Re: Mail deferred instead rejected

2016-06-12 Thread Peter
On 13/06/16 13:31, Il Neofita wrote: > smtp inet n - n - - smtpd > local unix - n n - - local Nope, neither one is running chrooted, so my theory was wrong. Looking again at your config, you've turned off checking for smtpd,

Re: Mail deferred instead rejected

2016-06-12 Thread Il Neofita
On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 9:23 PM, Peter wrote: > On 13/06/16 13:10, Il Neofita wrote: > > I redid the configuration without luck, therefore, I am doing the > > mistake over and over > > The smtpd is able to understand that the user does not exist, however, > > the local cannot do it > > You're pro

Re: Mail deferred instead rejected

2016-06-12 Thread Peter
On 13/06/16 13:10, Il Neofita wrote: > I redid the configuration without luck, therefore, I am doing the > mistake over and over > The smtpd is able to understand that the user does not exist, however, > the local cannot do it You're probably running local as chroot but not smtpd and the chroot en

Re: Mail deferred instead rejected

2016-06-12 Thread Il Neofita
>Il Neofita: >> postfix/local[5857]: 3DB0520EB0C4: to=, relay=local, >> delay=0.06, delays=0.01/0.02/0/0.04, dsn=4.0.0, status=deferred (user >> lookup error) >... >> I cannot figure out why the wrong email is not bounced or rejected > >Wietse: >> Because Postfix was unable to determine if the user

Re: Mail deferred instead rejected

2016-06-12 Thread Wietse Venema
Il Neofita: > postfix/local[5857]: 3DB0520EB0C4: to=, relay=local, > delay=0.06, delays=0.01/0.02/0/0.04, dsn=4.0.0, status=deferred (user > lookup error) ... > I cannot figure out why the wrong email is not bounced or rejected Wietse: > Because Postfix was unable to determine if the user exits.

Re: Mail deferred instead rejected

2016-06-12 Thread Il Neofita
Thank you for the information, however, it does not work File /etc/postfix/test ldap005@fake.domain OK postmap /etc/postfix/test [root@ldap tmp.k84NGQJdRH]# postmap -q ldap007a@fake.domain hash:/etc/postfix/test [root@ldap tmp.k84NGQJdRH]# echo $? 1 [root@ldap tmp.k84NGQJdRH]# postmap -q ldap0

Re: Mail deferred instead rejected

2016-06-12 Thread Marko Cupać
On Sun, 12 Jun 2016 14:55:11 -0400 Il Neofita wrote: > Is there a way to let postfix know that the user does not exist? http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#relay_recipient_maps -- Before enlightenment - chop wood, draw water. After enlightenment - chop wood, draw water. Marko Cupać https:/

Re: Mail deferred instead rejected

2016-06-12 Thread Il Neofita
Is there a way to let postfix know that the user does not exist? On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 1:55 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: > Il Neofita: > > postfix/local[5857]: 3DB0520EB0C4: to=, > relay=local, > > delay=0.06, delays=0.01/0.02/0/0.04, dsn=4.0.0, status=deferred (user > > lookup error) > ... > > I

Re: Mail deferred instead rejected

2016-06-12 Thread Wietse Venema
Il Neofita: > postfix/local[5857]: 3DB0520EB0C4: to=, relay=local, > delay=0.06, delays=0.01/0.02/0/0.04, dsn=4.0.0, status=deferred (user > lookup error) ... > I cannot figure out why the wrong email is not bounced or rejected Because Postfix was unable to determine if the user exits. Wi

Mail deferred instead rejected

2016-06-12 Thread Il Neofita
Hi, I have created a list using alias_maps and ldap, the ldap query is returning 2 results ldap007,ldap007a the ldap007a is not a valid user postfix/local[5857]: 3DB0520EB0C4: to=, relay=local, delay=0.06, delays=0.01/0.02/0/0.04, dsn=4.0.0, status=deferred (user lookup error) I have a virtual_a

Re: Documentation improvement request (was: RBLs in postscreen AND smtpd_*_restrictions)

2016-06-12 Thread Wietse Venema
Jan Ceuleers: [ Charset windows-1252 converted... ] > On 12/06/16 02:05, Wietse Venema wrote: > > Wietse Venema: > >> I have changed the text to: > >> > >> Otherwise it replies with the query arguments plus an empty > >> address list and the reply TTL. The reply TTL is -1 if no > >>

Re: Documentation improvement request (was: RBLs in postscreen AND smtpd_*_restrictions)

2016-06-12 Thread Jan Ceuleers
On 12/06/16 02:05, Wietse Venema wrote: > Wietse Venema: >> I have changed the text to: >> >> Otherwise it replies with the query arguments plus an empty >> address list and the reply TTL. The reply TTL is -1 if no >> reply is received, or if the reply contains no TTL information)