On 2/5/2017 12:04 AM, Dominic Raferd wrote:
> At the risk of going off-topic, is it worth using clamav? I run it
> (via amavis) but it last picked up something 'real' 7 weeks ago.
> (Freshclam is running and clamav does spot the EICAR test virus.)
>
It's been months since the clam official sign
On 4 February 2017 at 23:43, Mark Constable wrote:
> On 04/02/17 21:35, A. Schulze wrote:
>
>> if i will run Debian, Postfix + Dovecot on a VPS Machine what i
>>> need about memeory that this application can run without any
>>> Problem, 256Mb are not enough?
>>>
>>
>> works as long you avoid anti
On 05/02/17 07:00, richard lucassen wrote:
>> Ok, so there is no reason anymore to use all these separate
>> smtpd_*_restrictions, I will just use smtpd_recipient_restrictions
>> as clearly stated here:
>>
>> http://www.akadia.com/services/postfix_uce.html
>>
>> That's right isn't it?
>
> Apparent
On 04/02/17 21:35, A. Schulze wrote:
if i will run Debian, Postfix + Dovecot on a VPS Machine what i
need about memeory that this application can run without any
Problem, 256Mb are not enough?
works as long you avoid antivirus snakeoil and perl based spam
filtering.
Totally agree with this, t
I'm observing that these attributes, ccert_subject and ccert_issuer, when
sent in a SMTPD access policy request, only contain the common name (if
available) of the respective distinguished names (subject or issuer). Why
is it so?. Why don't you provide the full DNs as they would allow for
better de
On Sat, 4 Feb 2017 18:04:22 +0100
richard lucassen wrote:
> > http://www.postfix.org/SMTPD_ACCESS_README.html#timing
>
> Ok, so there is no reason anymore to use all these separate
> smtpd_*_restrictions, I will just use smtpd_recipient_restrictions
> as clearly stated here:
>
> http://www.akad
On Sat, 04 Feb 2017 15:29:10 +
Scott Kitterman wrote:
> >Why is "policyd-spf":
> >
> >smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
> > reject_unauth_destination
> > reject_unverified_recipient
> > check_policy_service unix:private/policyd-spf
> >
> >set under smtpd_recipient_restrictions and not under
>
On February 4, 2017 7:44:07 AM EST, richard lucassen
wrote:
>Why is "policyd-spf":
>
>smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
> reject_unauth_destination
> reject_unverified_recipient
> check_policy_service unix:private/policyd-spf
>
>set under smtpd_recipient_restrictions and not under
>smtpd_sender
D'Arcy Cain skrev den 2017-02-04 14:20:
On 2017-02-04 06:35 AM, A. Schulze wrote:
works as long you avoid antivirus snakeoil and perl based spam
filtering.
I assume that that is a dig at Spamassassin. Just curious what tools
you would suggest replacing it with. This is an honest question. I
On 2017-02-04 06:35 AM, A. Schulze wrote:
works as long you avoid antivirus snakeoil and perl based spam filtering.
I assume that that is a dig at Spamassassin. Just curious what tools
you would suggest replacing it with. This is an honest question. I do
find SA a bit of a hog and wonder i
Maurizio Caloro:
> Hello together
>
> if i will run Debian, Postfix + Dovecot on a VPS Machine what i need
> about memeory that this
> application can run without any Problem, 256Mb are not enough?
>
> - possibilities are 10 Mailboxes.
>
> exist here any experiences ?
I used to run Postf
Viktor Dukhovni:
>
> > On Feb 3, 2017, at 11:43 PM, Jaime Hablutzel Egoavil
> > wrote:
> >
> > Does this PHP script handle multiple policy lookup requests?
> > The smtpd(8) service expects a policy service to handle multiple
> > blank-line terminated requests.
> >
> > Multiple blank-line termi
Why is "policyd-spf":
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
reject_unauth_destination
reject_unverified_recipient
check_policy_service unix:private/policyd-spf
set under smtpd_recipient_restrictions and not under
smtpd_sender_restrictions? It works fine when set under
smtpd_recipient_restrictions
Am 04.02.2017 um 01:32 schrieb Maurizio Caloro:
> Hello together
>
> if i will run Debian, Postfix + Dovecot on a VPS Machine what i need about
> memeory that this
> application can run without any Problem, 256Mb are not enough?
>
> - possibilities are 10 Mailboxes.
works as long you avo
14 matches
Mail list logo
