> On Feb 16, 2017, at 5:11 PM, Josh Soref wrote:
>
> Wietse Venema wrote:
> Any Postfix 3.3 tarball, after I apply the other guy's typofixes. And
> that will happen some time after the 3.2 release is done.
>
> If someone could contact me when that happens, I'd appreciate it. I'm
> unlikely to
> On Feb 16, 2017, at 12:12 PM, li...@lazygranch.com wrote:
>
> You basically made my point. The subject line of SSL had long become
> irrelevant. The last few messages which I gather you didn't read based on
> your post were about multiple "from" fields.
This descending into ad-hominem attack
You basically made my point. The subject line of SSL had long become
irrelevant. The last few messages which I gather you didn't read based on your
post were about multiple "from" fields.
Original Message
From: /dev/rob0
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2017 8:01 AM
To: postfix-users@postfix.or
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 10:15:14PM -0800, li...@lazygranch.com wrote:
> Regarding multiple from fields, I found this on serverfault :
> http://serverfault.com/questions/554520/smtp-allows-for-multiple-from-addresses-in-the-rfc-was-this-ever-useful-why-do
>
> I could almost see this being legitima
* Wietse Venema :
> Last month it was 20 years ago that I started writing Postfix code.
> After coming to IBM research in November 1996, I spent most of
> December and January making notes on paper. I knew that writing a
> mail system was more work than any of my prior projects.
I think I used pos
