Re: gmail blocking 6to4 ipv6 addresses

To create and operate PTR Records for a 6to4 network, https://6to4.nro.net/ may be helpful. suomi On 06/09/2018 06:27 AM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: On Jun 8, 2018, at 11:39 PM, Shawn Landden wrote: Does gmail universally block 6to4 addresses, or is there something else I am doing wrong? Jun

Re: gmail blocking 6to4 ipv6 addresses

> On Jun 8, 2018, at 11:39 PM, Shawn Landden wrote: > > Does gmail universally block 6to4 addresses, or is there something else I am > doing wrong? > > Jun 07 23:32:14 www.git.icu postfix/smtp[19358]: 0695A2409C: > to=, orig_to=, > relay=gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com[2607:f8b0:400d:c08::1b]:25

gmail blocking 6to4 ipv6 addresses

Does gmail universally block 6to4 addresses, or is there something else I am doing wrong? Jun 07 23:32:14 www.git.icu postfix/smtp[19358]: 0695A2409C: to=< sland...@gmail.com>, orig_to=, relay= gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com[2607:f8b0:400d:c08::1b]:25, delay=1.6, delays=0.12/0.07/0.84/0.56, dsn=5.7.1,

Re: sender_bcc_maps which use reply_to header ?

On 6/8/2018 2:18 PM, Sylvain wrote: > Hi ! > > I have a case I want to solve : a mail is sent from u...@example.com > with reply_to defined to l...@example.com > . > I want to automaticaly BCC to l...@example.com > if rep

sender_bcc_maps which use reply_to header ?

Hi ! I have a case I want to solve : a mail is sent from u...@example.com with reply_to defined to l...@example.com. I want to automaticaly BCC to l...@example.com if reply_to is defined to l...@example.com. sender_bcc_maps use "from" header, I want same with reply_to header. It seems this doesn'

Re: Valid examples for mynetworks file

Olaf313: > Sorry for the missing details: > > I have added this to the default line in main.cf: > > mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8 [:::127.0.0.0]/104 [::1]/128 > hash:/etc/postfix/SMTP_allow.txt > > then run the command > > postmap SMTP_allow.txt (created the db file) > postfix r

Re: local mail submission sendmail fails when loopback is down

> On Jun 8, 2018, at 6:47 AM, Daniel Armengod wrote: > > TL;DR: `sendmail ` fails with `sendmail: fatal: could not find > any active network interfaces` if loopback interface is not up. Is this > expected behaviour? Yes, expected. The failure is in common initialization code that is not send

local mail submission sendmail fails when loopback is down

Hello all, TL;DR: `sendmail ` fails with `sendmail: fatal: could not find any active network interfaces` if loopback interface is not up. Is this expected behaviour? Longer: I know applications can expect the loopback interface to be available. However, strictly speaking, sendmail when invoked f