The text under "TABLE SEARCH ORDER" describes that the search order
is first user+extension@domain, second user@domain, third domain, etc.
The text "Tables will be searched in the specified order until a
match is found" means that it first searches all tables for
user+extension@domain, second all
On 15/3/2016 9:26 μμ, Peter wrote:
All you're doing here is doubling up on -DUSE_SASL_AUTH and changing
hard-coded defaults to dovecot. Leave well enough alone and put your
dovecot SASL settings in main.cf where they belong.
Sorry for my ignorance,
Thank you very much for all the clarificati
Hello,
I'm trying to select a transport to use based on the recipient domain
in a transport_map hash file, but a lower priority regexp that matches
the full recipient address is overriding the higher priority
domain-level match. Based on the postconf transport_maps
documentation, "Tables will be
On 16/03/16 03:16, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
> A final query: S.J. Mudd's SRPMs included an SPF option. Is this option
> still valid/meaningful/useful in latest postfix versions?
Missed the above question before.
Postfix does not have any built-in support for SPF. A quick look at
Mudd's RPM shows th
Pedro David Marco:
> Thanks a lot Wietse...
>
> here they are:
Your Postfix SMTP clients are hanging (resulting in watchdog
timeouts). Are you running in a VM, or some other hosting setup?
Wietse
> Mar 13 10:47:29 serverA postfix/qmgr[23376]: fatal: 80844160065: timeout
> receiving d
Pedro David Marco:
> Mar 13 06:47:22 serverA postfix/error[17720]: 80844160065:
> to=,
> relay=none, delay=235656, delays=235058/597/0/0.01,
> dsn=4.3.0, status=deferred (unknown mail transport error)
Well there is your problem.
For follow-up investigation see:
http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_RE
On 16/03/16 03:16, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
> On 15/3/2016 11:44 πμ, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
>
>> So, it seems that initially the above compilation options are
>> disabled. Right?
>>
>
> To answer my own question, in fact, it's the other way round! For example:
>
>%bcond_without ldap
>
> means l
By the way, Wietse...
nothing is running chrooted in master.cf
David.
On Tue, 3/15/16, Pedro David Marco wrote:
Subject: Re: Mails in active queue are never tried to be sent
To: "Postfix users"
Date: Tuesday, March 15, 2016, 7:50 PM
Thanks a
Thanks a lot Wietse...
here they are:
Mar 13 06:37:24 serverA postfix/qmgr[19283]: 80844160065:
from=, size=64276, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
Mar 13 06:47:22 serverA postfix/error[17720]: 80844160065:
to=, relay=none, delay=235656, delays=235058/597/0/0.01,
dsn=4.3.0, status=deferred (unknown mai
In message <76865be6-8041-498d-91ae-36ef80c91...@kreme.com>
"@lbutlr" writes:
>
> On Mar 13, 2016, at 9:06 AM, Robert Chalmers wrote:
> > Nice hardware, but the software is really recycled FreeBSD. say what?
>
> This should not be news. One of the reasons I chose FreeBSD for my
> servers was b
> Le 14 mars 2016 à 22:24, Sebastian Nielsen a écrit :
>
> SPF and DKIM is mail tools to prevent spoofing of non-local domains.
> OP was out after tools to prevent local spoofing.
>
> One is for example:
> 1: reject_sender_login_mismatch
> 2: Other is a check_sender_access table containing "you
On 15/3/2016 11:44 πμ, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
So, it seems that initially the above compilation options are
disabled. Right?
To answer my own question, in fact, it's the other way round! For example:
%bcond_without ldap
means ldap is enabled by default!
And a second question: Could we b
Pedro David Marco:
>
>
> Hello everybody!!
>
> i am trying to run a filter relay with Postfix and i have a doubt about
> active queues i need help with, please...
>
> Postfix documentation states clearly that:
>
> "Messages in the active queue are ready to be sent (runnable), but
> are not n
On 14/3/2016 8:56 μμ, Peter wrote:
The -release RPM for CentOS 7 is at:
http://mirror.symnds.com/distributions/gf/el/7/gf/x86_64/gf-release-7-8.gf.el7.noarch.rpm
Thank you Peter,
I took a first look at your Postfix3 SRPM package today. It looks well
organized and updated.
Before I move on
14 matches
Mail list logo
