Re: header_checks with other table types

On Sun, Nov 08, 2015 at 07:07:25PM +1300, Peter wrote: > On 11/08/2015 06:20 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > > Just be aware that headers potentially contain embedded new-lines, > > and can be up to 100k bytes (header_size_limit) long. Test your > > SQL engine to make sure it supports queries with s

Re: header_checks with other table types

On 11/08/2015 06:20 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > Just be aware that headers potentially contain embedded new-lines, > and can be up to 100k bytes (header_size_limit) long. Test your > SQL engine to make sure it supports queries with string literals > that long. Thanks for the heads up, the mysql

Re: header_checks with other table types

On Sun, Nov 08, 2015 at 02:56:16PM +1300, Peter wrote: > According to header_checks(5), header_checks is assumed to be used with > pcre or regexp table types, but I'd like to know if it would work with > other tables types. My use case is an SQL table that does substring > matching based on the t

header_checks with other table types

According to header_checks(5), header_checks is assumed to be used with pcre or regexp table types, but I'd like to know if it would work with other tables types. My use case is an SQL table that does substring matching based on the tables contents and a query to specify how the match is performed

Re: OpenDKIM

On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 9:19 AM, wrote: > Some of my favs: > > https://en.internet.nl/ (if you're running Postscreen, it will fail the > TLS test as it doesn't wait for the STARTTLS offer) > http://www.mail-tester.com > https://ssl-tools.net > https://dane.sys4.de/ (thanks Victor!) > http://arp.si

Re: OpenDKIM

On 2015-11-07 16:41, Mike wrote: On 11/7/2015 9:09 AM, Steve Jenkins wrote: On Saturday, November 7, 2015, John Allen mailto:j...@klam.ca>> wrote: Interesting! I tried a couple of DKIM test sites, one says I am signing my emails, the other says I am not!! Mailradar say I am no

Re: OpenDKIM

Some of my favs: https://en.internet.nl/ (if you're running Postscreen, it will fail the TLS test as it doesn't wait for the STARTTLS offer) http://www.mail-tester.com https://ssl-tools.net https://dane.sys4.de/ (thanks Victor!) http://arp.simson.net/dev/dane_check.cgi/ (defunct :( ) On 11/07/201

Re: OpenDKIM

‎Note that Domain Keys is not the same as DKIM. DKIM supercedes Domain Keys.   http://support2.constantcontact.com/articles/FAQ/2213 I'm no guru on this, so correct away if I'm wrong. I can pass DKIM, but not Domain Keys. I don't know if it is possible to pass both tests in one implementation,

Re: OpenDKIM

On 11/7/2015 9:09 AM, Steve Jenkins wrote: > On Saturday, November 7, 2015, John Allen > wrote: > > Interesting! > I tried a couple of DKIM test sites, one says I am signing my > emails, the other says I am not!! > Mailradar say I am not signing! > DKIMVal

Re: OpenDKIM

On Saturday, November 7, 2015, John Allen wrote: > Interesting! > I tried a couple of DKIM test sites, one says I am signing my emails, the > other says I am not!! > Mailradar say I am not signing! > DKIMValidator say I am! > My favorite "test site" for SPF, DKIM, DMARC configuration and validat

Re: OpenDKIM

Hi On 2015-11-07 14:30, John Allen wrote: Interesting! I tried a couple of DKIM test sites, one says I am signing my emails, the other says I am not!! Mailradar say I am not signing! DKIMValidator say I am! They are both right. Mailradar checks for DomainKeys (rfc4870) signatures, DomainKeys

Re: OpenDKIM

Interesting! I tried a couple of DKIM test sites, one says I am signing my emails, the other says I am not!! Mailradar say I am not signing! DKIMValidator say I am! On 2015-11-06 1:13 PM, John Allen wrote: Is OpenDKIM worth while? I use amavis and it says it signs and verifies DKIM so do need