Ops!!
Thanks! I gladly do it, Wietse...
The problem is this:
i actually have a transport file like this:
DomainA.comsmtp:[10.10.10.1]:25
DomainB.comsmtp:[10.10.10.2]:25
DomainC.comsmtp:[10.10.10.3]:25
:
:
and so on...
what i need is to have alternative (fallback?) servers per each
On 1/12/2016 11:00 AM, Matteo Cazzador wrote:
> Hi, i've question about smtp sender restriction.
>
> I've a domain example.com, is it possible for specified users domain
> restrict to send mail only to example.com.
>
> Example:
>
> j...@example.com can send mail to every domain
>
> t...@example
Hi, i've question about smtp sender restriction.
I've a domain example.com, is it possible for specified users domain
restrict to send mail only to example.com.
Example:
j...@example.com can send mail to every domain
t...@example.com can send mail only to example.com domain and relative
user
francis picabia:
> The tests have been done in both 2.6.6 and 3.0.2
>
> We've been using canonical_maps for over a decade
> without a hitch, but recently came across a situation
> where an account is referenced in both mapping files.
>
> canonical_maps =
> hash:/etc/postfix-internal/lowercase,has
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 10:09 AM, @lbutlr wrote:
> On Jan 12, 2016, at 6:43 AM, francis picabia wrote:
>> We've been using canonical_maps for over a decade
>> without a hitch, but recently came across a situation
>> where an account is referenced in both mapping files.
>>
>> canonical_maps =
>> h
On Jan 12, 2016, at 6:43 AM, francis picabia wrote:
> We've been using canonical_maps for over a decade
> without a hitch, but recently came across a situation
> where an account is referenced in both mapping files.
>
> canonical_maps =
> hash:/etc/postfix-internal/lowercase,hash:/etc/postfix-int
Pedro David Marco:
> Thanks a lot Wietse for your quick answer...
>
> but then... does this mean that i cannot use smtp_fallback_relays
> in transport_map file??
Perhaps you can explain what problem you are trying to solve.
I.e explain the problem instead of the solution, because
there may be a b
The tests have been done in both 2.6.6 and 3.0.2
We've been using canonical_maps for over a decade
without a hitch, but recently came across a situation
where an account is referenced in both mapping files.
canonical_maps =
hash:/etc/postfix-internal/lowercase,hash:/etc/postfix-internal/genericst
Thanks a lot Wietse for your quick answer...
but then... does this mean that i cannot use smtp_fallback_relays in
transport_map file??
Thanks again!
Pedro.
On Tue, 1/12/16, Wietse Venema wrote:
Subject: Re: smtp_fallback_relay in transport maps.
Pedro David Marco:
> Hello everybody!!!
>
> I am trying to set smtp_fallback_relays per domain in the transport map file.
>
> According to the documentation this is possible:
> "In transport maps, specify "relay:nexthop..." as the right-hand side for
> backup or primary MX domain entries."
Th
Hello everybody!!!
I am trying to set smtp_fallback_relays per domain in the transport map file.
According to the documentation this is possible:
"In transport maps, specify "relay:nexthop..." as the right-hand side for
backup or primary MX domain entries."
i have tried:
domain.com smtp:[
11 matches
Mail list logo
