Re: clamav as a milter

On 27/03/18 03:18, Alex Bruce wrote: > Thing is clamav-milter is a before-queue filter (used as milter in > postfix) whereas ClamSMTP is after-queue filter (uses content filter in > postfix) > > These are fundamentally different ways of providing filtering in Postfix. > > Before-Queue filtering c

Re: clamav as a milter

Am 26.03.2018 um 23:27 schrieb André Rodier: > Hello all, > > Does anyone suffered performance loss when using clamav as a milter for > postfix? Not relevant, but for sure to scan something you need resources and time. > > I would like to scan archives and emails with attachments. Is there any

Re: clamav as a milter

Thing is clamav-milter is a before-queue filter (used as milter in postfix) whereas ClamSMTP is after-queue filter (uses content filter in postfix) These are fundamentally different ways of providing filtering in Postfix. Before-Queue filtering can reject emails if they have a virus in the SMTP

Re: clamav as a milter

On March 26, 2018 11:12:37 PM UTC, "li...@lazygranch.com" wrote: >On Mon, 26 Mar 2018 18:35:19 -0400 >Scott Kitterman wrote: > >> On Monday, March 26, 2018 10:27:57 PM André Rodier wrote: >> > Hello all, >> > >> > Does anyone suffered performance loss when using clamav as a milter >> > for po

Re: clamav as a milter

On Mon, 26 Mar 2018 18:35:19 -0400 Scott Kitterman wrote: > On Monday, March 26, 2018 10:27:57 PM André Rodier wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > Does anyone suffered performance loss when using clamav as a milter > > for postfix? > > > > I would like to scan archives and emails with attachments. Is

Re: clamav as a milter

On 26/03/18 23:35, Scott Kitterman wrote: > On Monday, March 26, 2018 10:27:57 PM André Rodier wrote: >> Hello all, >> >> Does anyone suffered performance loss when using clamav as a milter for >> postfix? >> >> I would like to scan archives and emails with attachments. Is there any >> other way to

Re: clamav as a milter

On Monday, March 26, 2018 10:27:57 PM André Rodier wrote: > Hello all, > > Does anyone suffered performance loss when using clamav as a milter for > postfix? > > I would like to scan archives and emails with attachments. Is there any > other way to do than using a milter? > > Thanks for your adv

clamav as a milter

Hello all, Does anyone suffered performance loss when using clamav as a milter for postfix? I would like to scan archives and emails with attachments. Is there any other way to do than using a milter? Thanks for your advices. André

Re: Yahoo blocking emails from Postfix

ahsan2011: > Thanks > > Yeah, i know it does not depend on the MTA. I use multiple IPs with SPF, > DKIM and DMARC. > > Regularly update the lists, > > used transport to limit yahoo sending but no success. The problem i see that > even though set a delay to send to yahoo, the emails which are the

Re: Yahoo blocking emails from Postfix

Thanks Yeah, i know it does not depend on the MTA. I use multiple IPs with SPF, DKIM and DMARC. Regularly update the lists, used transport to limit yahoo sending but no success. The problem i see that even though set a delay to send to yahoo, the emails which are there in deferred queue tend to

Re: Which user lookup wins?

Matus UHLAR - fantomas: > >Matus UHLAR - fantomas: > >> virtual_alias_domains and virtual_alias_maps are described in > >> "The virtual alias domain class." section. > >> > >> * Domain names are listed in virtual_alias_domains. The default value is > >> $virtual_alias_maps for Postfix 1.1 compatibi

Re: Is it possible to have Postfix mark debug_peer_list messages as "debug" syslog severity?

deoren: > It would be nice though if there was an option to enable a specific > syslog severity level or messages generated as a result of using the > debug_peer_* options. > > Do you accept feature requests here on the list or through another means? There is no shortage of 'nice-to-have' thing

Re: Which user lookup wins?

On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 05:21:22PM +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > > > >> On 14.03.18 20:14, Wietse Venema wrote: > > > >> >The Postfix SMTP server always looks in virtual_alias_maps. > > > > > > >Matus UHLAR - fantomas: > > > >> Always? isn't that a contradiction to the referenced > > > >

Re: Which user lookup wins?

>> >@lbutlr >> >> When postfix checks for a local user it looks at any local user (like = >> >> /home/fred), I assume by checking /etc/passwd or similar (I have local = >> >> users who can receive mail who are not mentioned in any /etc/postfix/* = >> >> file, so postfix knows about them from somew

Re: Is it possible to have Postfix mark debug_peer_list messages as "debug" syslog severity?

On 3/26/2018 6:02 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: Viktor Dukhovni: On Mar 25, 2018, at 11:59 PM, deoren wrote: Is there an option somewhere to change that, so that all messages logged as as a result of the debug_peer_* options are set at debug syslog level instead? No. Do not turn on debug_pe

Re: Is it possible to have Postfix mark debug_peer_list messages as "debug" syslog severity?

Viktor Dukhovni: > > > > On Mar 25, 2018, at 11:59 PM, deoren wrote: > > > > Is there an option somewhere to change that, so that all messages logged as > > as a result of the debug_peer_* options are set at debug syslog level > > instead? > > No. Do not turn on debug_peer_* logging for rou

Re: Is it possible to have Postfix mark debug_peer_list messages as "debug" syslog severity?

On 3/26/2018 12:18 AM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: On Mar 25, 2018, at 11:59 PM, deoren wrote: Is there an option somewhere to change that, so that all messages logged as as a result of the debug_peer_* options are set at debug syslog level instead? No. Thank you for the definitive answer.