Am 25.09.18 um 17:34 schrieb Viktor Dukhovni:
>
>
>> On Sep 25, 2018, at 9:29 AM, Paul Menzel wrote:
>>
>> We want to improve that. Unfortunately, DANE is not an option as the DFN
>> does not support that,
>
> What do you mean by "DFN does not support that"? If by "DFN" you mean
> "DFN-Verein"
Dear Viktor,
Am 25.09.2018 um 17:42 schrieb Viktor Dukhovni:
On Sep 25, 2018, at 11:34 AM, Viktor Dukhovni
wrote:
The DANE survey finds 21 domains with DFN-Verein certificates and working
DANE. There are almost certainly some that don't have DANE TLSA records,
but they could if they wanted
> On Sep 25, 2018, at 12:27 PM, Stefan Bauer wrote:
>
> I notice that only outlook out of all my mail clients, use the null mailer
> address. it looks to me after reading the standard - that outlook does it
> right. Is that correct?
Outlook is perhaps the only one that is actually sending M
I notice that only outlook out of all my mail clients, use the null mailer
address. it looks to me after reading the standard - that outlook does it
right. Is that correct?
Am Di., 25. Sep. 2018 um 17:22 Uhr schrieb Viktor Dukhovni <
postfix-us...@dukhovni.org>:
>
>
> > On Sep 25, 2018, at 10:13
> On Sep 25, 2018, at 11:58 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
>> As for "soft failure" with "verify"
>> (or "secure"), that's not presently supported in Postfix.
>
> What about using smtp_delivery_status_filter?
By "soft failure", I meant the OP's request to deliver anyway and
just log a warning.
Viktor Dukhovni:
> The DANE survey finds 21 domains with DFN-Verein certificates and working
> DANE. There are almost certainly some that don't have DANE TLSA records,
> but they could if they wanted to. As for "soft failure" with "verify"
> (or "secure"), that's not presently supported in Postfi
> On Sep 25, 2018, at 11:34 AM, Viktor Dukhovni
> wrote:
>
> The DANE survey finds 21 domains with DFN-Verein certificates and working
> DANE. There are almost certainly some that don't have DANE TLSA records,
> but they could if they wanted to.
FWIW, the certificates found among DANE-enabl
> On Sep 25, 2018, at 9:29 AM, Paul Menzel wrote:
>
> We want to improve that. Unfortunately, DANE is not an option as the DFN
> does not support that,
What do you mean by "DFN does not support that"? If by "DFN" you mean
"DFN-Verein", their certificates pose no compatibility issues with DAN
> On Sep 25, 2018, at 10:13 AM, Stefan Bauer wrote:
>
> I was more asking if it's even a good idea to add the null entry to the
> table? i would like to be a good postmaster but not want to relax policies
> for allowed sender addresses.
You need to allow mail with null return addresses. Th
Hey,
I just signed the petition "Devendra Fadnavis: Clean drinking municipal
water for North West Virar residents" and wanted to see if you could help
by adding your name.
Our goal is to reach 224 signatures and we need more support. You can read
more and sign the petition here:
https://chn.ge/2
I was more asking if it's even a good idea to add the null entry to the
table? i would like to be a good postmaster but not want to relax policies
for allowed sender addresses.
Am Di., 25. Sep. 2018 um 13:26 Uhr schrieb Wietse Venema <
wie...@porcupine.org>:
>
> Stefan Bauer:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm u
Dear Postfix folks,
Currently, our `/etc/postfix/tls_policy` looks like below to force
encryption when sending messages to other servers in our organization.
mpg.deencrypt
.mpg.de encrypt
We want to improve that. Unfortunately, DA
Stefan Bauer:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using smtpd_sender_restrictions = check_sender_access
> hash:/etc/postfix/allowed_sender
>
> to make sure, my senders only send out with pre-defined and allowed domains.
>
> Now i noticed, that if my users acknowledge "read confirmations" in
> clients, mails in the fo
Hi,
I'm using smtpd_sender_restrictions = check_sender_access
hash:/etc/postfix/allowed_sender
to make sure, my senders only send out with pre-defined and allowed domains.
Now i noticed, that if my users acknowledge "read confirmations" in
clients, mails in the following form arrive at postfix:
14 matches
Mail list logo
