As a new administrator of postfix I am not able to determine which of the two
orders is correct from the existing documentation. An additional sentence
would be very helpful. Perhaps, under canonical(5) section "TABLE SEARCH
ORDER": "Each pattern is looked for across the entire set of tables
On Thu Sep 15 2016 14:00:46 mro...@insiberia.net
said:
>
> But can anyone answer my question - what factors should I consider when
> increasing the limit in the 30-50MB range (or higher)? Are there drawbacks to
> doing this?
The main factor is that the limit used by most everyone is ab
It just doesn't seem very clear to me. And one of our customers even got
the wrong impression about the search order. I think a sentence like the
following could be dropped in there somewhere: "First, a match of
'user@domain' is searched for across all the listed tables in the order
the tables
canonical(5) section "TABLE SEARCH ORDER":
"With lookups from indexed files such as DB or DBM, or from
networked tables such as NIS, LDAP or SQL, patterns are tried
in the order as listed below:"
That really does what it says: try the first query. Try the second
query. And so o
Thank you!
The documentation seems a bit ambiguous on this topic. After reading
canonical(5) and the canonical_maps section of postconf(5), I think it's
not clear which of the processing orders, mentioned in the first email,
it actually uses. Would you like me to write a patch for this?
Ondr
On 15/09/2016 16:47, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 09:51:11AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
Stephan Seitz:
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 06:49:08AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
FYI, Postfix uses libmysqlclient. So what's up with not reading
the default config file?
Can it be the usua
