Re: Backup mx relay got rejected due to SPF

2017-11-17 Thread Benny Pedersen
Gao skrev den 2017-11-17 23:56: Is there anything I can configure it to whitelist my backup mx IP? http://search.cpan.org/dist/Net-CIDR/CIDR.pm

Re: Backup mx relay got rejected due to SPF

2017-11-17 Thread Gao
In the perl script /usr/local/sbin/postfix-policyd-spf-perl, (got from https://launchpad.net/postfix-policyd-spf-perl/) I see these code: # -- #    handler: relay exemption # --

Re: Backup mx relay got rejected due to SPF

2017-11-17 Thread Scott Kitterman
The man page explains how to do it, but it's not the most user friendly package. The Python implementation is much more mature and easier to configure. It can be found in your distribution/OS packaging system, on pypi, or at https://launchpad.net/pypolicyd-spf . Scott K On November 17, 2017

Re: Backup mx relay got rejected due to SPF

2017-11-17 Thread Noel Jones
On 11/17/2017 3:47 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote: > Gao skrev den 2017-11-17 22:26: > >> I couldn't figure out how to whitelist the backup mx on the >> destitution server. > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=468388 > > i dont know if thats resolved or not > > following this link he

Re: Backup mx relay got rejected due to SPF

2017-11-17 Thread Noel Jones
On 11/17/2017 2:34 PM, Gao wrote: > Hi, > > I just built a postfix mail server(mail.mytestmx.com) with > PostfixAdmin, SPF and DKIM.,etc. It works very well. Now I try to > use the new built server as the backup mail server of another server > (zeta.othermx.com), so I add a backup domain in Postfi

Re: Backup mx relay got rejected due to SPF

2017-11-17 Thread Benny Pedersen
Gao skrev den 2017-11-17 22:26: I couldn't figure out how to whitelist the backup mx on the destitution server. https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=468388 i dont know if thats resolved or not following this link here https://answers.launchpad.net/postfix-policyd-spf-perl/+ques

Re: Backup mx relay got rejected due to SPF

2017-11-17 Thread Gao
Thank you all for the help. Well, then how do I whitelist in SPF? I am using openspf (postfix-policyd-spf-perl) on both server. At the end of my master.cf, I have: policy unix  -   n   n   - -   spawn     user=nobody argv=/usr/bin/perl /usr/local/sbin/postfix-policyd-s

Re: Backup mx relay got rejected due to SPF

2017-11-17 Thread Benny Pedersen
Gao skrev den 2017-11-17 21:34: So what is the solution here? Should I add the mail.mytestmx.com to zeta.othermx.com's SPF record and make it trust it? If so are there any risk? yes recipient validation on backup mx mta, eq dont accept mails that cant be delivered the error is that mx dont

RE: Backup mx relay got rejected due to SPF

2017-11-17 Thread Fazzina, Angelo
Hi, to me it looks like email from= to= Came in and was cleaned Nov 17 11:13:00 mail MailScanner[9148]: Content Checks: Detected and have disarmed web bug, phishing tags in HTML message in 9202040121F2.A6CDC from communicati

Re: Backup mx relay got rejected due to SPF

2017-11-17 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Friday, November 17, 2017 12:34:06 PM Gao wrote: > Hi, > > I just built a postfix mail server(mail.mytestmx.com) with PostfixAdmin, > SPF and DKIM.,etc. It works very well. Now I try to use the new built > server as the backup mail server of another server (zeta.othermx.com), > so I add a backu

Backup mx relay got rejected due to SPF

2017-11-17 Thread Gao
Hi, I just built a postfix mail server(mail.mytestmx.com) with PostfixAdmin, SPF and DKIM.,etc. It works very well. Now I try to use the new built server as the backup mail server of another server (zeta.othermx.com), so I add a backup domain in PostfixAdmin and setup DNS accordingly. Later t

RE: Mail Routing Question

2017-11-17 Thread Kevin Miller
Good catch. I was trying to be succinct, but didn't realize that one couldn't use an IP rather than the hostname. So the corrected example should be something like this then: mailIN A 192.168.0.2 aaa IN A 192.168.1.1 IN MX 10 mail.aaa.com. ...Kevin -- Kevin Miller Network/e

Re: Postfix now in Slackware-current

2017-11-17 Thread Phil Stracchino
On 11/17/17 09:44, /dev/rob0 wrote: > Slackware Linux has switched to the Postfix MTA as its default MTA as > of an update to the development version today. *THE STARS ARE RIGHT* Ïa! Ïa! In darkness He comes! He comes! -- Phil Stracchino Babylon Communications ph...@caerllewys.net

Postfix now in Slackware-current

2017-11-17 Thread /dev/rob0
Slackware Linux has switched to the Postfix MTA as its default MTA as of an update to the development version today. https://mirrors.slackware.com/slackware/slackware64-current/ChangeLog.txt "Default MTA" in Slackware terms means "the only MTA". Sendmail 8.15.2 has been moved out of the main d

Re: postmap db

2017-11-17 Thread Wietse Venema
richard lucassen: > Hello list, > > When e.g. I have an access file with: > > domain.tld reject > baduser@ reject > > Postfix will reject "u...@domain.tld" and "baduser@anydomain.anytld". > > When I want to test these db's using "postmap -q", postmap only tests > the "real" entries in the

Re: postmap db

2017-11-17 Thread richard lucassen
On Thu, 16 Nov 2017 20:49:23 -0600 /dev/rob0 wrote: > You did not mention how your access file was being used. Apparently > it's being used for email address lookups, so perhaps > check_sender_access or check_recipient_access. Any supercharged > postmap tool would have to know this also. Th