On 11 September 2017 at 19:25, Viktor Dukhovni
wrote:
>
> > On Sep 11, 2017, at 5:21 AM, Dominic Raferd
> wrote:
> >
> > Does anyone know a way to detect if the certificate currently being used
> by Postfix and/or Dovecot is nearing expiry (esp. in case they haven't
> picked up the updated letse
you're right, I'm learning to write a systemd style script, but not familiar
with postmulti
--
Sent from: http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/Postfix-Users-f2.html
>I know was postmulti arguments problem, but I want to know is: is this
>postfix version difference or ubuntu make some change, or
>/etc/init.d/postfix has some special?
The Debian / Ubuntu start script probably expects some distribution specific
configuration to be in place.
Your best bet is
I know, but I remove quiet-quick-start in /etc/init.d/postfix, still failed,
but now log was:
Sep 13 10:47:54 xiedeacc postmulti[7989]: fatal: Specify exactly one of
'-e', '-l', '-p', '-x'
Sep 13 10:48:33 xiedeacc postfix/postfix-script[8095]: error: unknown
command: ''
Sep 13 10:48:33 xiedeacc po
On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 07:32:03PM -0700, xiedeacc wrote:
> hi all, use systemd start postfix faild, here is detail:
>
> postfix/postfix-script[6735] error: unknown command: 'quiet-quick-start'
> postfix/postfix-script[6736] fatal: usage: postfix start (or stop, reload,
> abort, flush, check, sta
hi all, use systemd start postfix faild, here is detail:
my os is ubuntu-gnome 16.04.03, first I use apt install postfix and other
software, for some reason, I reinstalled it by complied source code, version
was postfix-3.2.2, installed successfully, but when use systemctl start
postfix, it failed
here is mail log, for the post title, I decide ask a new question
postfix/postfix-script[6735] error: unknown command: 'quiet-quick-start'
postfix/postfix-script[6736] fatal: usage: postfix start (or stop, reload,
abort, flush, check, status, set-permissions, upgrade-configuration)
--
Sent fro
On 09/12/17 14:19, Marat Khalili wrote:
> If your firewall is capable of running fail2ban, I'd consider sending
> postscreen logs to it instead.
Hmm. That's an option I hadn't considered.
The firewall is an embedded device (Ubiquiti EdgeRouter POE/5), so I
don't have a gigantic amount of RAM or
On 12/09/17 18:19, Phil Stracchino wrote:
Has anyone set up fail2ban to trigger from postscreen rejections and apply
blocks to a firewall on a separate host? And if so, any tips to share?
Solved simpler task: separate host (container actually) but still iptables.
Cloned iptables-multiport.conf
On 09/12/17 12:32, Noel Jones wrote:
> Tip #1: Ignore these. The log entries are annoying, but other than
> logs this causes pretty close to zero impact on your system.
> Tip #4: Just ignore the log entries. The same IP probably goes away
> fairly soon, so blocking the IP probably doesn't do muc
On 9/12/2017 10:19 AM, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> This is semi-hypothetical ...
>
> I often see spews of failed connect attempts logged by postscreen:
>
> Sep 12 11:13:09 minbar postfix/postscreen[9238]: CONNECT from
> [70.39.115.203]:54708 to [10.24.32.15]:25
> Sep 12 11:13:09 minbar postfix/posts
> On Sep 12, 2017, at 10:35 AM, Luciano Mannucci
> wrote:
>
> I have a running postfix 2.11.10 that binds to several interfaces, on
> some of which I whish to enable TLS. I have a different certificate
> for each interface; is that supported or I have to run two different
> postfixes?
http://w
my os is ubuntu 16.04, when make install I have choose /usr/lib/postfix/sbin
--
Sent from: http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/Postfix-Users-f2.html
first I install postfix use apt install postfix, everything goes right, can
use systemctl start postfix, but I want change some code, so I reinstall
postfix by compiling postfix, then use systemctl start postfix, it
complaint: I have googled, but failed to solve it. does anybody know it ?
systemct
This is semi-hypothetical ...
I often see spews of failed connect attempts logged by postscreen:
Sep 12 11:13:09 minbar postfix/postscreen[9238]: CONNECT from
[70.39.115.203]:54708 to [10.24.32.15]:25
Sep 12 11:13:09 minbar postfix/postscreen[9238]: PREGREET 14 after 0.12
from [70.39.115.203]:547
I have a running postfix 2.11.10 that binds to several interfaces, on
some of which I whish to enable TLS. I have a different certificate
for each interface; is that supported or I have to run two different
postfixes?
Thanks to everybody,
Luciano.
--
/"\ /Via A. Salaino
Hi Wietse,
Yeap, another very valid point.
I do agree that the risks of using the hostnames to exclude features are not
insignificant,
in which case I'd ask if the use of hostnames to include features (whitelisting
rather than blacklisting) would be more acceptable in terms of risk?
If the reso
17 matches
Mail list logo
