RE: chroot setting in master.cf

2017-08-10 Thread Michael Fox
> The default master.cf as distributed by postfix has all services as > chroot "n", and that is the recommended setting. > -- Noel Jones Thanks Noel. Interesting. From http://www.postfix.org/BASIC_CONFIGURATION_README.html#chroot_setup, the recommendation seems to be to use chroot wherever pos

Re: migrating 2.1 to 3.x ?

2017-08-10 Thread Voytek
On Thu, August 10, 2017 6:33 pm, Peter wrote: > On 10/08/17 16:51, Voytek wrote: >> mail_version = 2.11.0 > > This is not the stock postfix for CentOS 6, so if you want to upgrade it > on the same server you might want to check where the current postfix came > from. How it got there has to do wit

Re: reloading postfix with systemd

2017-08-10 Thread Mark Constable
On 11/08/17 05:20, Michael Fox wrote: # cat /usr/lib/systemd/system/postfix.service Hmm. My Ubuntu system has no such file. On *buntu/deb machines it's... /lib/systemd/system/postfix.service dpkg -L postfix | grep service

Re: chroot setting in master.cf

2017-08-10 Thread Noel Jones
On 8/10/2017 2:46 PM, Michael Fox wrote: > I'm configuring master.cf to add amavisd-new. The amavisd-new documentation > (/usr/share/doc/amavisd-new/README.postfix.html) differs from the default > master.cf file regarding the chroot setting for the cleanup (and > pre-cleanup) service. I presume t

Re: retry 5xx using a fallback outgoing IP

2017-08-10 Thread Noel Jones
On 8/10/2017 12:29 PM, Mai Ling wrote: > However, the topic of this thread is: Can postfix retry a failed > message, by attempting to retransmit using a different outgoing IP > address of the machine it's running on? > > If I send a mail to the same destination using the old IP address, a > regula

chroot setting in master.cf

2017-08-10 Thread Michael Fox
I'm configuring master.cf to add amavisd-new. The amavisd-new documentation (/usr/share/doc/amavisd-new/README.postfix.html) differs from the default master.cf file regarding the chroot setting for the cleanup (and pre-cleanup) service. I presume that the amavisd-new documentation is in error and

RE: reloading postfix with systemd

2017-08-10 Thread Michael Fox
> Well at least in Redhat, if you do systemctl reload postfix it just > executes postfix reload internally. So it makes absolutely no > difference. > > # cat /usr/lib/systemd/system/postfix.service > [Unit] > Description=Postfix Mail Transport Agent > After=syslog.target network.target > Conflicts

Re: reloading postfix with systemd

2017-08-10 Thread Bastian Blank
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 05:42:44PM +, Fazzina, Angelo wrote: > I would think they both work for backwards compatibility and over time > "service postfix reload" will eventually be depreciated and no longer be a > valid command. Well. "postfix reload" != "service postfix reload". Bastian --

Re: retry 5xx using a fallback outgoing IP

2017-08-10 Thread Wietse Venema
Mai Ling: > FWIW, Mathus, the remote side is simply printing a 5xx one line > message "not accepted" banner instead of the expected welcome 220 > banner, not giving any explanation to why, then closing the tcp > session, without postfix even getting a chance to say HELO! If the primary MX for a do

RE: reloading postfix with systemd

2017-08-10 Thread Fazzina, Angelo
IMHO I would think they both work for backwards compatibility and over time "service postfix reload" will eventually be depreciated and no longer be a valid command. I expect that to take years. -ALF -Angelo Fazzina Operating Systems Programmer / Analyst University of Connecticut,  UITS, SSG,

Re: reloading postfix with systemd

2017-08-10 Thread Julian Kippels
Am Thu, 10 Aug 2017 10:19:25 -0700 schrieb "Michael Fox" : > In v16.04 LTS, Ubuntu has switched to systemd. > > "postfix reload" still seems to work just fine. > But I wonder if I should be using "systemctl reload postfix" instead. > > Which method is preferred on systems that use systemd? > And

Re: retry 5xx using a fallback outgoing IP

2017-08-10 Thread Mai Ling
I'm sorry but I fail to understand what value is your acid question bringing to the conversation. FWIW, Mathus, the remote side is simply printing a 5xx one line message "not accepted" banner instead of the expected welcome 220 banner, not giving any explanation to why, then closing t

reloading postfix with systemd

2017-08-10 Thread Michael Fox
In v16.04 LTS, Ubuntu has switched to systemd. "postfix reload" still seems to work just fine. But I wonder if I should be using "systemctl reload postfix" instead. Which method is preferred on systems that use systemd? And if either method works, are there differences or reasons to prefer one ov

Re: retry 5xx using a fallback outgoing IP

2017-08-10 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 10.08.17 08:04, Mai Ling wrote: My question is can postfix retry a failed delivery using another smtp_bind_address than the first tried and failed one? did you even read error messages you've got and searched the net for answers? On aug. 9, 2017 at 5:10 p.m., mailto:uh...@fantomas.sk)>

Re: migrating 2.1 to 3.x ?

2017-08-10 Thread Peter
On 10/08/17 16:51, Voytek wrote: > I currently have Postfix 2.11 /MySQL on Centos 6, looking at migrating to > current Postfix. > > current server: > CentOS release 6.x > mail_version = 2.11.0 This is not the stock postfix for CentOS 6, so if you want to upgrade it on the same server you might wa