Chad M Stewart:
> I want to setup a method by which only senders which are in a defined
> list can send a message to a given recipient.
>
> Something like the following (in pseudo code)
>
> accept if sender and recipient
http://www.postfwd.org/
I decided 10+ years ago to leave complex polic
> "Chad" == Chad M Stewart writes:
Chad> I want to setup a method by which only senders which are in a defined
Chad> list can send a message to a given recipient.
External or internal recipient? And wouldn't the simplest method just
be a procmail or sieve filter on the receivers end?
C
I want to setup a method by which only senders which are in a defined
list can send a message to a given recipient.
Something like the following (in pseudo code)
accept if sender and recipient
The idea being that each recipient will have their own whitelist, and
only messages from those ad
> On Oct 29, 2018, at 10:59 AM, kousou+post...@aueb.gr wrote:
>
> Yet, with all respect, I do believe that you should reconsider the issue so
> that no such 'tricks' would be necessary and hence the deployment and
> administration of the system would be more straightforward.
Unfortunately, the tr
I do appreciate your prompt response.
Your first suggestion (to add an "owner-alias1: address" entry to the local
aliases file) creates a new problem ...
The queue entry has owner-ali...@example.dm as sender address, instead of
the real sender address of the initial message.
-Queue ID- --Size--
kousou+post...@aueb.gr:
> Hello all,
> For the past week I have been puzzled with the following case .
> In local aliases I have defined an alias
> alias1: user1, user2, user3
> User2 is overquota and messages destined to user2 are deferred.
> When a message is sent to alias1 it is delivered to use
Hello all,
For the past week I have been puzzled with the following case .
In local aliases I have defined an alias
alias1: user1, user2, user3
User2 is overquota and messages destined to user2 are deferred.
When a message is sent to alias1 it is delivered to user1 and user3,
deferred for user2 and
Phil Stracchino skrev den 2018-10-29 00:14:
Never mind, never mind - I just found the right search term to identify
the problem. It's running into the hardcoded *DEFAULT* of 50MB for
mailbox_size_limit.
Of course, once I know *that*, the problem is easily solved.
is it mbox local lda setup ?
