hi all,
i have installed dovecot+ postfix email server and a
LDAP server, if i create users on the LDAP server can dovecot pick up
the usernames and create a mailbox for the individual users
as atm
if i want to create an email address for users i add the user to the
email server and make a d
Am 25.06.2015 um 19:57 schrieb Wietse Venema:
J. Echter:
Am 22.06.2015 um 21:16 schrieb Wietse Venema:
J. Echter:
Jun 22 10:26:38 mule postfix/smtp[6901]: fatal: unknown service: smtp/tcp
Wietse:
It was unable to query the services(5) database via the mechanism
specified in nsswitch.conf.
J
J. Echter:
> Am 22.06.2015 um 21:16 schrieb Wietse Venema:
> > J. Echter:
> >> Jun 22 10:26:38 mule postfix/smtp[6901]: fatal: unknown service: smtp/tcp
> > Wietse:
> >> It was unable to query the services(5) database via the mechanism
> >> specified in nsswitch.conf.
> > J. Echter:
> >> nsswitch.c
Am 22.06.2015 um 21:16 schrieb Wietse Venema:
J. Echter:
Jun 22 10:26:38 mule postfix/smtp[6901]: fatal: unknown service: smtp/tcp
Wietse:
It was unable to query the services(5) database via the mechanism
specified in nsswitch.conf.
J. Echter:
nsswitch.conf says:
services: files
This mean
sashk:
> between.?5. Their response is:As
> per the logs so far It your server is making more than one connection
> in less than a second and this is strange as It does not seem to
> be configured this way.In this scenario even tho the
If they can't handle RFC 5321 which says try an alternate MX a
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 02:11:51PM +0200, Matteo Manzinello wrote:
> I tried send email with CC and BCC and I checked "Received: from" field,
> always work.
This is terrible. What's the obstacle to doing this right, by
processing the SMTP envelope address via virtual alias mapping.
If some ups
Viktor,What evidence do you have for that? The error messages are aboutmessage arrival rate for the same user. I am quite familiar withthese, and they are not caused by a small number of closely spacedmessages. Rather this symptom happens when a user quickly receivesa large number of messages due t
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 02:07:37PM +0530, Ram wrote:
> I see that milter.org has been shut down.
A commercial decision by the new owners of Sendmail. This does
not remove support for the milter API from Postfix.
> Now I am wondering if milters are the recommended way for extracting data ,
> or
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 08:11:45AM -0400, sashk wrote:
>Is there a way for me to instruct postfix not to attempt delivery to
>second MX host, if first attempt failed?
That would be wrong.
>According to the Google Apps support, it's exactly what causes the
>temporarily ban.
Nonse
I tried send email with CC and BCC and I checked "Received: from" field,
always work.
I disabled the header_checks and I used sieve rules but now I have
double amavis check :(. First time with the forward from original sender
and the second time the internal forward from "m...@mydomain.it" to
Viktor,It did not show back-to-back delivery of two separate messages.Rather it showed a single message that tried two MX hosts insuccession, because the first MX host returned a 4XX response.Is there a way for me to instruct postfix not to attempt delivery to second MX host, if first attempt faile
If you need access to SMTP session *and* content at the pre-queue stage,
MILTERs are the way to go.
We milter a lot and we are quite satisfied how well they work.
p@
Am 25.06.2015 um 10:37 schrieb Ram:
>
> I am currently using a custom milter to copy the mail for our
> archiving software , with o
I am currently using a custom milter to copy the mail for our archiving
software , with original envelope information.
I see that milter.org has been shut down.
Now I am wondering if milters are the recommended way for extracting
data , or perform some changes to mail in transit.
What are
13 matches
Mail list logo
