Re: Could someone check my master.cf file please for accuracy and validity.

On Thu, 03 Dec 2015 22:26:19 -0500 "Bill Cole" wrote: > DO NOT move the '-o smtpd_tls_wrappermode=yes' line to > the section for the submission service. That is ONLY > for the deprecated port 465 (SMTP inside SSL) service. > If you put it on port 587 for submission, submission > will not work. y

Re: Could someone check my master.cf file please for accuracy and validity.

On 3 Dec 2015, at 8:33, Koko Wijatmoko wrote: [...] submission inet n - n - - smtpd -o smtpd_tls_security_level=encrypt -o syslog_name=postfix/submission -o smtpd_tls_security_level=encrypt -o smtpd_milters=inet:127.0.0.1:8891 smtp unix - - n

Re: smtpd_helo restrictions no permanent error? Can we change it?

On 12/3/2015 5:01 PM, Thomas Nagel wrote: > Hi, > > we implemented a smtpd_helo_restrictions check with this configuration: > > smtpd_helo_restrictions = > permit_mynetworks, > permit_sasl_authenticated, > # check_client_access hash:/etc/postfix/ > check_helo_access hash:/etc/postfix/check_

smtpd_helo restrictions no permanent error? Can we change it?

Hi, we implemented a smtpd_helo_restrictions check with this configuration: smtpd_helo_restrictions = permit_mynetworks, permit_sasl_authenticated, # check_client_access hash:/etc/postfix/ check_helo_access hash:/etc/postfix/check_helo_access reject_invalid_helo_hostname # reject_non_fqd

Re: spamassassin exceptions

Peter skrev den 2015-12-03 21:39: In the meantime I found another approach that worked for me: http://serverfault.com/questions/33518/postfix-skip-spam-checks-for-authorized-smtp see my comment on this url

Re: spamassassin exceptions

Thanks Wietse, In the meantime I found another approach that worked for me: http://serverfault.com/questions/33518/postfix-skip-spam-checks-for-authorized-smtp Peter On Thu, Dec 3, 2015, at 03:43 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: > Peter: > > I would like to exclude certain IP ranges from scanning at a

Re: Has anyone else seen this please? spamd[94095]: spf: lookup failed: etc etc

On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 05:05:37PM +, Robert Chalmers wrote: > I have spam assassin running under postfix - but I’m getting an error > popping up now and then, and I’m darned if I can locate how to fix it. > Has anyone on the list seen this? > > spamd[94095]: spf: lookup failed: Can't locate ob

Re: Could someone check my master.cf file please for accuracy and validity.

On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 9:18 AM, Noel Jones wrote: > On 12/3/2015 11:07 AM, Steve Jenkins wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 9:01 AM, Robert Chalmers > > mailto:rob...@chalmers.com.au>> wrote: > > > > To enlarge on that, I have in main.cf and > > master.cf

Re: Could someone check my master.cf file please for accuracy and validity.

Thanks Noel, as it is working - I’ll leave well enough alone then. Thanks > On 3 Dec 2015, at 17:18, Noel Jones wrote: > > On 12/3/2015 11:07 AM, Steve Jenkins wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 9:01 AM, Robert Chalmers >> mailto:rob...@chalmers.com.au>> wrote: >> >>To enlarge on that, I ha

Re: Could someone check my master.cf file please for accuracy and validity.

On 12/3/2015 11:07 AM, Steve Jenkins wrote: > On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 9:01 AM, Robert Chalmers > mailto:rob...@chalmers.com.au>> wrote: > > To enlarge on that, I have in main.cf and > master.cf the following > > main.cf > ///

Re: Could someone check my master.cf file please for accuracy and validity.

Thanks Steve So is that main.cf or master.cf that you have it in only… … It’s pretty much your earlier setup you posted that I’m using :-) > I have OpenDKIM and OpenDMARC milters listed only in main.cf, and both are > running fine. So if it’s in master.cf it’s submission only, if in main.cf it

Re: Could someone check my master.cf file please for accuracy and validity.

On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 9:01 AM, Robert Chalmers wrote: > To enlarge on that, I have in main.cf and master.cf the following > > main.cf > /// > # dkim > smtpd_milters = inet:127.0.0.1:8891 > non_smtpd_milters = inet:127.0.0.1:8891 > milter_defaul

Has anyone else seen this please? spamd[94095]: spf: lookup failed: etc etc

I have spam assassin running under postfix - but I’m getting an error popping up now and then, and I’m darned if I can locate how to fix it. Has anyone on the list seen this? spamd[94095]: spf: lookup failed: Can't locate object method "handles" via package "IO::Socket::IP" at /opt/local/lib/p

Re: Could someone check my master.cf file please for accuracy and validity.

