in the display name of the from
> header?
Have you read http://www.postfix.org/BUILTIN_FILTER_README.html ?
On 12/26/18 3:14 PM, Volker Cordes wrote:
> Hello,
>
> how do I reject mails that use an @-sign in the display name of the from
> header?
>
> A lot of SPAM and VIRUS mails use from addresses like "My Name
>" with lots of spaces so the
> real address is never shown by the mail client. I want t
Hello,
how do I reject mails that use an @-sign in the display name of the from
header?
A lot of SPAM and VIRUS mails use from addresses like "My Name
" with lots of spaces so the
real address is never shown by the mail client. I want to block these mails.
Thanks,
Volker
signature.asc
Desc
Michael Orlitzky:
> POSTSCREEN_README.html says that the error
>
> NOQUEUE: reject: CONNECT from [address]:port: all server ports busy
>
> is affected by the postscreen_pre_queue_limit parameter. However, in
> postscreen.c it looks like the error associated with the "pre_queue"
> parameter is "
14 matches
Mail list logo
