On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 10:49:15PM +, Vernon Fort wrote:
> Ah- the order. I had:
>
> smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
> reject_non_fqdn_sender,
> reject_non_fqdn_recipient,
> permit_mynetworks,
> permit_sasl_authenticated,
> reject_unauth_destination,
>
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
> us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Viktor Dukhovni
> Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2015 5:15 PM
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: Re: append mydomain
>
> On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 09:53:48PM +, V
On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 09:53:48PM +, Vernon Fort wrote:
> > > I'm using postfix 3.0.2. The above appears correct but it's not
> > > working, still rejects a From address with an empty domain, e.g.
> > > "From=PostfixUser"
> > >
> > > Suggestions?
> >
> > * http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_R
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
> us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Viktor Dukhovni
> Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2015 4:38 PM
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: Re: append mydomain
>
> On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 08:56:02PM +, V
On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 08:56:02PM +, Vernon Fort wrote:
> I had an old postfix server (v2 something I think) which would add
> @domain.com to the From address for clients within the local network. I
> have the following configuration set:
>
> append_dot_mydomain = yes
> local_header_rewrite
I had an old postfix server (v2 something I think) which would add @domain.com
to the From address for clients within the local network. I have the following
configuration set:
append_dot_mydomain = yes
local_header_rewrite_clients = permit_mynetworks
remote_header_rewrite_domain = $mydomain (n
Markus Benning:
> On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 11:46:10AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Reusing the same client socket for multiple policy clients requires
> > a reference-counting mechanism that is best implemented in the lower
> > layers of the Postfix infrastructure. It is a unlikely that one
> > P
On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 11:46:10AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Reusing the same client socket for multiple policy clients requires
> a reference-counting mechanism that is best implemented in the lower
> layers of the Postfix infrastructure. It is a unlikely that one
> Postfix daemon process will
Viktor Dukhovni:
> On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 05:16:13PM +0200, Markus Benning wrote:
>
> > when running multiple checks in a policy daemon each check
> > needs to be running on a different port in the policy daemon
> > for the policy daemon to be able differentiate between the
> > checks when proces
On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 05:16:13PM +0200, Markus Benning wrote:
> when running multiple checks in a policy daemon each check
> needs to be running on a different port in the policy daemon
> for the policy daemon to be able differentiate between the
> checks when processing the request.
>
> What a
Hello,
when running multiple checks in a policy daemon each check
needs to be running on a different port in the policy daemon
for the policy daemon to be able differentiate between the
checks when processing the request.
What about adding a "virtual servers" feature to the policy check
similar t
Carlo Manuali:
> NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from unknown Sender address rejected: Domain not found
You may want to read this:
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#reject_unknown_sender_domain
Wietse
Dear all,
I have a production server which to deliver mails (btw with SSL) uses:
mailbox_command = /usr/bin/procmail -a "$EXTENSION" DEFAULT=$HOME/Maildir/
MAILDIR=$HOME/Maildir
After installing SpamAssassin (for which local testing is ok) I changed:
#smtp inet n -
On 2015-09-02 10:29, Martin Skjöldebrand wrote:
Quoting Steve Jenkins :
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 10:07 AM, Martin Skjöldebrand
wrote:
Following the tutorial here:
http://arstechnica.com/business/2014/03/taking-e-mail-back-part-3-fortifying-your-box-against-spammers/
[1]
What would a D
Quoting Steve Jenkins :
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 10:07 AM, Martin Skjöldebrand
wrote:
Following the tutorial here:
http://arstechnica.com/business/2014/03/taking-e-mail-back-part-3-fortifying-your-box-against-spammers/
What would a DKIM DNS record look like for my server
mail.skjoldebrand
15 matches
Mail list logo