To enlarge on that, I have in main.cf and master.cf the following main.cf /// # dkim smtpd_milters = inet:127.0.0.1:8891 non_smtpd_milters = inet:127.0.0.1:8891 milter_default_action = accept //

Re: Could someone check my master.cf file please for accuracy and validity.

So I'm still needing to put the openDkim in master.cf ? - From my iPhone. > On 3 Dec 2015, at 4:50 p.m., Steve Jenkins wrote: > >> On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 7:51 AM, Noel Jones wrote: >> Settings in main.cf apply to all services. Settings in master.cf >> only apply to the service they are

Re: Could someone check my master.cf file please for accuracy and validity.

On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 7:51 AM, Noel Jones wrote: > Settings in main.cf apply to all services. Settings in master.cf > only apply to the service they are listed in. > > You may have a milter that is needed only in the "submission" > service, such as a DKIM signer. Thanks, Noel. I figured as mu

Re: Could someone check my master.cf file please for accuracy and validity.

On 12/3/2015 9:43 AM, Steve Jenkins wrote: > On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 1:54 AM, Robert Chalmers > mailto:rob...@chalmers.com.au>> wrote: > > Could someone check my master.cf file please > for accuracy and validity. Especially spamassassin and how it’s > setup. > >

Re: Could someone check my master.cf file please for accuracy and validity.

On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 1:54 AM, Robert Chalmers wrote: > Could someone check my master.cf file please for accuracy and validity. > Especially spamassassin and how it’s setup. > > master.cf related section: > > submission inet n - n - - smtpd > -o smtpd_tls_security

Re: unknown recipient domain being soft bounced despite 550 setting

On 12/3/2015 9:02 AM, Marko Cupać wrote: > Hi, > > I have the following in main.cf: > > soft_bounce = no > unknown_address_reject_code = 550 > > Still, postfix server rejects mail from our exchange server with 450 > instead of 550: > > Dec 3 15:41:32 mx2 postfix/smtpd[40509]: NOQUEUE: reject:

unknown recipient domain being soft bounced despite 550 setting

Hi, I have the following in main.cf: soft_bounce = no unknown_address_reject_code = 550 Still, postfix server rejects mail from our exchange server with 450 instead of 550: Dec 3 15:41:32 mx2 postfix/smtpd[40509]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from exchange.senderdomain.org[D.D.D.D]: 450 4.1.2 : Rec

Re: spamassassin exceptions

Peter: > I would like to exclude certain IP ranges from scanning at all. Say I do > not want to scan messages from 1.2.3.4 at all (do not forward them to > the content filter). How can I generally do that? The simplest solution is to use a spamassassin-internal whitelist. Other solutions are poss

spamassassin exceptions

Hi folks, I have SA injected into my postfix system the following way: master.cf: 10.0.0.1:smtp inet n - n - - smtpd -o content_filter=spamassassin spamassassinunix - n n - - pipe user=spamassassin argv=/usr/bin/spamc

Re: Could someone check my master.cf file please for accuracy and validity.

On Thu, 3 Dec 2015 20:33:10 +0700 Koko Wijatmoko wrote: > you enable submission service twice again.. > sory again, port 465 != 587..

Re: Could someone check my master.cf file please for accuracy and validity.

dont email me private, post it to mailing list.. sorry not to clear what i mean but.. you enable submission service twice again.. > submission inet n - n - - smtpd > -o smtpd_tls_security_level=encrypt > -o syslog_name=postfix/submission > -o smtpd_tls_s

Re: Could someone check my master.cf file please for accuracy and validity.

forgot to comment about your SMTP-AUTH, move it to submission. opening SMTP-AUTH on standard SMTP port is risky (brute force attack). On Thu, 3 Dec 2015 12:49:47 + Chalmers wrote: > Thanks. How did I not see that? I cant believe it. > > thanks > > > > On 3 Dec 2015, at 10:50 a.m., Koko W

Re: Could someone check my master.cf file please for accuracy and validity.

Thanks. How did I not see that? I cant believe it. thanks - From my iPhone. > On 3 Dec 2015, at 10:50 a.m., Koko Wijatmoko wrote: > > On Thu, 3 Dec 2015 09:54:50 + > Robert Chalmers wrote: > >> submission inet n - n - - smtpd >> -o smtpd_tls_security

Re: Could someone check my master.cf file please for accuracy and validity.

On Thu, 3 Dec 2015 09:54:50 + Robert Chalmers wrote: > submission inet n - n - - smtpd > -o smtpd_tls_security_level=encrypt > -o syslog_name=postfix/submission > -o smtpd_tls_security_level=encrypt > -o smtpd_milters=inet:127.0.0.1:8891 Err.. "smtpd_tls

Could someone check my master.cf file please for accuracy and validity.

Could someone check my master.cf file please for accuracy and validity. Especially spamassassin and how it’s setup. master.cf related section: # Begin auto-generated section # This section of the master.cf file is auto-generated by the Server Admin #