> >
> > Thank you. I have this there.
> > /^X-SPAM-FLAG:\s+YES/ REDIRECT s...@mycompany.com
> >
> > How can I keep this without wiping out the original header?
>
> This does not drop Recived: headers. You are dropping those headers
> in some other way.
>
> Wietse
I edited some files, re
dur...@mgtsciences.com:
> > From: Wietse Venema
> > To: Postfix users
> > Date: 07/24/2018 11:53 AM
> > Subject: Re: Missing 'Received' in header
> > Sent by: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
> >
> > dur...@mgtsciences.com:
> > > I receive email through Postfix, then relay it on to my Domino serv
On 24 Jul 2018, at 11:31, dur...@mgtsciences.com wrote:
I had it white-listed here.
postscreen_access_list = permit_mynetworks,
cidr:/etc/postfix/postscreen_access.cidr
So why was it not passed?
Because postscreen and smtpd are distinct programs that have independent
(but compatibly conf
On 07/24/18 14:00, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> OK, it took me a couple of readings to parse what exactly you were doing
> with the variable there, but once I cleared that up, it seems to be
> working correctly for normal direct delivery. Now waiting for my
> outside co-conspirator to do another forc
> From: dur...@mgtsciences.com
> To: Postfix users
> Cc: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
> Date: 07/24/2018 12:22 PM
> Subject: Re: Missing 'Received' in header
> Sent by: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
>
> > From: Wietse Venema
> > To: Postfix users
> > Date: 07/24/2018 11:53 AM
> > Subjec
> From: Wietse Venema
> To: Postfix users
> Date: 07/24/2018 11:53 AM
> Subject: Re: Missing 'Received' in header
> Sent by: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
>
> dur...@mgtsciences.com:
> > I receive email through Postfix, then relay it on to my Domino server.
In
> > my old Sendmail
> > setup
On 07/24/18 10:36, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 09:59:18AM -0400, Phil Stracchino wrote:
>
>> I'm just not
>> sure of the best way to set things up such that it does NOT get filtered.
>
> Add the backup MX to an IP-based whitelist. Check that whitelist
> before all restrictio
dur...@mgtsciences.com:
> I receive email through Postfix, then relay it on to my Domino server. In
> my old Sendmail
> setup the Received were in the header, now they are missing. Is there
> something I
> am doing which is striping them off?
>
> === main.cf ===
...
> header_checks = regexp:
Hi All
I have my postfix server up and running now for some time. Recently though,
auditors made a deal that the server is an open relay. It is true that on
the local lan it is. What's the best way to change this behavior? For
example, is there a way to configure postfix to accept mail from say tw
I receive email through Postfix, then relay it on to my Domino server. In
my old Sendmail
setup the Received were in the header, now they are missing. Is there
something I
am doing which is striping them off?
=== main.cf ===
alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases
alias_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/a
owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org wrote on 07/24/2018 09:35:39 AM:
> From: Viktor Dukhovni
> To: Postfix users
> Date: 07/24/2018 09:36 AM
> Subject: Re: How to white list
> Sent by: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
>
>
>
> > On Jul 23, 2018, at 7:04 PM, Allen Coates
> wrote:
> >
> > anything
> On Jul 23, 2018, at 7:04 PM, Allen Coates wrote:
>
> anything white-listed by postscreen will bypass client restrictions also
That's not correct.
--
Viktor.
owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org wrote on 07/23/2018 05:04:45 PM:
> From: Allen Coates
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Date: 07/23/2018 05:05 PM
> Subject: Re: How to white list
> Sent by: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
>
>
>
> On 23/07/18 21:17, dur...@mgtsciences.com wrote:
> > I have whit
On Tue, July 24, 2018 10:27, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> On 07/24/18 09:59, Phil Stracchino wrote:
>> On 07/24/18 08:42, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Jul 24, 2018, at 8:36 AM, Phil Stracchino
wrote:
EXCEPT when mail is being queued through my secondary MX
because I'm
On Wednesday 18 July 2018 03:27:36 pm Noel Jones wrote:
> On 7/18/2018 12:59 PM, Diego Vadell wrote:
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > I have a postfix server (with amavis and clamav) that receives emails
> > for other domains. When it gets a mail for a non-existent email, it
> > accepts it anyway
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 09:59:18AM -0400, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> I'm just not
> sure of the best way to set things up such that it does NOT get filtered.
Add the backup MX to an IP-based whitelist. Check that whitelist
before all restrictions other than relay control.
cidr = cidr:${co
On 07/24/18 09:59, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> On 07/24/18 08:42, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>>> On Jul 24, 2018, at 8:36 AM, Phil Stracchino wrote:
>>>
>>> EXCEPT when mail is being queued through my secondary MX because I'm
>>> offline. Then it's a problem, which I'm now trying to figure out how t
On 07/24/18 08:42, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>> On Jul 24, 2018, at 8:36 AM, Phil Stracchino wrote:
>>
>> EXCEPT when mail is being queued through my secondary MX because I'm
>> offline. Then it's a problem, which I'm now trying to figure out how to
>> fix.
>
> You MUST NOT filter inbound traff
hi.
2018-07-24 18:24 GMT+09:00 Dominic Raferd :
>> Does 'the non-standard "wrapper" mode' refer to SMTPS using port 465?
>> smtpd_tls_wrappermode
>> http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtpd_tls_wrappermode
>> > Run the Postfix SMTP server in the non-standard "wrapper" mode, instead
>> > of usi
> On Jul 24, 2018, at 8:36 AM, Phil Stracchino wrote:
>
> EXCEPT when mail is being queued through my secondary MX because I'm
> offline. Then it's a problem, which I'm now trying to figure out how to
> fix.
You MUST NOT filter inbound traffic via your secondary MX.
If that MX host is to
On 07/24/18 06:23, Dominic Raferd wrote:
> Off-topic but I am curious about your blocking policy based purely on
> SPF. I see a fair few SPF fails on incoming mails from genuine senders.
I see very few EXCEPT when it's coming through my secondary MX. As a
general rule, if a domain *has* an SPF
On Mon, 23 Jul 2018 at 15:04, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> On 07/21/18 21:25, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > Only check SPF at the external border of your email architecture. The
> relay
> > from your backup MX is an internal relay. SPF checks from that host
> should be
> > skipped. If you look at the
On Tue, 24 Jul 2018 at 09:06, Miwa Susumu wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> Does 'the non-standard "wrapper" mode' refer to SMTPS using port 465?
> smtpd_tls_wrappermode
> http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtpd_tls_wrappermode
> > Run the Postfix SMTP server in the non-standard "wrapper" mode, instead
Hi all.
Does 'the non-standard "wrapper" mode' refer to SMTPS using port 465?
smtpd_tls_wrappermode
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtpd_tls_wrappermode
> Run the Postfix SMTP server in the non-standard "wrapper" mode, instead of
> using the STARTTLS command.
I think SMTPS using port 4
24 matches
Mail list logo
