Den 2016-12-28 kl. 21:40, skrev Noel Jones:
> On 12/28/2016 1:03 PM, Martin Skjöldebrand wrote:
>> The output indicates it will discard the rubbish. I must've remembered
>> incorrectly or something. I'll spend some time later to look at the
>> logs. Thanks all who commented.
>
> While it's very sa
On 12/28/2016 1:03 PM, Martin Skjöldebrand wrote:
> The output indicates it will discard the rubbish. I must've remembered
> incorrectly or something. I'll spend some time later to look at the
> logs. Thanks all who commented.
While it's very satisfying to DISCARD the rubbish, it's often
counterpr
Den 2016-12-28 kl. 16:56, skrev John Fawcett:
> you can test your map with:
>
> postmap -q rabattgatan.com hash:/etc/postfix/sender_access
>
> Can you show evidence, i.e. the log file entries of an email passing
> through your system from the arrival to the delivery, which shows that
> the map w
On 12/28/2016 09:36 AM, Alice Wonder wrote:
> On 12/28/2016 12:28 AM, John Fawcett wrote:
>> On 12/28/2016 08:32 AM, Alice Wonder wrote:
>>> Virtual machine for a web application, it is still in testing.
>>>
>>> reverse DNS is properly set up.
>>> Postfix only listens on the local host.
>>> Linux f
Alice Wonder:
> Static IP, Linode. Only the IPv6 was listed, the IPv4 was not, but it
> seems that postfix usually chooses IPv6 when the receiving MX resolves
> on IPv6. And that's probably the correct behavior.
smtp_address_preference (default: any)
...
Postfix SMTP client add
Yes I did, sorry I didn't mention it.
/martin s
Skickat från BlueMail
Den 28 dec. 2016 11:42, kI 11:42, Dominic Raferd
skrev:
>On 28 December 2016 at 09:06, Martin Skjöldebrand
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was under the impression that
>>
>> smtpd_sender_restrictions=check_sender_access
>> has
On 28 December 2016 at 09:06, Martin Skjöldebrand
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was under the impression that
>
> smtpd_sender_restrictions=check_sender_access
> hash:/etc/postfix/sender_access
>
> would take a list of domain and either reject or discard the message on
> reaching the server, based on the con
I'm on Digital Ocean, which is basically similar to Linode. You can just get a
new IP and maybe have better luck. That is employ the "V" in VPS. For a brief
period you will be charged for two VPS. Digital Ocean charges by the hour (like
a seedy motel). Probably Linode is similar.
The reason I
Hi,
I was under the impression that
smtpd_sender_restrictions=check_sender_access
hash:/etc/postfix/sender_access
would take a list of domain and either reject or discard the message on
reaching the server, based on the content of the file
/etc/postfix/sender_access. Maybe I am totally confused
Static IP, Linode. Only the IPv6 was listed, the IPv4 was not, but it
seems that postfix usually chooses IPv6 when the receiving MX resolves
on IPv6. And that's probably the correct behavior.
On 12/28/2016 12:18 AM, Dominic Raferd wrote:
Is your mailserver's external ip static or dynamic? I am
On 12/28/2016 12:28 AM, John Fawcett wrote:
On 12/28/2016 08:32 AM, Alice Wonder wrote:
Virtual machine for a web application, it is still in testing.
reverse DNS is properly set up.
Postfix only listens on the local host.
Linux firewall drops anything not to port 80, 443, or a custom high
numb
On 12/28/2016 08:32 AM, Alice Wonder wrote:
> Virtual machine for a web application, it is still in testing.
>
> reverse DNS is properly set up.
> Postfix only listens on the local host.
> Linux firewall drops anything not to port 80, 443, or a custom high
> number port I use for SSH.
>
> This post
Is your mailserver's external ip static or dynamic? I am afraid that
mail servers from dynamic ips always get listed as spambots even when
using SPF, DKIM, correct rDNS etc. The solutions in this case are
either to get your isp to allocate to you a static ip (not all isps
offer this however), set u
13 matches
Mail list logo
