Re: Different LMTP configuration for different clients

El 03/05/17 a las 16:40, Wietse Venema escribió: Angel L. Mateo: Hello, I have a postfix mail relay server for my domain. This mail server delivered mail to my imap server via LMTP. Now I want that all mail received from a client to the same imap server, but with a different LM

Re: Different LMTP configuration for different clients

El 03/05/17 a las 16:44, Viktor Dukhovni escribió: On May 3, 2017, at 7:56 AM, Angel L. Mateo wrote: I have a postfix mail relay server for my domain. This mail server delivered mail to my imap server via LMTP. Now I want that all mail received from a client to the same imap

Re: default_transport in master.cf

On 5/3/2017 3:57 PM, dave.postfix-us...@mtfbwy.cz wrote: > Hi, I'm trying to change the default_transport directive in > master.cf but it doesn't work: > > 1.2.3.4:smtp inet n - n - - smtpd > -o default_transport=smtp_redir > > smtp_redir unix - -

Re: default_transport in master.cf\

dave.postfix-us...@mtfbwy.cz: > Hi, I'm trying to change the default_transport directive in master.cf > but it doesn't work: > > 1.2.3.4:smtp inet n - n - - smtpd > -o default_transport=smtp_redir As documented, default_transport IS NOT an smtp(8) property.

Re: Trace spam activity on mail server

Regarding spamrl.com / spamexperts, their customer tools don't work. The only solution is to drop them. On and off, months were wasted with those clowns. I'm assuming the customer never sees the dictionary search attempts, so the problem is their crappy software. Now I have caught snow shoe type

Re: Trace spam activity on mail server

Now thats a name from the past. Bill, you’d probably know some of the spammer domains where they complained about spamhaus and other RBLs… Its been a while since I followed all of this stuff from Usenet days… > On May 3, 2017, at 10:25 AM, Bill Cole > wrote: > > On 2 May 2017, at 10:56, l

default_transport in master.cf

Hi, I'm trying to change the default_transport directive in master.cf but it doesn't work: 1.2.3.4:smtp inet n - n - - smtpd -o default_transport=smtp_redir smtp_redir unix - - n - - smtp -o smtp_bind_address=4.3.2.1 I have mu

LibreSSL certificate verification issue

Please see: http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2017/q2/145 ## Summary LibreSSL 2.5.1 to 2.5.3 lacks TLS certificate verification if SSL_get_verify_result is relied upon for a later check of a verification result, in a use case where a user-provided verification callback returns 1, as

Re: virtual transport lmtp vs. dovecot lda?

Hello, I've put my configuration below. All my virtual users are under one uid/gid 999, the vmail user. Should I do a db lookup or have the uid/gid defined as static? Are my restrictions good? I'm running Postfix 3.1 and the Dovecot version is 2.29. Are my message_size_limit and mailbox_size_limit

Re: virtual transport lmtp vs. dovecot lda?

On 5/2/2017 6:33 PM, David Mehler wrote: > Hi, > > I'm not sure what to send. I've temporarily solved the problem by > increasing the mysql max_connections setting from 256 to 300 and > started working. Something is using up mysql processes when the lmtp > socket is used. > > Dave. Postfix makes

Re: Trace spam activity on mail server

On 2 May 2017, at 10:56, li...@lazygranch.com wrote: Would a spammy email server only trigger one RBL? Sure. While mxtoolbox looks complete, there are more RBLs than on their list. I never knew Trend Micro had a RBL. ‎ Funny story: technically Trend Micro has the ONLY "RBL" because that's

Re: Feature Request

> On May 3, 2017, at 10:37 AM, Yukthi Systems wrote: > > We are trying to restrict the users from editing their email id when > sent through their email client, we are already using the sender login > maps but still the end users sending from email clients are able to edit > the from header, is

Re: Different LMTP configuration for different clients

> On May 3, 2017, at 7:56 AM, Angel L. Mateo wrote: > > I have a postfix mail relay server for my domain. This mail server > delivered mail to my imap server via LMTP. > > Now I want that all mail received from a client to the same imap > server, but with a different LMTP configur

Re: Different LMTP configuration for different clients

Angel L. Mateo: > Hello, > > I have a postfix mail relay server for my domain. This mail server > delivered mail to my imap server via LMTP. > > Now I want that all mail received from a client to the same imap > server, but with a different LMTP configuration. That is because this

Feature Request

​Hi, We are trying to restrict the users from editing their email id when sent through their email client, we are already using the sender login maps but still the end users sending from email clients are able to edit the from header, is there a way to overcome this. Regards Yukthi​

Re: SASL auth only on port 25

> On May 3, 2017, at 10:16 AM, @lbutlr wrote: > > -o syslog_name=submit-tls The recommended override, that is most likely to work well with log parsers is: -o syslog_name=postfix/submission or in multi-instance environments: -o syslog_name=${multi_instance_name?{$multi_insta

Re: SASL auth only on port 25

On 2017-04-27 (07:51 MDT), Simon Wilson wrote: > > Hi all, I'm tightening up my (pre-postscreen postfix 2.3.3 on CentOS 5) mail > server as I get quite a few hits on the open ports from bot nets trying to > auth. Getting ready to migrate off it - more on that later. > > Port 25 is for MTA unau

Different LMTP configuration for different clients

Hello, I have a postfix mail relay server for my domain. This mail server delivered mail to my imap server via LMTP. Now I want that all mail received from a client to the same imap server, but with a different LMTP configuration. That is because this client is a massive mailer and I want