You might want to have a look at fail2ban. It monitors log files and blocks
the offender by inserting an iptables DROP entry.
I block a lot of spammers this way. I wouldn't think of running a mail server
without it.
Bill
On 2/4/2016 4:10 PM, Inteq Solution - Dep. Tehnic wrote:
Thank you W
Thanks for both replies,
I've just checked and I'm running python-ipaddr 2.1.9, with no updates
available. I can live with the problem for now, I think this is the
only time I've seen that error (though that doesn't mean it hasn't
happened before).
Thanks again for your help
On 04/02/2016 9:34
On Thursday, February 04, 2016 04:19:54 PM Bill Cole wrote:
> On 4 Feb 2016, at 15:52, Danny Horne wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I am getting the following error on just one email address from
> > policyd-spf, called from Postfix. No other email address has caused
> > me
> > problems (as far as I'm
On 4 Feb 2016, at 15:52, Danny Horne wrote:
Hi all,
I am getting the following error on just one email address from
policyd-spf, called from Postfix. No other email address has caused
me
problems (as far as I'm aware) and I had to completely disable
policyd-spf in Postfix to allow the email
Thank you Wietse,
450 it is then.
Razvan Constantin
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
[mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Wietse Venema
Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2016 11:06 PM
To: Postfix users
Subject: Re: Change Temporary failure in name
Inteq Solution - Dep. Tehnic:
> "The unknown_client_reject_code parameter specifies the response code for
> rejected requests (default: 450). The reply is always 450 in case the
> address->name or name->address lookup failed due to a temporary problem."
>
> But is there a way to change this behavi
On Thursday, February 04, 2016 03:33:14 PM Dave Goodrich wrote:
> - Original Message -
>
> > From: "Noel Jones"
> > To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> > Sent: Thursday, February 4, 2016 11:51:53 AM
> > Subject: Re: SPF
> >
> > On 2/4/2016 9:27 AM, Dave Goodrich wrote:
> > > Hello all,
> > >
Hi all,
I am getting the following error on just one email address from
policyd-spf, called from Postfix. No other email address has caused me
problems (as far as I'm aware) and I had to completely disable
policyd-spf in Postfix to allow the email through. Can anyone decipher
what the problem wa
Hello,
I am having some problems with a host hammering my logs all day long because
the connection is rejected with 450, even after I have spoken with the
person responsible for the domain, explaining why this is happening and what
he should do to fix it.
hostname ip92.llpdynamics.com does
- Original Message -
> From: "Noel Jones"
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Sent: Thursday, February 4, 2016 11:51:53 AM
> Subject: Re: SPF
>
> On 2/4/2016 9:27 AM, Dave Goodrich wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > May I ask a question about SPF failure? It is not Postfix specific
> > though
El 2016-02-04 13:24, wie...@porcupine.org escribió:
nico...@devels.es:
Hi,
What would be the equivalent of negative look-ahead assertions in
Postfix's map files?
1) Postfix has are table-driven features such as canonical_maps,
alias_maps, etc.
2) These features use table lookup mechanisms
On 2/4/2016 9:27 AM, Dave Goodrich wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> May I ask a question about SPF failure? It is not Postfix specific
> though our server is running Postifx. You folks just happen to be
> the group I trust the most for a decent answer.
>
We'll be pleased to discuss technical details of S
Neil Tiffin:
> Feb 4 15:17:03 fairwindsoft2 postfix/smtp[6671]: auto_clnt_create:
> transport=local endpoint=private/scache
There is no need for verbose logging, the noise drowns out the
useful information.
> Feb 4 15:17:03 fairwindsoft2 postfix/smtp[6671]: fatal: event_enable_read:
> epoll_c
Hello,
New user here, I am not an admin but was forced to move from a managed vps to
an unmanaged vps and am having trouble configuring email. Right now imap and
pop3 via dovecot are working, sending email from remote email client is
working, but receiving email is not.
Any help would be app
Hello all,
May I ask a question about SPF failure? It is not Postfix specific though our
server is running Postifx. You folks just happen to be the group I trust the
most for a decent answer.
Thanks,
Dave Goodrich
Webmaster
City of Greenfield, Indiana
317-477-4309
nico...@devels.es:
> Hi,
>
> What would be the equivalent of negative look-ahead assertions in
> Postfix's map files?
1) Postfix has are table-driven features such as canonical_maps,
alias_maps, etc.
2) These features use table lookup mechanisms such as pcre, hash,
etc.
Try using pcre in
Hi,
What would be the equivalent of negative look-ahead assertions in
Postfix's map files?
I have:
main.cf:
sender_canonical_maps = regexp:/etc/postfix/canonical_maps
/etc/postfix/canonical_maps:
/^((?!foo[0-9]+).*)@domain1.com$/ ${1}@domain2.com
I want that any mail that comes from
This command only applies on the domain part and not on the local part,
right? So I can change john@gmail.com into john@mydomain.com, but
not john@gmail.com into us...@mydomain.com ?
In this case the recipient would still be able to deduce the sender's
personal email address.
On Wed, F
18 matches
Mail list logo
