On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 07:32:02PM -0500, Ron Guerin wrote:
> On 2/29/2016 12:19 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> > For submission of list messages to a large number of recipients, I
> > would generally use sendmail(1) rather than SMTP. Don't know whether
> > mailman supports that.
> >
>
> It does,
> I run an old-school DOS-based BBS that uses the UUCP protocol to transfer
> internet email. I would like to set up a Postfix box that sits on the
> internet, fetches and stores email and then forwards it via UUCP when the the
> BBS, running FX UUCICO, connects to transfer the mail and send out a
Hi all.
I run an old-school DOS-based BBS that uses the UUCP protocol to transfer
internet email. I would like to set up a Postfix box that sits on the
internet, fetches and stores email and then forwards it via UUCP when the the
BBS, running FX UUCICO, connects to transfer the mail and send o
Hi,
I'm trying to map users to first.last in canonical but I get an error when
sending email to the
canonicalized address first.last@domain:
Recipient address rejected: User unknown in local recipient table
What am I not understanding? Any help is appreciated.
Here are my configs and the error
Hello!
I'm configuring a postfix-base mail server (iRedMail) to be a normal mail
system with some users that receive and send mails via the Italy PEC
providers.
Reading mail and injecting received messages in the local server is done via
IMAPS connection to the PEC server with a fetchmail inst
Wietse Venema:
> This means that not a lot of people have symlinks in Postfix
> configuration directories. The code responsible for the warning
> is:
>
> find $todo \( -perm -020 -o -perm -002 \) \
> -exec $WARN group or other writable: {} \;
>
> Although it's kind of lame fo
Just back from NZ and did as suggested.
Three problems showed up - missing dict_ldap library - as we don't use
LDAP I don't think this matters.
Localtime differed from the /etc/localtime - not sure why, but copying
the file from /etc seemed to solved the problem.
The version of libgcc_s in
On 2/29/2016 12:19 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> For submission of list messages to a large number of recipients, I
> would generally use sendmail(1) rather than SMTP. Don't know whether
> mailman supports that.
>
It does, but its use is "highly discouraged".
- Ron
pf-m...@duboulder.com:
> On postfix startup this message is logged:
> [postfix-out/postfix-script] warning: group or other writable:
> /etc/postfix-out/./gen-dh-params.sh
>
> Is this expected behavior? This is a multi-instance setup with a common script
> in the main config directory.
>
> # post
On postfix startup this message is logged:
[postfix-out/postfix-script] warning: group or other writable:
/etc/postfix-out/./gen-dh-params.sh
Is this expected behavior? This is a multi-instance setup with a common script
in the main config directory.
# postconf mail_version
mail_version = 3.0.3
Some of the servers that expose TLS to cross-protocol DROWN attacks
via SSLv2 are MTAs running Postfix. If you're using an older
Postfix release (released prior to July 20 2015), or you've explicitly
configured TLS settings that may have enabled SSLv2, please update
your configuration as suggeste
Thank you, increasing the process count solved the problem!
Amda
On 01.03.2016 15:22, Wietse Venema wrote:
Wietse Venema:
gsotsas:
Feb 29 10:36:45 sh3 postfix/smtp[10878]: A49A26C693:
to=, relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:10024, conn_use=16,
delay=1129, delays=0.05/1115/0/13, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent
Wietse Venema:
> gsotsas:
> > Feb 29 10:36:45 sh3 postfix/smtp[10878]: A49A26C693:
> > to=, relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:10024, conn_use=16,
> > delay=1129, delays=0.05/1115/0/13, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 2.0.0
> > from MTA([127.0.0.1]:10025): 250 2.0.0 Ok: queued as 5B5236C65C)
>
> Your mail
On Tuesday, March 01, 2016 10:19:26 AM JosC wrote:
> Just upgraded to Postfix 3 - thanks for this release!
> With SPF validation I now get stuck on following in my main.cfg:
>
> Feb 29 10:14:33 ceto postfix/smtpd[50770]: warning: unknown smtpd
> restriction: "reject_spf_invalid_sender" Feb 29 10:1
gsotsas:
> Feb 29 10:36:45 sh3 postfix/smtp[10878]: A49A26C693:
> to=, relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:10024, conn_use=16,
> delay=1129, delays=0.05/1115/0/13, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 2.0.0
> from MTA([127.0.0.1]:10025): 250 2.0.0 Ok: queued as 5B5236C65C)
Your mail is stuck before your content
# postconf -n
alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases
alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases
biff = no
bounce_queue_lifetime = 0
command_directory = /usr/sbin
config_directory = /etc/postfix
content_filter = smtp-amavis:[127.0.0.1]:10024
daemon_directory = /usr/lib/postfix
data_directory = /var/lib/postfix
deb
# postconf -n
alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases
alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases
biff = no
bounce_queue_lifetime = 0
command_directory = /usr/sbin
config_directory = /etc/postfix
content_filter = smtp-amavis:[127.0.0.1]:10024
daemon_directory = /usr/lib/postfix
data_directory = /var/lib/postfix
deb
Hello folks,
I have a problem with my postfix relay server.
Sometimes mails are delayed up to 30 minutes. They remain there in the
qmgr. Then they are passed to amavis for content filtering.
How can this happen? How do I avoid this?
# grep "Feb 29 10:" /var/log/mail/mail.log | grep --color -P
If you find it on http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html it is part of
Postfix.
If not, someone else added it and it is not part of Postfix or it
doesn't exist at all.
Patrick
Am 01.03.2016 um 10:19 schrieb JosC:
> Just upgraded to Postfix 3 - thanks for this release!
> With SPF validation I now
Just upgraded to Postfix 3 - thanks for this release!
With SPF validation I now get stuck on following in my main.cfg:
Feb 29 10:14:33 ceto postfix/smtpd[50770]: warning: unknown smtpd restriction:
"reject_spf_invalid_sender"
Feb 29 10:14:33 ceto postfix/smtpd[50773]: warning: unknown smtpd rest
20 matches
Mail list logo
