Re: "stopped working"

2015-08-26 Thread Martin Skjöldebrand
After a lot of head scratching and despair, I *think* I got the problem down to sasl authentication didn't authenticate. I can now send from one account (this) but not my main address with the same settings (w/ change of user/pw naturally). Looking further into this. /Martin S

Re: Confusion about DANE

2015-08-26 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 09:43:39PM -0700, Alice Wonder wrote: > >Furthermore, support for 1->3 mappings might lead users to erroneously > >expect 0->2 mappings, but the latter are in fact problematic. So > >supporting neither of the potential mappings is simpler and cleaner. > > Okay, thank you.

Re: Confusion about DANE

2015-08-26 Thread Alice Wonder
On 08/26/2015 09:03 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: Postfix implements a PKIX-EE(1) to DANE-EE(3) mapping that is ad-hoc and not standardized by any IETF document. That mapping has been mostly harmless, but should perhaps be withdrawn in a future release. The mapping predates the finalization of

Re: Confusion about DANE

2015-08-26 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 07:32:58PM -0700, Alice Wonder wrote: > LSA record was not usable, I have been confused, because that conformed to > the DANE / TLSA RFC. The DANE TLSA RFC has a pending update in the form of draft-ietf-dane-ops which is sitting in the RFC editor queue for imminent publica

Re: master.cf - multi IPv6 bindings but single IPv4 fallback in mixedmode possible??

2015-08-26 Thread dravion.sm...@gmx.net
Hi John I just moved the topic off the devel list >from the postfix side you can do it without multiple instances. You'd >need an additional lmtp transport in master.cf with customized settings >for lmtp_bind_address/lmtp_bind_address6 and myhostname (using the -o to >set options), to which you

Re: Confusion about DANE

2015-08-26 Thread Alice Wonder
Nevermind further down the README reads Support for certificate usage "1" is an experiment, it may be withdrawn in the future. Server operators SHOULD NOT publish TLSA records with usage "1". So one part of the README says that 1 is treated as 3 and another part says that may be withdrawn i

Confusion about DANE

2015-08-26 Thread Alice Wonder
Ever since I got that automated e-mail telling me my 1 0 1 hash LSA record was not usable, I have been confused, because that conformed to the DANE / TLSA RFC. I suggested that maybe SMTP servers, which are only doing hostname validation and can't be expected to CA validate, should treat a 1

Re: Block specific outgoing email

2015-08-26 Thread nicolas
El 2015-08-26 11:41, Antonio Alberola escribió: Hello, I would like know if it's possible to block outgoing emails with a specific subject, but only if the email is sent to a specific recipient. Thanks, Antonio Alberola It is possible but you will need to build your own filter to do that (o

Block specific outgoing email

2015-08-26 Thread Antonio Alberola
Hello, I would like know if it's possible to block outgoing emails with a specific subject, but only if the email is sent to a specific recipient. Thanks, Antonio Alberola