Many thanks for the concise explanation Bill!
On 2016-10-25 13:05, Bill Cole wrote:
On 25 Oct 2016, at 15:15, mro...@insiberia.net wrote:
On 2016-10-25 07:00, Bill Cole wrote:
On 25 Oct 2016, at 2:04, mro...@insiberia.net wrote:
Hi,
Reading the postconf explanation of reject_unknown_recip
Many thanks for your explanation.
And here was I, thinking I had found a new spam-killer. :-(
Allen C
On 25/10/16 00:35, Bill Cole wrote:
> On 24 Oct 2016, at 12:29, Allen Coates wrote:
>
>>
>> Over the weekend I had three spam messages get through to my in-box. Two
>> contained an "X-PHP-Scr
On 25 Oct 2016, at 15:15, mro...@insiberia.net wrote:
On 2016-10-25 07:00, Bill Cole wrote:
On 25 Oct 2016, at 2:04, mro...@insiberia.net wrote:
Hi,
Reading the postconf explanation of reject_unknown_recipient_domain
and reject_unknown_sender_domain, I'm having trouble understanding
where
On 2016-10-25 07:00, Bill Cole wrote:
On 25 Oct 2016, at 2:04, mro...@insiberia.net wrote:
Hi,
Reading the postconf explanation of reject_unknown_recipient_domain
and reject_unknown_sender_domain, I'm having trouble understanding
where these find their use.
For incoming mail: The first tes
Hi,
I have a short question. Is it possible to integrate ezmlm-idx with Postfix
? Does ony one of You knows how to do it ?
I`m searching for some documentation for it, but everwhere is written that
ezmlm working only with qmail...
Thanks in advance for Your time and support.
Cheers
Zalezny
On 25 Oct 2016, at 2:04, mro...@insiberia.net wrote:
Hi,
Reading the postconf explanation of reject_unknown_recipient_domain
and reject_unknown_sender_domain, I'm having trouble understanding
where these find their use.
For incoming mail: The first test criteria for both is that Postfix
no
John @ KLaM:
> Do you have any suggestions/recommendations for a maintenance system.
Wietse:
> Not specifically. In the past years I have main.cf and master.cf
> configurable with "postconf" commands, to make the job easier for
> configuration tool writers. I'll leave writing such tools to the
> p
Hi,
If you are running a linux postfix server, can't you run
Postqueue -p > /tmp/queue_file
And then look at what is in your mail queue ?
-ALF
-Angelo Fazzina
Operating Systems Programmer / Analyst
University of Connecticut, UITS, SSG-Linux/ M&C
860-486-9075
-Original Message-
Fro
Am 25.10.2016 um 13:31 schrieb Wietse Venema:
> Wietse Venema:
>> I've implemented the second variant. If you maintain configurations
>> by hand, then excluding mynetworks will be a bit of extra work. I
>> recommend that configurations aren't maintained by hand.
> John @ KLaM:
>> Do you have any
Hi,
after I set /etc/openldap/ldap.conf everythinks works fine.
URI ldaps://ldap.img.local ldaps://ldap2.img.local ldaps://ldap3.img.local
NETWORK_TIMEOUT 3
TIMEOUT 3
Thanks
Michal
Dne 25. 10. 2016 v 9:46 Wietse Venema napsal(a):
MichalZ:
Hi,
I have defined three ldap servers in the virtua
Wietse Venema:
> I've implemented the second variant. If you maintain configurations
> by hand, then excluding mynetworks will be a bit of extra work. I
> recommend that configurations aren't maintained by hand.
John @ KLaM:
> Do you have any suggestions/recommendations for a maintenance system.
On 25.10.2016 10:25, Julian Kippels wrote:
> I would like to have the possibility for my users to opt out of their
> incomming mail being scanned by a spam filter. Is there a way I could
> achieve this using ldap tables? Maybe with smtpd_*_restrictions?
Intuitively, I'd say this should be taken c
Hi,
I would like to have the possibility for my users to opt out of their
incomming mail being scanned by a spam filter. Is there a way I could
achieve this using ldap tables? Maybe with smtpd_*_restrictions?
Thanks
Julian
Do you have any suggestions/recommendations for a maintenance system.
On October 25, 2016 7:23:22 PM wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) wrote:
Wietse Venema:
Wietse Venema:
> Looks like either 1) an exclusion mechanism or 2) a selection
> mechanism would do the job.
>
> 1) Nullifies the sm
Micka?l DEQUIDT:
> Now, my question would be : obviously chroot isn't necessary for cleanup
> to work, but is it not a bit dangerous to let it run outside of the cage
> ? Could you tell me what are the risks of such a configuration ?
Don't turn on chroot unless you're willing to set up the neces
MichalZ:
> Hi,
>
> I have defined three ldap servers in the virtual_alias_maps lookup table,
> but failover seems doesn't work. When I shutdown first ldap server I get
> this error:
>
> warning: ldap:/etc/postfix-in/ldap-mail-groups.cf lookup error
> warning: dict_ldap_lookup: Search error -5: T
16 matches
Mail list logo