On August 16, 2016 4:52:22 PM EDT, Keith Williams wrote:
>Hi Sean,
>
>Thank you for your advise, your folder solution is brilliant and
>simple.
>Sometimes I tend to over think the problem.
>
>That is going to work perfectly for my users.
>
>Regards,
Glad I could help.
--Sean
Hi Sean,
Thank you for your advise, your folder solution is brilliant and simple.
Sometimes I tend to over think the problem.
That is going to work perfectly for my users.
Regards,
On 2016/08/16 10:24 PM, Sean Greenslade wrote:
I have a suggestion based on my own way of implementing an ema
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 08:22:54PM +0200, Keith Williams wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was wondering if someone might be able to point me in the right direction
> as my searches proved fruitless.
>
> I am looking for a email verification system for postfix, but with a twist.
> Not referring to http://ww
Hi all,
I was wondering if someone might be able to point me in the right
direction as my searches proved fruitless.
I am looking for a email verification system for postfix, but with a
twist. Not referring to
http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_VERIFICATION_README.html
The system that I am loo
@lbutlr:
> On 09 Aug 2016, at 09:00, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Thanks. The "cp -p" feature was not portable in the days that this =
> script
> > was written, but it should be safe to use now.
>
> Hmm. I kind of thought that "If the user ID and group ID cannot be =
> preserved, no error message is
On 09 Aug 2016, at 09:00, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Thanks. The "cp -p" feature was not portable in the days that this script
> was written, but it should be safe to use now.
Hmm. I kind of thought that "If the user ID and group ID cannot be preserved,
no error message is displayed and the exit val
